Redefining the poles
Redefining the poles
Russia must make a decision soon. Either it will be with Eastern Europe or with China, Iran and other countries as presented in Table A of Appendix 50. Russia seems very attached to China and Iran. So it is quite possible that they will choose to be with them, in Coalition B. Actually that would make things much easier. However, the poles should be redefined.
The leaders of AntiNWO's plan are North America, Eastern Europe, China. Western Europe is the main opponent. Turkey is also a major opponent, after Western Europe. The leaders of AntiNWO's plan have the right to be the poles, that will gather the rest of the countries/areas. China's Coalition would be complete with 26,1%. There will be no need to gather countries/areas. Without China, the remaining leaders are North America and Eastern Europe.
According to a reasoning that has a lot of support, the most advanced areas of the world should be in different Coalitions with less advanced areas and assist them in their development. The Top 50 countries with the highest per capita income (ppp) are presented in "Advanced poles". They most advanced areas are a) North America b) Western Europe c) Eastern Europe d) Eastern Pacific (Japan, S. Korea, Australia, N. Zealand).
There are three Coalitions left. China's Coalition would be complete if Russia chooses to be with China and Iran. A very important step is to choose the poles. If this is done, half of the task would have been accomplished. Having Russia with China and Iran, requires to make certain changes. Without Russia, Eastern Europe is not strong enough to be a pole.
However, it can become stronger and be a pole, by adding some areas. Scandianavia, Finland, Austria (SFA) could be included and be with Eastern Europe the pole. Scandinavian countries are Sweden, Norway, Denmark. Without Russia and Belarus, Eastern Europe's population is only 178 million. With SFA, it becomes 215 million. This must be compared to the other two poles. It is shown in Appendix 52.
One pole would be North America (USA, Canada). Their population is 375 million. Western Europe could be the other pole, not a real one but a pseudo-pole. If Western Europe was not the main opponent of AntiNWO's magnificent plan, it could be a real pole. A pseudo-pole, gathers the leftovers, after the two real poles, North America and Eastern Europe, have chosen the countries/areas they want in their Coalition.
In many previous arrangements, we have included British Isles (UK and Ireland) with North America. However, in this case, they should be with Western Europe, for population equality reasons. Without SFA and with British Isles, the population of Western Europe is 382 million which is very close to that of North America. Eastern Europe - SFA pole is a lot below that.
Another area should be added to make the population more equal to that of the other two poles, North America and Western Europe. There are two options. One option is to add most of the countries in Arab Peninsula and Turkey. Almost all are in Top 50. The population would be 368 million. Option 2 is to add Japan and S. Korea and the population in that case becomes 391 million.
The first step is to make SFA agree to be a pole with Eastern Europe. Without Russia, they will be more willing to do that. If they are placed with WESTERN EUROPE, they will be Germany's SATELITE STATES. If they are with Eastern Europe, they can be the LEADERS of the LEADERS. With Eastern Europe, they can be the pole (leader) of Coalition D.
Eastern Europe is an advanced area compared to the rest of the world. However Scandinavian countries, Finland, Austria are more advanced than Eastern European countries. They have higher per capita income. So they could have an important or leading role inside the pole. That would be something very essential for small countries, like all SFA are.
Other arguments have been presented in "Nordic - Austrian placement". Finland, most of Sweden and northern Norway are geographically in Eastern Europe. Sweden and Norway have significant Uralic ancestry and Finland much higher. All Eastern Europe has some Ural-altaic ancestry. Austria is closer genetically to Eastern Europe. A large part of Austria was Greco-Thraco-Illyrian territory. SFA can still maintain good relations with Germany but will be independent and the leaders of the leaders.
Once SFA are convinced to be the leaders of the leaders, together with Eastern Europe, they will choose the other area that would supplement the pole. If we have the three poles, the rest will be much easier. North America and SFA - Eastern Europe will gather the areas/countries that they want in Coalitions C and D. Western Europe will get the rest in Coaliiton A.
Suppose that SFA can't be convinced to be a pole with Eastern Europe. There are other ways to have a strong pole. Option 2 would have to be chosen. In addition to Japan, S. Korea, Oceania (Australia, N. Zealand, Papua) will be included as pole. The population of Pole D will slightly increase to 398 million since Oceania's population is a little larger than SFA's. Western Europe's population would become 418 million, with SFA.
That would be a good arrangement. Eastern Europe can not be with Western, if Russia is not included. Furthermore, Eastern Europe is an advanced area and a leader in AntiNWO's plan. So Eastern Europe should be the pole of Coalition D, eventhough Russia does not participate. In order to become a pole, Eastern Europe needs to become stronger by adding more areas in the pole.
We stated in the previous article that the broad guidelines of the arrangement should be decided in 2026. It is not necessary to make that decision in a few weeks. Although not necessary, it is possible to make the decision in a few weeks. Basically, Russia has to make the decision. As matters stand currently, the Coalition of Table A in Appendix 50 has good chances to happen.
Uncertainty is not good. The sooner this matter is settled, the better for every country in the world. All Russians have to do is finalize the decision everybody else expects they will make. Probably they will decide to be with China and Iran. No more countries can be added in that Coalition because the percentage is already 26,1%. It is debatable if Georgia and Armenia can be included eventhough their population is small.
After Russia decides to be with China and Iran, things will be easy. If SFA can be convinced to be the pole with Eastern Europe, it will be good. They will choose the other area that will be in the pole, option 1 or option 2. If SFA are not convinced, there will be no problem. Japan, S. Korea and Oceania will be included. Half of the task will be accomplished. Subsequently, it will be easy for the three poles to gather countries/areas in their Coalitions.