Give them North Africa
Give them North Africa
There were some problems with the way Coalitions were completed in Appendix 52B. The percentage of Coalition C is low, 23,2%. Also Oceania could be placed in Coalition D because it is next to Indonesia - ASEAN and already has close relations with Japan. If Oceania is in D, C should get more in Subsahara (or North) Africa. But if they do not accept that, British Isles should be in C and SFA in A.
However if SFA (Scandinavia - Finland - Austria) are already in the pole of D, it won't be possible. Oceania is probably better placed in D. Ashmore Reef (Australia) to Rote Island (Indonesia) distance is 145 km. Australia is 9.129 km from Hawaii and 12.750 km from Chile. So it would be better to have Oceania in D and British Isles in C. It is good for UK to be in C, since it will have a large part of Subsahara Africa. UK had colonies there and retains relations.
However, it is quite possible that SFA may prefer to be the leaders of the leaders in Coalition D, instead of Germany's satelite states in Coalition A. Is there a solution? Actually, it would be possible to have SFA and Australia in Coalition D. Furthermore, SFA do not have to decide right away. We can take the arrangement of Appendix 50 as basis and have only SFA placement QUESTIONABLE.
SFA could be placed in A or D. British Isles will be in C and Oceania in D. If SFA are with Westerrn Europe in A, the percentages are; A 25,1%, B 26,1%, C 24%, D 24,9%. This is shown in Appendix 50. If SFA is in D, the percentages for D and A become 25,4% and 24,6%. These are within 0,5% range which is certainly acceptable. SFA could decide whenever they want regarding their placement.
Western Europe (the large countries) lost the "war". Their highly defective plan from the Dark Ages lost and AntiNWO's spectacular plan prevailed. Even if they are losers, the percentage of their Coalition A would be higher than that of North America's Coalition C. Furthermore, they may be getting a very good deal for losers. This will be done not because they won or are nice people but for reasons that will be explained.
Western European (mainly the large countries) NWO is truly a cabal of psychopaths. NWO's plan is Western European. Sometime in the Dark Ages they came up with their insane plan. Since then, they have caused endless problems to Eastern Europe and the rest of the world in order to attain one of the greatest human stupidities. The demise of Byzantine Empire, paneuropean Napoleonic wars, World War ll, the wars in Yugoslavia, the war in Ukraine are among endless horrible things these psychopaths have done.
For a thousand years, these evil monsters have been trying to materialize their insanity. They kept failing because their plan is highly defective.Western European NWO is the main opponent of AntiNWO's plan. Even if Western Europe lost the "war", AntiNWO may try to make them satisfied so that they do not create obstacles anymore and no valuable time will be wasted.
Western Europe is the main problem. Two smaller problems are Turkey and Israel. There is fear that Western European NWO psychopaths will create obstacles to AntiNWO's magnificent plan. Eventually, it is certain that AntiNWO's spectacular plan will be implemented. But much valuable time could be lost with the barriers that these psychopaths, these truly bad people may rise.
One option is to give them what they asked for. They asked for India and Mercosur and they get only India. If they also get Mercosur, they should be satisfied and stop causing problems to Eastern Europe and the world. A better option is to give them something better than what they asked for. Mercosur is far from Western Europe. North Africa is close to Western Europe and has energy resources.
The distance from Spain to Morocco at Gibraltar straits (14 km) is less than half the distance from England to France at Dover straits (34 km). Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia were French colonies. Libya was Italian colony. French and Italy retain some relations with these countries. North Africa is also closer than the five Asian countries (Bangladesh, Nepal etc) that were previously included in Coalition A. These are next to India.
But they are also next to ASEAN. So they can be in Coalition D if North Africa is in A with Western Europe. The two areas have almost equal population. North Africa has 223,55 million while the five Asian countries (Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldives) have 224,22 million. The percentages of the Coalitions will not change with this exchange. In that case, Israel could also be included in A since it is next to Egypt.
The Coalition of Table A in Appendix 50 has 26,1% which is high. To be precise, the percentage is 26,0659%. No more countries can be added. It is questionable if Armenia and Georgia can be included in the Coalition. Together, their percentage is 0,0844%. If they are added to the Coalition, the percentage will increase to 26,1503%. Although it is not much, it is not certain whether the rest will allow even a small increase.
Soviet Union (USSR) included Russia, Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Armenia, Georgia, Baltic countries (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), Central Asian countries (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan), Azerbaijan. Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) was the successor entity of USSR. Baltic countries refused to join from start. Georgia withdrew and Moldova has announced intention to withdraw. Ukraine is not an active member but has not withdrawn.
Althouth it is debatable if Armenia and Georgia could be included in the Coalition of Table A in Appendix 50, it is certain that Ukraine and Moldova will not be included. There may be other reasons but only the high percentage of Coalition A is enough. Moldova has population lower than Armenia but it is located after Ukraine which is the most populous Eastern European country after Russia.
An arrangement is presented in Appendix 53. North Africa and Israel are in Coalition A with Western Europe. Armenia and Georgia are in B with most of CIS countries. British Isles are in C. Oceania and SFA are in D. The percentages are; A 24,7%, B 26,2%, C 23,9%, D 25,2%. If SFA are included in A, the percentages of A and D will reverse and become 25,2% and 24,7%. Also some SFA countries could be in D and the rest in A.
However, if Western Europe gets North Africa, Coalition D should get SFA (Scandinavia - Finland - Austria). It is only fair. A , C and D will have a part in Africa. A will have North Africa, C two thirds of Subsahara and D one third of Subsahara. We should remind that Subsahara has the highest population growth. Therefore, the percentage of C should be a little higher with recent data and increase in the future.