Broad guidelines in 2026

In the two previous articles and in Appendixes 49 and 50, two arrangements were presented that currently seem to have lower chances than the one proposed in Appendix 48. However, things can change in the future. The less probable could gain support and become more probable. We should emphasize that there can be further exchanges or changes in the two arrangements ( Appendixes 49 and 50).

These are not all the proposals regarding the arrangement of countries/areas in four Coalitions. There are MANY DIFFERENT OPINIONS and we can't present all of them. For instance, according to an opinion, the most advanced areas in the world should form one Coalition. The Top 50 countries with the highest per capita income (ppp) were mentioned in "Advanced poles".

The most advanced areas are North America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Eastern Pacific (Japan, S. Korea, Australia, N. Zealand). All together, have only 17% of the world's population which is roughly equal to China's or India's. If most countries of Arab Peninsula, Israel, Turkey and Kazakhstan are added, the percentage becomes 19,2%. More countries/areas should be included to reach 25%.

Although this scenario has some pros, it is unlikely because it has serious shortcomings. The most advanced countries have somewhat similar economies. From that point of view, cooperation may be easier. Also there is spatial proximity. Almost all (except Oceania) are in the Northern hemisphere. The Coalition would be a continuous area that would spread from North America to the Pacific, through Western Europe, Eastern Europe.

With the exception of Japan and S. Korea, the rest of the areas are European (Western and Eastern Europe) or descent mainly from Europeans (North America, Australia, N. Zealand). However, this Coalition would be too powerful, compared to the other three. The effort should be to have four Coalitions that do not have very big differences in terms of power. Also, more advanced areas should be with less advanced and assist them in their development. It is better if the most advanced areas are the leaders (poles) of different Coaliitons.

In the proposed arrangement (Appendix 48) that currently seems more probable, the placement of 11,8% (in terms of population) is uncertain. Suppose that the 88,2% that is almost certain becomes certain. There is no need to decide about the uncertain 11,8% soon. Anyway the uncertain areas are placed will be good, as long each Coalition has around 25%, within an acceptable range.

However, we will present a way that seems better. The uncertain areas are in Table A of Appendix 48. UK and Ireland should be in C with North America. Canada, Greenland, Iceland, Ireland, UK are in a row, in the northern Atlantic. UK is not in EU. It had many colonies in Subsahara Africa and retains relations. A large part of Subsahara will be in C. Mercosur, Peru, Chile should be with the rest of the American continent.

Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc are next to India. They should be with India in A. The Coalition will have two continuous areas a) Western Europe b) India and surrounding countries. Australia and N. Zealand are English speaking countries but are far from the rest (English speaking countries). They are very close to Indonesia and have close relations with Japan. Indonesia, ASEAN and Japan, S. Korea will be in D. So Oceania should be in D.

Next is Turkey and Azerbaijan - Cental Asia (ACA). Russia wants to be togeter with ACA but so do Turkey, Iran and China. There is a way to make all sides somewhat satisfied. ACA has six countries. Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan have the largest populations. Together they have 62% of the total ACA population. These two countries can be in D, while the other four and Turkey will be in B with China and Iran.

In this way, ACA will be divided into two parts. Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan are next to China. Turkmenistan and Azerbaijan are next to Iran. Azerbaijan is also next to Turkey and the two countries have close relations. Turkey will have the four ACA countries plus Syria, Lebanon in the same Coalition. Russia will have Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan which is the most populous country in ACA.

Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti, Comoros are in Subsahara Africa and next to Arab Peninsula. They are better placed in D. Scandinavia, Finland, Austria should be with the rest of Western European countries. This arrangement is presented in Appendix 51. However, we should repeat that anyway the uncertain areas are placed in Coalitions will be good and the decision does not have to be made soon.

It is crucial though to DECIDE regarding the BROAD GUIDELINES of the ARRANGEMENT SOON. This does not have to be done in a few weeks but it should be done in a few months, PREFERABLY in 2026. RUSSIA has to MAKE an IMPORTANT DECISION. Will it be in the same Coalition with China, as presented in Appendix 50, or with Eastern Europe, as in all other arrangements?

It is unlikely that Russia can be in the same Coalition with Eastern Europe and China. North America and Western Europe will not accept that. When Russia makes the decision, things will become easier. If Russia is with China, Iran etc (Table A - Appendix 50), there are basically two alternatives. One is to have Eastern Europe and North America in the same Coalition.

EASTERN EUROPE can NOT be with WESTERN if RUSSIA is NOT INCLUDED. The other alternative is the Coalition in Table B of Appendix 50. That may be a COMPROMISING ARRANGEMENT because, China - Russia will certainly not like Eastern Europe to be with North America and may not accept it. With this arrangement, Eastern Europe and the rest of the countries in D are not with North America, Western Europe, China or Russia.

If Russia decides to be with Eastern Europe, there are more decisions that need to be made. Eastern Pacific (Japan, S. Korea, Oceania), ASEAN, Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka etc will have to decide if they want to be with China - India. If this is their decision, the two options of Appendix 49 should be chosen. Otherwise, the choice should be the arrangement in Appendix 48.

There is only ONE CERTAINTY. NWO's very STUPID PLAN is DEAD, already in the TRASH CAN. Uncertainty is not good. There is no need to make a decision regarding the placement of all countries/areas in Coalitions but the broad guidelines should be decided, preferably in 2026. Russia must make first the decision soon. Will it be with China or with Eastern Europe? The rest of the decisions will follow.