Advanced poles
Advanced poles
In "Four poles", we presented the thirty largest economies, measured by GDP in purchasing power parity (ppp). The size of the economy is determined by a) population b) per capita income. The population has a big effect on the size of the economy. All countries in top 30 have large populations. The size of the economy is not an indicator of a country's economic development.
Per capita income is an indicator of a country's development. We get GDP per capita (ppp) by dividing GDP (ppp) by the population, GDP per capita = GDP / population or GDP = GDP per capita X population. All economically developed countries have high per capita incomes. But countries that are less developed can have high income if they have abudance of natural resources like oil or natural gas.
Economic and technological development are two different things that are closely related. Generally, countries that are technologically developed have high per capita income. But there are cases of countries that are technologically developed but do not have high income. One example is China. Although it is advanced technologically, in terms of per capita income it is close to the world's average.
Which areas of the world are economically developed? According to World Bank, the top 25 countries with the highest per capita income (ppp) are; Luxembourg, Singapore, Ireland, Qatar, Norway, Switzerland, Brunei, USA, Netherlands, Guyana, Denmark, Iceland, UAE, San Marino, Germany, Belgium, Andora, Saudi Arabia, Austria, Australia, Sweden, Malta, Bahrain, Canada, Finland.
The next 25 are; France, Cyprus, Italy, UK, South Korea, Spain, Czechia, Slovenia, Israel, New Zealand, Lithuania, Japan, Kuwait, Portugal, Poland, Estonia, Romania, Croatia, Hungary, Russia, Slovakia, Greece (Hellas), Turkey, Latvia, Oman. So these are the world's top 50 countries with the highest per capita income (ppp). IMF gives a similar list. There are some differences in the ranking.
Top 50 are roughly one quarter of all the countries in the world. Three quarters of the world, in terms countries, are below that. Top 50 can be considered the advanced part of the world. However, there are a few countries that owe their high per capita income to the abudance of natural resources, mainly oil or natural gas. Without these, they would be poor.
Which are the areas of the world that have the more advanced countries? The top 50 are concentrated in North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe and Eastern Pacific (Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand). These are the most advanced areas of the world. The rest of the world is poorer and some parts are very poor. The poorest area is Subsaharan Africa.
What is the solution to world's poverty? According to NWO, people from poor areas should migrate to the rich areas and this will solve the problem. North America (USA - Canada) has 4,7% of the world's population, Western Europe has 5,3%, Eastern Europe 4,2% and Eastern Pacific 2,7%. The total is around 16,9%. NWO wants the other 83,1% to migrate to the most advanced areas.
NWO's supporters are either big idiots or big liars. If they really believe that this is the solution to the problem, they are big idiots. If they know very well that this is not the solution to the problem but support that for their own reasons, they are big liars. In any case, people should not take NWO supporters seriously. The world is very sick. NWO is a very bad disease and AntiNWO is the cure.
More advanced areas should support less advanced in their development but in a different way. More advanced areas should be the leaders or poles of the four Coalitions. They should gather in their Coalitions less advanced areas of the world and assist them in their development. Based on that reasoning, the four leaders or poles should be a) North America b) Western Europe c) Eastern Europe d) Eastern Pacific.
The problem is that Western Europe is the main supporter of NWO's ridiculous plan and the main opponent of AntiNWO's magnificent plan. They can't be leaders in a plan that they strongly oppose. Also China is the world's largest economy, 50% larger (ppp) than the second, USA. It is also very developed technologically. So China should be a pole, even if in terms of per capita income it is not in top 50.
Eastern Pacific is not a leader in AntiNWO's plan. They are not opposing it but they have not been supporting it so far. However, there have been some talks between Eastern Europe and Eastern Pacific that went well. It is possible to have Eastern Europe - Eastern Pacific as one pole but this has not been decided yet. The other alternative for Eastern Pacific is to be in China's Coalition.
India has low per capita income but it is the world's third largest economy and in the future it will be second. Some people believe that India should be a pole. Most likely, India will be with Western Europe, unless USA wants to have the least invlolvement in world affairs. With India and Western Europe, the Coalition will be almost full. They can decide together which area of the world they want to add in their Coalition.
This has to do also with how big Western Europe will be. If Western Europe includes British Isles (UK - Ireland) and Scandinavia - Finland - Austria (SFA) they won't be able to have Mercosur+. They will be able to have North Africa or another area with roughly equal population. If USA decides to include Subsaharan Africa in its Coalition, it is very likely that UK would want to be included as well, so it will not be with the rest of Western Europe.
NWO idiots or liars placed Western Europe with Eastern in European Union. Eastern Europe is less advanced than Western but compared to the rest of the world, it is an advanced area. Eastern Europe does not need assistance in developing. As a matter of fact, participation in EU is very harmful. It hurts Eastern Europe's further development and growth.
During communist era, almost all Eastern Europe was in Eastern Bloc, except Greece. Eastern European communist countries had remarkable industry. In order to achieve high income, a large percentage in high productivity sectors is required. Generally, industry is high productivity. Examples of low productivity sectors are tourism and agriculture.
Greece was the only Eastern European country that was not in Eastern Bloc. It became a member of EU. That was a colossal mistake and a huge anomaly. There is no wonder that Greece was the only country in EU that defaulted. Western European NWO convinced pro-EU idiots or traitors to abandon their industry which was high productivity and focus on low productivity sectors like tourism and agriculture.
Although Eastern Europe had remarkable industry, it did not have high income because of communism. All they had to do was to adjust their industry to the market system. Instead they participated in EU which is worse than communism. However, it is never too late. Eastern Europe, separately from Western, will be one of the poles that will assist less advanced areas of the world in their development.