Nordic-Austrian placement

Western Europe has more population than Eastern. Western Europe's is almost four hundred and twenty (420) million while Eastern's three hundred and thirty five (335) million, including Georgia and Armenia. Suppose we have two Groups in Europe. If ACA (Azerbaijan and Central Asian countries) are added to Eastern European Group, the two Groups have roughly equal population.

Otherwise, some Western European countries will have to be added to eastern European Group to bring the populations of the two Groups more even. There are mainly two ways this can be done. Either Scandinavian countries and Austria or Italy will be added in eastern Group. This is shown in Appendix 29. In Table A, Scandinavian countries and Austria are added while in Table B Italy is added.

To be precise, Scandinavia is only Sweden, Norway, Denmark. Nordic countries are Scandinavian plus Finland and Iceland. Most people erroneously consider Finland in Scandinavia as well. We have intentionally done that mistake because it is a wrong but common belief. Iceland is next to Greenland and will probably be in North American Group. We will use the term Nordic for Scandinavia-Finland, without the inclusion of Iceland.

Some people believe that it is impossible to have Nordic countries and Austria (NA) separated from Germany because they are close allies. Every issue can be viewed from different angles. It is the same with this one. From one angle, NA are allies of Germany and they should be in the same Group with Germany. But viewed from other angles, they could be in a different group.

Or to state it differently, there are pros and cons for every side, if Scandinavia-Finland and Austria (SFA) are placed in eastern Group. There are reasons that are in favor of their inclusion in eastern Group and reasons that are against it. First and most importantly, WESTERN EUROPEANS will NOT PARTICIPATE in the DECISION MAKING regarding Plan B2's grouping. These are the CONSEQUENECES for SUPPORTING with MANIC OBSESSION a HIGHLY DEFECTIVE PLAN from the DARK AGES that has FAILED TREMENDOUSLY.

Scandinavia-Finland and Austria (SFA) should consider their interests, not Germany's. There are many benefits from their participation in eastern Group (Table A, Appendix 29). Scandinavia-Finland are somewhat isolated in the most northern part of Europe. They have access to Baltic Sea and North Atlantic. With their participation in eastern Group, SFA  get easy access to Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, Caspian Sea (which is a big lake), Pacific Ocean, Far East.

An EXTREMELY IMPORTANT BENEFIT is that they will be BRUSSELS FREE, no longer under the EXTREMELY HARMFUL CONTROL of Brussels. At this point, we should note that Denmark, Sweden, Finland and Austria are EU members but Norway is not. Nevertheless, eventually, it may have to become a meber in a Group, if all the other countries are.

Being under the contol of Brussels is horrible for all countries. It is worse for those countries that do not have much power to have an impact on Brussels' decisions. Large countries like Germany, France, UK (when it was an EU member), Italy, Spain have more impact. Scandinavia-Finland and Austria (SFA) are among the countries that do not have much impact on Brussels' decisions.

Suppose that there will be the two Groups as in Table A of Appendix 29. The western will be a lot like EU. In the eastern, AntiNWO's superb organizational and economic model will be used, which gives a lot more independence to the countries. There will be cooperation among countries, mainly economic and other as well (scientific, educational etc). But there will be no unnecessary packaging, like in that horrible monstrosity EU. 

Western Europe has four relatively large countries, Germany, France, UK, Italy. Spain could also be added. Scandinavia-Finland and Austria (SFA) are small countries. There are no big countries in Subgroup B1 of Table A -  Appendix 29. There are many small countries. The five largest countries are Poland, Romania, Czechia, Sweden, Hellas (Greece). The last three have around ten (10) million people.

In EU, SFA are GERMANY's SATELLITE STATES. The same will happen if they are in any other Group together with Germany. In Subgroup B1, compared to the rest of the countries, they have much higher per capita income. They will be respected by the rest, because of that. This will not be the case if they are with Western European countries which have also high per capita income.

So although they are small countries, in the relatively autonomous Subgroup B1, they can have a much more important role, compared to being together with Western European countries. They could even CONTEND LEADERSHIP ROLE. This would be entirely impossible with Western European countries but it would be possible in relatively autonomous Subgroup B1. With Western European countries, they will be Germany's vassal states.

Countries in Regions will have closer cooperation. In Region B1a, they will be together with German Wannabes, Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries. If this happens, German Wannabes will become Scandinavian-Finnish- Austrian Wannabes. Instead of German, they will want to be Scandinavian-Finnish-Austrian. Region B1a will be Scandinavian-Finnish-Austrian with original Scandinavian-Finnish-Austrian and Wannabes Scandinavian-Finnish-Austrian.

In eastern Group, SFA can retain close relations with Germany but they will be a lot more independent from Germany. Germany may even end up supporting the division of Table A in Appendix 29. If they have common sense, something questionable, they will realize that EU is DEAD, definitely FINISHED. EU IST KAPUTT. In the three Group division (Table B, Appendix 26), there are some Eastern European countries in Germany's Group.

In the two (or four) Group division, there are no Eastern European countries in Germany's Group. If Germany wants to be somehow involved in Eastern Europe, it will have to do it through other countries with which it has close relations. German Wannabes are pro-German but SFA are even more pro-German. Together SFA and German Wannabes are more powerful and form a relatively autonomous pro-German Region B1a, in eastern Group, right next to Germany.

In that sense, SFA could be more useful to Germany in eastern Group than being together in the same Group, if we take for GRANTED that there will be NO EU, something that is CERTAIN. SFA could be the CONNECTION between eastern and western Group. Eventhough Finland, Sweden and Austria are geographically in Eastern Europe, they are certainly Western European countries. Austria is genetically between Western and Eastern Europe, closer to Eastern.

Denmark, Norway and Sweden are predominantly Germanic (Viking) countries. But Norway and Sweden have significant Uralic ancestry. It is more in the northern part. Finland's main ancestry is Uralic and secondary is Germanic (Viking). Russia and Baltic countries have considerable Uralic ancestry. Also Kievan Russes had some Viking (Germanic) ancestry. Russia, Belarus and Ukraine originate from Kievan Russes. All these relate somehow Norway, Sweden and Finland to the most northern part of Eastern Europe.

Unlike Italy, SFA were not founding members of EU. Austria, Finland and Sweden were the last Western European countries to be added in EU. Denmark should be placed together with the rest of Scandinavian countries. SFA role in EU has been peripheral, not central, not important. In conclusion, the division of Europe presented in Table A of Appendix 29 may be a good one, after a more careful examination.