Details in the future 2
Details in the future 2
In the arrangement presented (Appendix 56), all Arab Peninsula is with Iran. The largest country of Arab Peninsula in terms of population is Yemen. The strongest economically and militarily is Saudi Arabia. Yemen has good relations with Iran. Saudi Arabia - Iran relations are complex. The two countries, with Turkey and Egypt to a lesser extent have been competing for leadership in the region.
Turkey is the weakest competitor, eventhough it has the largest economy and the stongest military. The reason is Turkey's obsession to PLAY ALL SIDES. Sometimes it works well but often it does not. Turks are not the only smart people in the world. If this was a good strategy for all occassions, all countries would be always following it. With this strategy, Turkey has seriously harmed itself.
The rest of the Muslim countries in the region, righfully do not trust Turkey since it has been desperately trying to join EU since 1987 and is a member of NATO. Those that PLAY ALL SIDES often END UP ALONE. This seems to have happened with Turkey. Eventually Turkey will be placed in a Coalition but currently all are reluctant to have Turkey with them. There is distrust of Turkey in all sides.
There could be an exchange, Turkey for the four Central Asian countries (Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan). Turkey would be with Iran and Saudi Arabia. Egypt, Lebanon, Syria will remain in D. Israel has bad relations with Lebanon and Syria. With Egypt, relaitons are not bad but not good either. Generally, Israel has problems with most countries around it. The big problem is Western Europe.
Turkey and Israel are two smaller problems. Israel could be included in Coalition C with USA or even be US territory. Viewing it from one angle, it would be difficult to have Israel with Lebanon and Syria in the same Coaltion. However, if they are in the same Coalition, it is not necessary to have good or close relations. They can have relations with other countries. From another angle, if they are in the same Coaltion, it would be easier to have peace.
In Syria and Lebanon, there are many sides. Syria's previous government had good relations with Iran and Russia. Current de facto government seems to have good relations with Turkey. According to some sources, Turkey's assistance was crucial. But there are other sides that have good relations with other countries. Something similar is in Lebanon. Hezbollah and its supporters have good relations with Iran. But there are other sides too.
The main decision is Russia's. There are only two alternatives. The BEST is RUSSIA and BELARUS to be with the rest of EASTERN EUROPE. The worse is Russia and Belarus to be separated from the rest or Eastern Europe. It is worse than the first one but it is not a bad alternative. Eastern Europe will NOT be with Western or North America. It will be a NEUTRAL AREA between Western Europe and Russia.
Obviously, Western European NWO puppets will have to be replaced. It they remain, Eastern Europe will not be a neutral area. Pro-EU parties in Eastern Europe take orders from Western European NWO. They deceive Eastern European citizens that participation in EU is beneficial. In reality it is very harmful because Eastern European countries are less competitive.
For a thousand years, Western European NWO has been trying to conquer or control Eastern Europe because according to their stupid plan, Eastern Europe will be with Western in European Union. Currently they control Eastern Europe through EU, their puppets, media control, propaganda etc. Nazis placed puppet governments with local traitors in the occupied territory.
Western European NWO is doing the same thing. After all, it was Western European NWO behind the Nazis. They put Hitler and Nazis in power for European Union and Global Government. EASTERN EUROPE has to STAY as FAR AWAY as possible from WESTERN. So why should Poland - Czechia - Baltic (PCB) countries be together with Western Europe in the same Coalition?
We did not suggest that PCB should be with Western Europe. On the contrary, we stated that they shouldn't. Having PCB and Western Europe in the same Coalition is WRONG and DIFFICULT but POSSIBLE. May be PCB want to be controlled by Western Europe. May be they want to have puppet governments that take orders from Western European NWO.
There is a lot of DISTRUST of WESTERN EUROPE all over the world after what they have done in Eastern. There is rightful fear that they will try to control their Coalition and impose their will. So, it would be better to have countries/areas in their Coalition that are FAR AWAY. It will be more difficult to control far away areas. Mercosur, India and the countries next to India (Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldives) are far away.
North Africa is close and Eastern Europe even closer. Generally, there is much distrust of Western Europe all over the world. But there are two areas that are willing to deal with Western European NWO psychopaths. These are India and Mercosur. So we have volunteers that for whatever reasons do not have distrust of Western Europe and are willing to be together with them.
In addition, this is what Western Europeans asked for. There are certainly many advantages in placing Western Europe together with India and Mercosur. On the other hand, Mercosur should be better included with the rest of the American continent. So a good alternative to Mercosur is the five countries that are next to India (Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldives). In this way, India will have some countries close to it.
This Coalition has been in several of the arrangements we presented. Scandinavia - Finland - Austria (SFA) are with Western Europe but not British Isles. The percentage of the Coalition is 25,1%. It is very close to the target, which is 25%. In AntiNWO, all agree that this should be Western Europe's Coalition. But there are two different opinions on how to deal with the big problem, Western Europe.
The arrangment of international relations will stay for many decades and probably centruries. According to one opinion, it is worth it to wait for a while in order to have the best possible arrangement. As matters stand currently, it is best is to place Western Europe with India and the five countries next to India (Bangladesh, Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bhutan, Maldives).
According to another opinion, uncertainty is bad for everyone. A good deal should be given to Western Europe so that they stop causing problems and AntiNWO's magnificent plan can proceed the soonest possible. A good deal is what they asked for, India and Mercosur. It may be better if instead of Mercosur they get North Africa. It gets even better for Western Europe if Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries are included.
There are MANY ISSUES that need to be CONSIDERED regarding the ARRANGEMENT. Fortunately, these do NOT have to be RESOLVED NOW. Most likely, China will be with Pakistan and Iran. It is not final but very likely. India has much more chances to be with Western Europe than with Eastern. The most important decision is Russia's placement. It will determine to a large extent the general guidelines.