Altglobalist motley alliance

Ultraglobalists like to call the previous system isolationism but it was not. There are basically four positions in globalization.

Isolationism   previous system   alternative globalization   ultraglobalization

Ultraglobalists agenda is specific. They want to make European, American, Asian, African Union and put these under a World Fascist regime. Alternative globalization is very diverse. It is not ultraglobalists’ agenda and it is not the previous system. Now, let's look into this from a different perspective. Anti-ultra-globalists favor all three except ultra-globalization. There are not very many people supporting isolationism although ultraglobalist media tried to label Trump and Johnson as isolationists. Therefore, the anti-ultra-globalist camp has mostly people supporting the previous system or a different globalization. These will be the winners and will determine the kind of globalization that will prevail.

           1            2                                  3                                   4

1 isolationism  •  2 previous system  •  3 midpoint between 2 and 4  •  4 ultra-globalization

Since there are not only supporters or the previous system, it will move further to the right from point 2. It will be somewhere between 2 and 3. Where exactly will be determined by the composition and the weight (power) of each section in the anti-ultra-globalization camp. The discussion for altglobalization should only start after ultraglobalists are defeated. 

Ultraglobalists have a specific agenda not only on globalization but on other issues like economy, migration, environment. It is a whole package where you do not get to choose whatever you like. If ultraglobalists are not blocked from achieving their goals you will get the whole package.

Altglobalization does not try to impose an agenda on the world. It is based on the relative autonomy of countries. Altglobalization is trying to find ways of cooperation, coordination, communication, understanding, transfers, exchanges but each county will be relatively autonomous. Therefore, citizens of each country will choose their own agenda and will not have ultraglobalists’ agenda imposed on them.

Ultraglobalization is about centralization, compliance, control, propaganda and strictness. Altglobalization is about decentralization, choice, freedom, dialogue and endless possibilities.

Altglobalists should make a global alliance because ultraglobalists are a global alliance. The only issue that matters is globalization. Altglobalization does not take a political position on other matters because the belief is that a country’s citizens should be able to choose. There will be communication, exchange of views, discussion, dialogue at a global level but in the end each country will choose its own agenda. Fifth Way is an alternative proposal to ultraglobalists' prevailing ideology, Third Way. Fifth Way is more advanced than Third and Fourth Way. 

Some people agree with Biden, Macron, Trudeau in many issues. This is not important. With them you will get the whole ultraglobalization package that has damaged the lives of millions descent, hardworking, nice people. One only question needs to be answered. Do I want ultraglobalists’ whole package or do I want something else?

On the other hand, there may be some altglobalists that you disagree with. It does not matter if they are in another county. They can do whatever they want in their own country as long as they do not try to impose their agenda on you as the ultraglobalists do. What if these people you do not agree with are in the same country?

Ultraglobalists do have some minor differences but they are on the same agenda. The alternative globalization camp is very diverse with big differences. There are endless possibilities as we have explained. The time to determine alternative globalization is not now but when ultraglobalists are defeated. Otherwise we will have their agenda which is specific. 

An American may say; “I like Biden and I agree with him in many issues. I do not like Bolsonaro, Orban, Putin, Erdogan* at all. I disagree with them. I can’t be in the same camp with them. I would rather be on the same camp with Biden, Trudeau and Macron. They are civilized and cultivated people”.

You would ally with people like Bolsonaro, Orban, Putin, Erdogan only in the issue of globalization and no other one. The top ultraglobalists are ChiCom (Chinese Communists), the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). They are much much worse than Putin or Erdogan. Probably Japan and Italy will be with opponents of ultraglobalization. Even France can be on that side if Lepen wins the elections. In the previous elections it was the second party. 

Americans and British fought on the same side with Russians and Chinese in World War II. Russians were already communists. Chinese were not communists yet but were in their way of becoming. It happened right after World War II. That was an even bigger difference than with today's Russia and Turkey. These are free market democracies with many question marks about freedoms.

Anglosaxons were Germanic tribes. Some Nazis were very cultivated people. Probably Americans and British would rather be one the same side with Germans in World War II. They could relate to them better compared to Russians and Chinese. They had to ally not with the people they like more and can relate better but with the ones that had similar goals. Their goal in World War II was to stop Hitler from conquering the World.

Today, altglobalists effort is to stop ultragloblaists from achieving their goals. As we have already said, they want to form European, American, African, Asian Union, put all these under a World fascist regime. Like Hitler, they want to conquer the World and impose their political agenda on the World.

British and Americans did not become communists when they fought on the same side with Russia and China in World War II. Altglobalists in the West will not become like Putin and Erdogan if they are all in the same camp and fight against ultraglobalization. Battles and wars are won by building winning alliances. Sometimes these alliances are motley.

* They have given the impression that they are not ultraglobalists. Things are not clear yet on who is on which side.