Not strictly national interest
Not strictly national interest
There is a global battle between NWO and AntiNWO. AntiNWO gives power to nations. Supranational entities will have only the minimum required authority for their proper functioning. NWO wants to take away all powers from nations and give them to supranational entities, the four pseudo-continental Unions and the Global Government. They will all be controlled by NWO's vicious cabal.
Although AntiNWO supports power to nations, acting strictly on national interest, may sometimes harm AntiNWO's side and benefit NWO. It is crucial that in addition to national interest, the impact on the battle between NWO and AntiNWO is considered. Because if NWO prevails, nations will be entirely stripped away from their powers, which will be given to supranational entities.
We will examine only two related examples but there are more. One case is USA's effort to end EU's and Europe's reliance on Russian natural gas and replace it with their own. The other is Russia's prolongation of the war in Ukraine. Strictly viewed from national interest perspective, both could be correct from USA's and Russia's side respectively. But both could be hurting AntiNWO's fight against NWO.
According to NWO's failed plan, there will be four pseudo-continental Unions, European, African, American, Asian. These four will be under a Global Government. All four Unions and the Global Government will be controlled by NWO's vicious cabal, so it will be continental and global dictatorship. EU is the first and most important step in NWO's failed plan.
EU is the experiment for the economic and organizational model that will be also used in the other three Unions. African, Asian and American Union will be exactly like EU. Since EU is NWO's first and most important step, one of AntiNWO's most important goals is to end EU. For AntiNWO, EU is like a red rag to a bull. EU has to end, one way or the other. It is an absolute must for AntiNWO.
One of AntiNWO's strongest weapons against NWO is the spectacular plan. It has huge support since it was created according to people's preferences and because of that it is people's choice. Important part of AntiNWO's plan is the grouping which is very different from NWO's. There will be 10+2 Groups. There will be two Groups in Europe, Western and Eastern.
AntiNWO has also created a much different economic and organizational model for Groups. It gives power to nations. Unlike in NWO's plan, it is optional. Furthermore, AntiNWO's model will be modified for each Group's specific conditions. Also AntiNWO's Grouping has a lot more flexibility than NWO's. But it is necessary to have two Groups in Europe. Separation is a red line that can't be crossed.
According to AntiNWO's spectacular plan, there will be two relatively independent Subgroups in Eastern European Group, Western and Eastern. Western Subgroup will have all the countries that were supposed to be in EU, according to NWO's failed plan. Eastern Subgroup will be Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) without Ukraine and Moldova.
The two Subgroups will start as two separate independent Groups. There will be smooth transition for the countries that will exit EU and also in improving relations with Russia. Currently, many Eastern European countries have puppet governments placed by Western European NWO that are Anti-Russian. In the long run, all Eastern European countries should have good relations with Russia because they will be in the same Group.
Improvement in relations with Russia can happen slowly. AntiNWO does not consider necessary to have rapid improvement, as long as Western Subgroup is formed as an independent Group, separated from Western European countries. That must happen the soonest possible. Matters should get on the right track regarding grouping and the rest can follow slowly.
Although AntiNWO does not consider necessary fast improvement in the relations between Russia and the rest or Eastern Europe, it opposes anything in the opposite direction. Relations with Russia should not become worse than they are currently because this will be steps backwards in AntiNWO's planned route. Improvement in relations can be slow or even very slow but there can be no worsening caused by those who are supposedly against NWO.
AntiNWO does not oppose worsening Russia's relations with Western Europe. After all, if Western Europe keeps the same stance, the two European Groups will have very distant or non existent relations. In AntiNWO's plan, it is possible that Western and Eastern Europe have close relations but not necessary. Close relations could only happen if Western Europe supports and assists the formation of Eastern European Group.
Any development that puts Eastern Europe against Russia and together with Western Europe is viewed by AntiNWO as negative. It assists NWO's plan and causes trouble to AntiNWO's plan. AntiNWO is not concerned regarding Western Europe's relations with Russia. They can be very distant or non existent. AntiNWO is not concerned from where Eastern European countries buy natural gas or other products.
AntiNWO is extremely concerned about Russia's relations with the rest of Eastern European countries. They must be improved, even if this happens slowly or very slowly. In the long run, they must become good and close because in AntiNWO's plan they are in the same Group. AntiNWO is against any action that distances Eastern European countries from Russia and brings them closer to Western Europe.
It is understandable that USA has interest to sell natural gas and generally products and services. This is beneficial to them. Currently, USA has by far the largest trade deficit in the world. As a percentage of GDP it is not that bad. It is justified that they want to reduce trade deficit. This can be done in two ways. One is by reducing imports, using tariffs and other protectionist tools. The other is by increasing exports.
USA has relatively large trade deficits with some European countries like Ireland, Germany, Italy, Switzerland, France, Austria, Sweden. With some other EU countries, like Netherlands, UK, Belgium, Spain, Greece, Malta, Cyprus, USA has trade surplus. If USA sells more natural gas to European countries, deficits will decrease but surpluses will increase.
If the reasoning behind replacing Russia's natural gas is decreasing trade deficit, USA should focus on the European countries that have large surpluses with USA (deficits from USA's side). USA's argument against deficits is that this is not fair trade. If they increase surpluses with other countries, they will not be trading fairly. Nevertheless, if USA's surpluses increase with those countries that have deficits (from their side), USA's overall deficit and deficits with EU or Europe will decrease.