RIC and partners

The origins of BRICS are in two forums, RIC (Russia, India, China) and IBSA (India, Brazil, South AFrica). The original members were four, Brazil, Russia, India, China. South Africa was added later. Five more members joined in 2024, Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, Saudi Arabia, UAE. Can all members included in the two Coalitions presented in the previous article and in Appendix 43? The ten countries have a total population of 3.618.269.539 (2022) or 45,44% or the world's.

So they can fit in two Coalitions. But there can't be many more countries included. Indonesia is in the process of joining. In BRICS site it is mentioned as member. With Indonesia, the population goes upt to 3.896.019.392 (2022) or 48,93% of the world/'s. BRICS have almost half of the world's population. With Indonesia, only 1- 2% can be added to the two Coalitions. There is another problem.

In Table A and Table B of Appendix 43, the countries that are included are in continuous areas. With the exception of Mercosur+, (Brazil, Argentina etc) all the rest of the countries are in one very large continuous area. Table A and Table B could be modified by adding new countries. Others with roughly equal population should be taken out because the two Coalitions are full.

In order to have continuous areas, not all BRICS members can be included in the two Coalitions. Some countries are already in Groups. Brazil is in Mercosur, Indonesia is in ASEAN and Russia is in Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Arab League officially exists since 1945 but it is not very active. Since some countries are already in Groups, the rest of the countries in these Groups should be included.

ASEAN's population is 675.386.969 or 8,48%. If ASEAN is included, areas with roughly equal population should be taken out. It may be easier to add all Arab League countries, since some are already included in Tables A and B. This is shown in Table A of Appendix 43B. The rest of Arab countries are included in two Groups. One Group is North Africa and the other the remaining Arab Peninsula countries.

An area with roughly equal population should be deleted because the two Coalitions are full. Mercosur+ is removed since it has roughly equal population and it is far away. In this case we get a large continuous area that includes all Arab countries and all Muslim countries of Western and Central Asia. In addition to these, China, India, Russia and some smaller countries are included. Since Brazil is out, this is RIC and partners. RIC was one of the two original forums that lead to BRICS.

There may be two problems with this arrangement. Currently, most countries of the Arab Peninsula are slightly against Iran in the war with Israel - USA. According to some media, not only Israel but Saudi Arabia as well had requested USA to attack Iran. Saudi Arabia is the strongest country in Arabian Peninsula. Also Turkey's relations with Saudi Arabia are not so good.

Iran, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Egypt to a lesser extent compete for leadership in the Muslim countries of North Africa, Southwestern and Central Asia. Pakistan also wants to play an important role but it is peripherally located. The largest economies (ppp) are Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Pakistan. The strongest militaries are Turkey, Pakistan, Iran, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Algeria. Relations in Muslim countries are complicated.

This is not a big problem because as it can be seen in Table A of Appendix 43B, Iran and Turkey are in a different Coalition form Saudi Arabia and Egypt. The countries form two Coalitions and one side in the minds of those with Cold War mentality. Another issue is that the two Coalitions in Table A of Appendix 43B have a very large percentage of energy resources, oil and natural gas. The rest may not accept it.

We have made very clear that Western and Eastern Europe can't be in the same Coalition if Russia is not included. This is totally unacceptable. Eastern European AntiNWO is willing to discuss with North America, the possibility of being together the poles of one Coalition, without Russia. This could be acceptable under certain conditions. If this option is not possible for what ever reasons, there are only two alternatives.

As it has been explained, the best alternative is if Eastern Europe, including Russia is the pole of one Coalition, without North America, China or Western Europe. The other alternative that is acceptable is if Eastern Europe is with BRIC or RIC and partners even if North America and Western Europe do not want that. It is not only acceptable but something Eastern European AntiNWO will strive for very hard.

Having Eastern Europe without Russia in the same Coalition with Western is not an option. For a THOUSAND YEARS, WESTERN EUROPEAN NWO has tried to CONQUER or CONTROL Eastern Europe. Western European NWO has placed puppet governments in many Eastern European countries. The only reason these big traitors are in power is because Western European NWO assists them in every possible way.

EASTERN EUROPEAN AntiNWO has DEEP and STRONG HATE for WESTERN EUROPEAN NWO and their PUPPETS. Since the traitors are in power only because they have the support of Western European NWO, Eastern European AntiNWO will seek support elsewhere to LIBERATE from WESTERN EUROPEAN NWO rule, REPLACE and PUNISH their PUPPETS. If North America (USA) is willing to give that support, Eastern European AntiNWO can discuss the details of being in the same Coalition.

Otherwise, EASTERN EUROPEAN AntiNWO will seek SUPPORT from BRIC or RIC (if they are together) in order to DEFEAT PRO-EU TRAITORS and PUNISH them SEVERELY for their TREASON. That should not be difficult at all because Eastern European AntiNWO has already good relations with Russia. If in North America (USA) they do not want Eastern Europe to be with RIC and partners, they should strive to have the North America - Eastern Europe pole.

We should remind that during Cold War, Eastern Europe was on the same side with Russia and China. Greece was the only exception. However Greece is an integral part of Eastern Europe and communism ended. During Cold War, if Greece was with Eastern Europe, it should be communist. In Table B of Appendix 43B, Eastern Europe is included in RIC and partners. An area with roughly the same population should be deleted. In this example it is North Africa but it could be another one.