Applied model comparison

We have mentioned it a few times in previous articles but we need to devote an article on that issue to make it stand out. It is probably the most essential argument for partitioning Europe. Evil Union is the first step in NWO’s evil plan. EU is an experiment and EU citizens are laboratory animals. The citizens in some countries have been sacrificed for the shake of the experiment.

Once EU model becomes successful it will be applied to Asian, American and African Union. The problem is that EU model has been a disaster and demonic ultraglobalists persist in a faulty model. The experiment has failed miserably and has proven disastrous for some countries. Nevertheless, NWO media brainwash those citizen’s that their lives have been ruined by disastrous EU experiment.

A theoretic discussion on NWO – EU disastrous model is not completely useless. It is useful to find out the fatal mistakes made in EU experiment. A theoretical discussion will never show which model is better. Only application of models can do that. The more alternative models to EU’s disaster can be applied, the better it would be because the best model can in this way emerge.

That is why it is extremely important that EU is partitioned in at least three parts where different models can be apllied. EU’s failed experiment can serve as an example to avoid. If there are any right things identified, these could be implemented. EU has created a disaster and these monsters continue to make the disaster even bigger.

An applied comparison is necessary in order to determine the best model for groups of countries. The British model of a “Union” prefers much more autonomy and perhaps that was the reason that resulted in Brexit. If British could manage their own affairs the way they wanted, without an evil corrupt institution imposing their will on them, perhaps there wouldn’t even be a discussion for Brexit.

It is possible to have even looser relations with more national autonomy than the British model. Probably there will not be any groups’ capital like Brussels, where a centralization of power takes place at the expense countries’ sovereignty. Evil Union started in the 50’s. There were telephones at that time but long-distance calling was not that easy. The development of Internet has changed matters considerably.

People communicate the same way, regardless if they are in the same city or thousands of miles away. They use the same digital ways of communication even if they are in the same building, email, messaging, telephone, video calls. It is not necessary anymore to bring tens of thousands of people together in one place like Brussels. EU has been left behind by technological developments. They are dinosaurs that will become extinct.

An agency or even a ministry can be formed in each country that would deal with matters of the group. That can be complemented with annual, semi – annual or quarterly meetings of Presidents/Prime Ministers and Ministers. One question is whether forming groups of countries ("Unions") is useful. The are some valid arguments supporting that shortcomings weigh more than benefits. Another question is how these groups will be and the answer to this question answers the first question as well.

Not only in this matter but almost in every issue there are pros and cons. Whether benefits from forming groups of countries outweigh shortcomings is greatly influenced by how these groups are formed and how loose the relations are within the groups. We can be arguing endlessly theoretically on which model is better but there is only one way to find out, by applying the different models.