Compare the two routes

As it has been explained in previous articles there are two main routes to form Eastern European Group. The one that AntiNWO recommends is two autonomous Groups that will merge in the future to become two relatively autonomous subgroups. The other route is Commonwealth of Independent States - CIS enlargement. Gradually, the rest of the countries will be added in CIS.

There are pros and cons in both routes. Different sides have different points of view. What may be a pro for CIS, could be a con for Western European countries. We will compare the two routes, without determining if something has a positive or negative impact because this assessment may be different for different sides. AntiNWO recommends the approach that seems to be best overall, without taking any sides.

This route requires separation of Western European countries from Eastern in EU, as soon as possible. This may be a serious obstacle. Currently, there are NWO governments in many Western and Eastern European countries that are not willing to take one of the three alternatives to separate. Either Eastern or Western countries will have to exit or there may be a decision to split the group into two parts.

As the situation is right now, separation is difficult to happen but this can change in two ways. NWO governments can be convinced to change their position or they will be replaced with AntiNWO governments. Eventually, the second will happen because AntiNWO's plan is people's choice, designed according to what people want. Replacement of NWO governments may take some time though.

There are countries like France where there could be a replacement of government soon. But there are other countries like Germany where this can't happen any time soon. If the separation does not happen soon, CIS enlargement would have to be followed. One way to make NWO governments agree on separation is to convince them that the alternative is worse for them.

Obviously, CIS enlargement gives CIS countries an advantage. They will be the core of Eastern European Group and they will be the ones that will decide when and how they will add the rest of the countries. They will be in charge of the situation. In CIS, the largest and most powerful country is Russia. NWO governments in Western and Eastern Europe are not very fond of Russia.

If they do not support the separation in EU, they give an advantage to Russia and make it a key player in the formation of Eastern European Group. Also, if CIS enlargement is followed, it is uncertain whether there will be eventually two relatively independent Subgroups in Eastern European Group. It is not impossible for that to happen but it is not very likely either.

In the first route, the process itself guarantees that there will be two relatively autonomous Subgroups. If there are no Subgroups, Russia's influence will be bigger. That is also something that NWO politicians and parties do not like. The potential relative autonomy of Subgroup A, makes the influence of Russia lesser and it should be preferable by NWO governments in Western and Eastern Europe.

In the recommended approach, Ukraine and Moldova will be in Western Subgroup A of Eastern European Group. These two countries were in Soviet Union and are currently in CIS which is the successor entity of USSR. Ukraine stopped participating and Moldova announced intention to withdraw but none has withdrawn officially. In CIS enlargement, they will remain in CIS or otherwise be in no Group.

If CIS enlargement is followed, Eastern European countries will remain in EU longer. If the first approach is followed, separation will happen soon. Nevertheless, for an adequate period, there will be two entirely autonomous Groups in Eastern Europe. One will be CIS that already exists. The other will be the countries that will exit EU. In this Group, Eastern European countries that are not EU members will be added gradually.

For some time, matters will remain as they were in EU for the Eastern European countries that will exit. So it will not be much difference between the two approaches. Eastern European countries will not be in EU but it will be like being in EU for some time. Gradually, there will be a smooth transition, from EU to Eastern European Group. Also there will be a smooth transition in the relations with Russia.

In the CIS enlargement, there will be no smooth transition. Eventually, Western European countries will form a separate Group and Eastern European will be left out. Eastern European LEFT OUTS will have to be added in CIS enlargement or otherwise be in no Group. There will be no time for smooth transition. Matters will not remain as they were in EU for some time.

If there is an agreement on separating Western from Eastern countries in EU, matters get in the right direction. There will be no conflict anymore since they will all have agreed. If there is no separation soon, conflict will remain for some time until matters settle in the future. NWO governments in Western and Eastern Europe will insist on EU as it is in NWO's stupid plan, until they are replaced by AntiNWO governments.

It is certain that in the end, Western European countries will form a separate Group. This is not because AntiNWO will impose it. It is the other way around. This is the voters will and AntiNWO takes greatly into consideration what people want. What is the benefit to keep a little longer a situation which is absolutely certain that eventually will end?

It is not only meaningless for NWO governments to insist on a failed plan but it is also harmful for them and overall. By not allowing separation of Western and Eastern European countries in EU, they are empowering Russia. CIS will have and advantage in CIS enlargement process and Russia is the largest and most powerful county in CIS.

Also it is really uncertain if there will be two relatively autonomous Subgroups in Eastern European Group. If there are no Subgroups, Russia's influence will be bigger. Additionally conflict will sustain longer, matters will not settle soon and there will be no smooth transition. Those fools that block separation in EU, should think it over very carefully. By doing so, they are empowering Russia and that is the last thing they want to do.