New articles

New Articles

1   -   2

Byzantium vs Western Europe 2

Byzantine Empire had remarkable accomplishments that are not well known. Most were in Constantinople which remains in Turkey. Voltaire's judgement was biased and wrong.

Byzantium vs Western Europe

Byzantine Empire was more advanced than Western Europe and probably the most advanced in the world. Byzantines had a crucial role in Renaissance and assisted Enlightment.

Reconsider Italy 2

North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe should be three advanced poles. Italy and PCB can be with Eastern Europe. Italy was in Byzantine Empire for a long period.

Reconsider Italy

Regardless of the decision about Russia, Italy could be with Eastern Europe. It has pros and cons. The best is to have all Eastern Europe as the pole of Coalition D.

Groups and Divisions

There can be only four Coalitions. Plan 2 has no Groups but Divisions-Subdivisions are necessary. It is a matter of internal organization that concerns each Coalitiion.

Byzantine and Russian

Byzantines and Russes had close relations. Coalition D could include the territory of Byzantine and Russian Empire, if Russia-Belarus are with most of Eastern Europe.

Evaluate compromises

Best option is to have all Eastern Europe together. In the two compromising options, a part is missing. Compromise reduces conflicts. One of the two should be chosen.

Away from destroyers

Western Europeans have been trying to conquer or control Eastern Europe since the Crusades. They caused the demise of Byzantine Empire, the wars in Yugoslavia and Ukraine.

An important decision 2

Southern - eastern division is Greco - Thraco - Illyrian territory and has strong influence from Byzantine - Hellenistic cultrure-civilization. There are only two choices.

An important decision

In one compromising option, Eastern Europe - Scandinavia - Finland - Austria is neutral area. In the other, Poland - Czechia - Baltic countries are with Western Europe.

Give them SFA?

Western Europe is responsible for the degradation of Balkans. It can never be with Balkans and Ukraine. SFA should be given to Western Europe only as a very good deal.

Completion in steps

Russia's placement is important. It will define Eastern Europe as pole. Then, large part of the Coalitions can be completed soon. Details will be left for the future.

Details in the future 2

There are complexities in Middle East. There is distrust of Turkey. Western Europe will try to control its Coalition. Several issues need consideration in the future.

Details in the future

Egypt could be with Eastern Europe. The rest of North Africa and Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries could be with Western Europe. Details will be decided in the future.

General guidelines

General guidelines should be decided soon. Main decisions are Russia's and India's placement. For China it is probably taken. British Isles, SFA are secondary decisions.

Give them ASEAN?

Western Europe should not accept the deal AntiNWO is giving them. They will end up with the worst placement. AntiNWO could give them ASEAN and two thirds of Subsahara.

Give them North Africa 2

Russia may be with Eastern Europe. This can be combined with giving North Africa to Western Europe. A horrible ordeal that has been going on for a millennium must stop.

Give them North Africa

TScandinavia-Finland-Austria and Oceania can be in D. Placing North Africa with Western Europe is a last resort solution. Armenia-Georgia can be with the rest of CIS.

Completing the Coalitions

There should be balance in economic strength and military power. Oceania's placement should be decided fist. It is relatively close to South America and could be in C.

Redefining the poles 2

Russia will consider being with China and Iran, only if Eastern Europe is not with Western or North America. Scandinavia-Finland-Austria will end up in Coalition D.

Redefining the poles

Without Russia, Eastern Europe should add areas to be a pole. The other poles will be North America, Western Europe. This matter can be settled soon, if Russia decides.

Broad guidelines in 2026

A Coalition of advaned areas is unlikely. The broad guidelines of the arrangement should be decided in 2026. Russia must decide if it will be with Eastern Europe or China.

Less probable arrangements 2

Spatial proximity is an advantage. Less probable arrangements could get support in the future. Russia is very attached to China, Iran. There is a compromising arrangement.

Less probable arrangements

There are many less probable arrangements. They have more important shorcomings than the suggested which should not be evaluated alone but in comparison with the rest.

Almost certain 88,2%

Turkey, Central Asia, Azerbaijan can be in Coalition B. For 88,2% of countries/areas placement in a Coalition is almost certain. The rest can be decided in the future.

Solving three problems

The proposed arrangement is the best but there is a big problem, Western Europe and two smaller, Turkey, Israel. North America could assist in solving the big problem.

Basis for exchanges 2

Turkey-ACA exchange has pros and cons. If Western Europeans get India and Mercosur, they should be very satisfied. It is debatable if Oceania should be in C or in D.

Basis for exchanges

The proposed arrangement is as good as it can get but it can serve as basis for exchanges. Western Europeans should pay a large amount of money for the modifications they want.

Active is limited

Western Europe accepted four Coalitions. They can't be proactive or reactive. They can only let the decision makers know their preferences and lure them with rewards.

A good arrangement

The arrangement of previous article is very good for all sides. Divisions are recommended. Modifications can be made but are not necessary. There should be agreement.

BRICS placement

Nine of the eleven BRICS countries can be in Coalitions B-D. Western Europe will be with India in A. All American countries will be in C with most of Subsaharan Africa.

RIC and partners

BRICS have half the world's population but aren't in a continuous area. Instead of Mercosur, Arab countries can be included. Eastern Europe can replace North Africa.

BRIC and partners

In the minds of those that have Cold War mentality, there can be two sides. One side could be China's and India's Coalition. These could be formed according to BRICS.

Eastern Europe's placement

The best option is to have Russia with Eastern Europe in a Coalition without China or N. America. Alternatively Russia can be with China and the rest with N. America.

Choose the poles

There are different reasonings to choose the four poles. It is the first and most important step. Countries/areas will join ASAP. Coalitions can be incomplete for long.

Liberation from Hungarians

The Hungarian tribes oppress people eventhough they no longer exist. Russia may assist Ukraine to take Hungary in order end the war and have good relations in the future.

Opportunity in Hungary 2

Taking Hungary may seem extreme but it is reasonable and should be done long ago. Greco-Thraco-Illyro-Slavs will be liberated from Asian rule. An anomaly will be fixed.

Opportunity in Hungary

Hungary doesn't want to be with Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries. The rest have every right to claim and take the land. It is an opportunity, especially for Ukraine.

Scroll to Top