Coalitions of Groups

Coalitions of Groups

In NWO's extremely malfunctioning plan, there are four Unions, European, African, American, Asian. The population differences are big. Asian Union has more than seven times larger population than European. The other two, African and American, are in between the smallest (European) and the largest (Asian). There is lack of homogeneity in Unions which grows as the population increases.

AntiNWO's Groups are more and smaller. But the two European Groups, Western and Eastern, are not much smaller than EU. There are 10+2 Groups. The ten Groups have roughly equal population, close to half a billion. They are as homogeneous as possible. In order to have more homogeneity, the Groups would have to be smaller. Instead of having smaller Groups, there is an option for further division in the Groups with Subgroups and Regions.

Suppose that Groups' population was decreased to roughly a quarter of a billion. There would be three more countries that could not fit in a Group, USA, Indonesia, Pakistan. They are in third, fourth and fifth place with populations 340, 284 and 241 million respectively. It is also doubtful that Nigeria (224 mn) and Brazil (213 mn) could fit in a group.

AntiNWO's plan has 10+2 Groups. There are ten groups with roughly half a billion, plus China and India. Ideally, China and India should be in a Group. It is a fact that these two countries have enormous population and roughly equal, a little more than one billion four hundred million (1,4 bn). China was in first place but recently India surpassed it. Each country's population is more than four times larger than USA's which is in third position.

For the sake of argument, let's assume that the Groups in AntiNWO's plan were four, like NWO's four Unions. Unlike in NWO's ridiculous plan, the four Groups would have roughly equal population. Since the world's population is eight billion (8 bl), each one of AntiNWO's four Groups should have roughly two billion (2bn) people. This is an option in AntiNWO's plan, something to be decided in the future.

There could be four Mega-groups or Coalitions of Groups with roughly two billion people each. In that case, China and India would be in a Coalition with one more Group. So the four Mega-groups or Coalitions of Groups would be; a) China + 1 Group b) India + 1 Group c) 4 Groups d) 4 Groups. Below are only five examples but there are many more alternatives.

Example A

  • 1) China - Northeastern Asia
  • 2) India - Southeastern Asia & Oceania
  • 3) North America - South & Central America - Western Europe - Eastern Europe
  • 4) Southwestern Asia - Arab Group - Northern Subsaharan Africa - Southern Subsaharan Africa

Example B

  • 1) China - Eastern Europe
  • 2) India - Southwestern Asia
  • 3) North America - South & Central America - Northeastern Asia - Southeastearn Asia & Oceania
  • 4) Western Europe - Arab Group - Northern Subsaharan Africa - Southern Subsaharan Africa

Example C

  • 1) China - Northeastern Asia
  • 2) India - Southeastern Asia & Oceania
  • 3) North America - South & Central America - Eastern Europe - Arab Group
  • 4) Western Europe - Southwestern Asia - Northern Subsaharan Africa - Southern Subsaharan Africa

Example D

  • 1) China - Southwestern Asia
  • 2) India - Arab Group
  • 3) North America - Eastern Europe - Southern Subsaharan Africa - Northeastern Asia
  • 4) South & Central America - Western Europe - Northern Subsaharan Africa - Southeastern Asia & Oceania

Example E

  • 1) China - South & Central America
  • 2) India - North America
  • 3) Western Europe - Southwestern Asia - Northern Subsaharan Africa - Southeastern Asia & Oceania
  • 4) Eastern Europe - Arab Group - Southern Subsaharan Africa - Northeastern Asia

There are really ENDLESS WAYS these four Mega-groups or COALITIONS of Groups can be FORMED. In Examples A and B, the Groups in a Coalition are next to each other. Obviously, the two American Groups can't be next to the rest since American continent is separated with two oceans from the rest of the world, Atlantic and Pacific. In examples C, D and E, not all Groups in a Coalition are next to each other.

Many reasonings can be followed in forming the Coalitions. The erroneous assumption many have is that North America should be in the same Coalition with Western Europe because supposedly they are allies. In reality they are ECONOMIC COMPETITORS. They were allies during Cold War but it has ended in the beginning of 1990's. It is reasonable to have NORTH AMERICA and WESTERN EUROPE in different Coalitions.

The Groups that are more supportive of AntiNWO's plan are North America, South & Central America, Eastern Europe and Arab Group. In Example C, these are placed in the same Coalition. According to an opinion, a Coalition should have a mix of Groups in terms of economic advancement. There could be Groups with relatively high, medium and low per capita income.

The two most advanced Groups are North America and Western Europe, in that order. North America has the highest per capita income, higher than Western Europe's, even though Mexico is in it. This is due to USA's high income and large population. In third and fourth place are Eastern Europe and Northeastern Asia. At the lowest position are the two Subsaharan Groups.

A good approach would be to let the Groups DEVELOP RELATIONS among them. This would take some time, perhaps more than a decade. Then, if Coalitions seem to be beneficial, the GROUPS that have CLOSER relations can be in the SAME COALITION. It may be a MISTAKE to try to FORM COALITIONS very soon. First, Groups should be formed and then DEVELOP RELATIONS among them.

When Groups DEVELOP RELATIONS, they should HAVE in MIND that COALITIONS is an OPTION in the FUTURE. Coalitions should be formed only if they are useful. The pros and the cons should be examined carefully and proceed only if pros far outweigh cons. This decision should be made in the future. If Coalitions are formed, the 10+2 COUNCIL will NOT have to CHANGE. The twelve delegates will be in four groups, according to the Coalitions.

AntiNWO's Coalitions are far superior than NWO's Unions. First of all, they have roughly equal population. Even though Coalitions will not be homogeneous, they will consist of homogeneous Groups and even more homogeneous Subgroups and Regions. RELATIONS in COALITIONS will be LOOSE, not as close as in Groups. AntiNWO's plan is far superior than NWO's and it will certainly prevail. The sooner this happens, the better for every one.

Scroll to Top