Deal with countries in EU

EU's trade commissioner went to USA to discuss a trade deal. EU is not a country but a disastrous experiment, a supranational horridness. Some media report that EU offered to USA zero tariffs on cars, pharmaceuticals, rubber, machinery and other industrial goods. NWO media and politicians are promoting zero tariffs between EU and USA, which is free trade.

Free trade is rarely fair. It there are zero tariffs on some products, it is not free trade. Perhaps EU's offer did not decrease deficit or did not do it in a way USA desires. A country should be almost or entirely self-sufficient in certain sectors. If it can't provide enough medicines to its citizens and people are getting very sick or dying, a very serious problem will exist. There are other sectors in which a country should be almost or entirely self-sufficient.

Most important of all, USA should NEVER DEAL with EU. Instead USA should DEAL with COUNTRIES in EU. There are reasons for that. As it was explained in previous articles, trade balances differ in EU countries. With some countries there is a large deficit while wilth other it is small deficit or even a surplus. In addition to that, a very important point in the potential deal will be the rate of surplus reduction, as percentage of a country's GDP.

Deficits can be seen in Column 4, Table A, Appendix 22. Ireland's and Germany's surpluses (deficits for USA) are almost equal, 86,7 and 84,8 billion dollars. As a percentage of their GDP, the difference is very big as it is shown in column 4, Table B. Ireland's is 8,6 times larger. If Germany eliminates surplus in three years, it will have a 0,57% drop in annual growth rates. If Ireland does the same, the drop will be 4,92%.

Italy's trade surplus with USA as percentage of GDP is almost equal with Germany's, 1,78% and 1,72%. But they export different products to USA. Tariffs should be on products, not on countries. Although this indirectly reduces deficits with countries, it is more suitable to markets' behavior and companies' operation. France has 0,50% trade surplus with USA as percentage of GDP.

Different countries need different handling. It is meaningless to have EU officials negotiate a trade agreement with USA. There should be different agreements with different countries. EU is a huge disaster. This is one more example of how chaotic this supranational monstrosity is. NWO monsters experiment and fail tremendously. Then they experiment more and fail even more.

Control of media is part of the conspiracy against European people. Because they control media, they brainwash citizens in EU occupied territory and present their colossal failure as a success. EU is a European dictatorship. NWO is a conspiracy to deceive, brainwash, exploit, rule, suppress mankind. EU is the European part of the conspiracy.

NWO-EU have to end the soonest possible. This is another important reason why USA should not deal with EU but with countries in EU separately. If they deal with EU it will be like dealing with Soviet Union in 1990. USSR was dissolved on December 26th 1991. Actually, it would be worse than that because in the case of Soviet Union there was a successor entity, Commonwealth of Independent States.

In the case of EU there will be no successor entity. EU will break up in two or more parts or entirely be entirely dissolved. In both cases, any AGREEMENTS with EU will be INVALID. Although USA and any country can't impose different tariffs on different EU countries, USA should make agreements with countries. Deficit with EU is just the sum of deficits and surpluses with all EU countries.

Trade war does not start when a country that has deficit imposes tariffs. It starts when the country (or Union in the case of EU) with surplus retaliates. If this does not happen, exports of the country with deficit will remain the same. If we look at table A of Appendix 22, USA exports 370,2 billion dollars and imports 605,08 billion dollars from EU. When USA imposes tariffs, imports will decrease.

If EU does not retaliate, USA's exports will remain at the same level and EU's exports will drop 39%. But this will happen gradually and the time length will be different for each country. For Ireland it will be much longer compared to Germany and Italy. For France it will be much shorter. If EU retaliates, exports to USA will decrease much more than 39% and faster. If it is trade war to the end, EU exports to USA may drop close to 100%.

Of course, EU surplus is the sum of surpluses and deficits EU countries have. Each country should be examined separately. Ireland imports 16,5 billion dollars from USA and exports 103,2 billion. If there is an agreement, exports will drop 84% but this will happen slowly, it may take even fifteen years. It there is a trade war, decrease in exports could reach 100% and it will happen much faster.

Let's look at some more examples. With an agreement, Germany's exports to USA will drop 53%, Italy's 58% and France's 27%. This will happen slowly. In a trade war, drop in exports could reach 100% and it will happen much faster. Drop in exports relates to exports/imports ratio shown in column 4 of Table C. The smaller this ratio, the largest the decrease in exports in order to eliminate deficit.

Italy's prime minister Meloni went to USA. Italy has a trade surplus with USA 1,78% of GDP. Italian Americans are around 6% of USA's population. They are not as many as Mexican and Irish Americans but still a considerable percentage. If with their assistance Meloni can get a five year surplus reduction plan, the annual drop in growth rates will be 0,036% for five years which is insignificant.

If EU countries with a trade surplus have time, they can correct their deficits with other countries and find new markets to make up for the decrease in exports to USA. If companies can find new markets in other countries why haven't they done it already? Often, when in a tough position, people and companies are pushed to do things that they would not do otherwise. Probably there were new markets in other countries but they were not trying hard to find them because they were doing well with what they had.

Even if there is deal with EU, something that should be avoided, EU officials will have to consult with countries. Countries will have to approve the agreement in the EU bodies that take these kind of decisions, Euro Parliament or Councils. It should be done the other way around. USA should agree with countries and then countries could take the decision not to retaliate in EU bodies.