Groups and Divisions

In NWO's ultra - defective plan, there are four Unions. Their percentage of world's population would be roughly; 1) European 7,5% 2) American 12,5% 3) African 17,5% 4) Asian 62,5%. With today's population, it would be rougly 600, 1.000, 1.400, 5.000 million respectively. Only this is enough to demonstrate how really RIDICULOUS NWO's plan is. Of course, the ERRORS in that great stupidity are INNUMERABLE.

EUROPEAN UNION currently has approximately 450 million and it is a TOTAL CHAOS. One reason is the size but most importatnty what makes EU a total chaos is the way it is organized. Almost EVERYTHING about EU's ORGANIZATION is WRONG. EU is the model for the other three Unions. According to NWO's ultra - defective plan, American, African and Asian Union would be exactly like European.

AntiNWO has two plans. Plan 1 has Coalitions of Groups and Plan 2 Coalitions of Countries. In Plan 1, there are two Groupings, Grouping A and Grouping B. First the countries form Groups and then the Groups form four Coaltions with roughly 25% of the world's population each. Grouping A has 10+2 Groups and Grouping B has 16+2 Groups. The size of a Group in Grouping A is around 500 million. In Grouping B it is 300-400 million.

AntiNWO's Plan 2 is much simpler and a lot more flexible. Instead of Coalitions of Groups, it has four Coalitions of Countries with around 25% of the world's population each. There are NO GROUPS in Plan 2. With today's population, each Coalition would have around 2.000 million or 2 billion. This number is enormous. It would be better to have eight Coalitions and even better to have sixteen.

With eight Coalitions, each Coaltion would have around 1.000 million or 1 billion. With sixteen Coalitions, the size of each Coalition would be 500 million or 0,5 billion. That is the size of the Groups in Grouping A of Plan 1. In Grouping B, it is smaller. Unfortunately, there can BE ONLY FOUR COALITIONS. This resembles NWO's ridiculous plan that has four Unions.

In AntiNWO's plan, the four Coalitions have equal population. In NWO's great stupidity, there are huge differences of population. Asian Union would have eight times more population than European. There is SOMETHING VERY WRONG with ALL NWO's SUPPORTERS. Their BRAINS do NOT FUNCTION WELL, perhaps due to substance abuse or mental illness. They have MENTAL PROBLEMS that do NOT let them THINK CORRECTLY.

Resemblance to NWO's plan is not the reason there must be four Coalitions. The reason is China's and India's population. Each has 17-18% of the world's population, which is around one sixth. If there are six Coalitions, China and India would not have other countries in their Coaltion. If there are eight Coalitions, the other six would have less population than China or India.

There are no Groups in Plan 2 but DIVISIONS and SUBDIVISIONS are HIGHLY RECOMMENDED. They seem NECESSARY, especially in the two Coalitions that will not have China or India. However, DIVISIONS and SUBDIVISIONS are OPTIONAL and something that CONCERNS only EACH Coalition. There can be zero, one, two, three or more levels. Each level can have two or more divisions.

In Plan 1, the basic units are the Groups. Further divisions in Groups are optional. There could be Subgroups and Regions. At a higher level, between Groups and Coalitions, there can be Subcoalitions. In Plan 2, there can be a number of levels. At each level, there can be two or more divisions. It is preferable if the divisions have roughly equal size but not necessary. These will become easier understood with examples.

In Grouping A of Plan 1, there are two Groups in the American continent. One has North American countries, Canada, USA, Mexico. Some small countries could also be added. The other Group has the rest. Both have around 500 million. These two Groups can form a Subcoalition with rougly 1.000 million or 1 billion. In the southern Group, there could be Subgroups based on Mercosur, Parlacen and Andean Community.

In Europe, there are also two Groups in Grouping A of Plan 1. Since Eastern Europe's population is smaller than Western's, some Asian countries are also added in order to make the two Groups roughly equal in terms of population. Western European Group can have two Subgroups (Tables A and B of Appendix 15). In Eastern European Group, there can be two Subgroups with two Regions each (Table B, Appendix 11).

In Plan 2, we do not know how the Coalitions of Countries will be. We have presented several alternatives that currently seem more likely. But it is possible to have eventually an ARRANGEMENT that has NOT been PRESENTED. All we KNOW so far are the POLES of the Coalitions. Three poles would be NORTH AMERICA, CHINA and EASTERN EUROPE. The fourth pole would be Western Europe (pseudo - pole), India or both.

Eastern Europe has not been defined yet as a pole. This will depend on the decision regarding Russia's placement. It is a very important decision that should be taken soon. If Russia - Belarus are in the same Coalition with China, SFA (Scandinavia, Finland, Austria) and PCB (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries) will replace them in the pole of Coalition D.

The POLES will GATHER the REST of the countries/areas in their Coalition. We do not know what the outcome will be. We can't present possible divisions and subdivisions, if the Coalitions are still unknown. We have only given some examples. In "A good arrangement", we explained how Eastern Europe's Coaltion D and North America's Coalition C can have divisions.

Coalition D could have seven divisions; 1) most of Eastern Europe 2) Russia - Belarus with Azerbaijan - Central Asia (Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan) 3) Eastern Pacific (Japan, S. Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Papua) 4) half of ASEAN 5) half of ASEAN 6) Eastern coast of Subsaharan Africa 7) Arab countries.

That is the first level and the number of divisions are seven. We presented a possible second level as well. In D1, Ukraine, Poland, Czechia and Baltic countries can be northern Subdivision D1a. The rest of the Eastern European countries in Division D1 will be southern Subdivision D1b. In D2, Russia - Belarus can be Subdivision D2a and Azerbaijan - Central Asia Subdivision D2b. That would be second level of division with two divisions each.

Obviously, Divisions and Subdivisions will have closer relations. How closer these relations will be and how much independence the Divisions and Subdivisions will have is a matter of internal organization in each Coalition that does not concern the rest. These issues will be resolved in the future. The fist important step is to define the pole of Eastern Europe and the second to agree on the general guidelines.