EU worse than communism
EU worse than communism
As it was explained in 'Rapid development', countries have high, average or low (per capita) income because what they do about their economic development is good, average or bad. Eastern Europe's development is not bad but is not good either. It is the third richest Group. All Eastern Europe, except Hellas (Greece) was in Communist Bloc.
Judging by the result, communism's effect was not positive for Eastern Europe's development. Communism failed and Eastern European countries made the huge mistake to get into something that could be even worse. EU is a failed experiment but NWO politicians and media present it as something very positive and deceive people. EU's participation effect on development has been negative for most countries.
They would have more growth, if they were not in EU. Through time, countries in the world improve their economic level. So above zero growth rates is the standard. NWO deceives people because they do not know what their country's average growth rate should be. So they make them believe that they benefit from EU participation while in reality they are harmed because they would have higher average growth rate otherwise.
To find out if a certain EU country was damaged due to EU participation and how much that damage was, we would have to examine it separately. We should follow the process described in 'EU damage calculation'. We need to find out the actual growth rates and the acceptable ones. NWO-EU crooks also use the price level deception to hide the actual growth rates. They present growth in price level as growth in real income.
Eastern European countries lagged in terms of per capita income because of communism. People were in big shock when communism fell. The transition to the market system was difficult and painful. Many countries made the mistake to become EU members. Some of them made an even bigger mistake to join Eurozone. Others that are not members, want to become.
EU is worse than communism! We do not mean that EU is communist. EU's negative effect on development is probably bigger than that of communism. They replaced communism and fell into something much worse. EU is worse than communism regarding the effect it has on the development of certain countries. This will become evident with the case of Hellas (Greece).
Hellas was the only Eastern European country that was not communist. This happened because it has extensive seashore. Britain was a naval power and Soviet Union was not. Churchill was very much interested in Greece but Stalin was not. He cared more for the rest of the Balkans. Besides that, Hellas geographically, historically, racially, culturally, belongs in Eastern Europe.
During communist era, there was a valid argument for not being together with the rest of Eastern Europe. If this happened, Hellas would become communist and the majority of the people did not want it. Hellas gained by not being communist. On the other hand, since it was in the non-communist bloc, it became EU member much sooner than the rest of Eastern European countries and that was very harmful.
Participation in EU is worse than communism. This is evident by the ranking Hellas has in terms of per capita income (purchasing power parity ppp). Czech Republic, Slovenia, Lithuania, Estonia, Poland, Hungary, Latvia, Croatia are in better standing. Some are doing better even than Portugal and Spain. All these are ex-communist countries. The time they had communism was much longer than Greece's membership is in EU.
The first ex-communist countries became members in 2004. The second tier was in 2007 and the third in 2013. Greece has been in EU since 1981, at least twenty three years more than the rest of Eastern European countries. Damage in a country's economy due to participation in EU takes time. It does not show soon but there are signs. It took Hellas almost thirty years in EU to go bankrupt.
After that a big economic crisis followed that lasts till today. Of course, traitors in pro-EU regime are doing very well financially by exploiting the rest. But most people, those that do not belong in pro-EU regime or are not connected with it are struggling. They believe that they are in worse economic situation compared to 1981 when catastrophic EU membership started.
Even if they are not in worse situation, they could have been much better if they did not participate in EU and Eurozone. The country is completely ruined economically but NWO - EU media and politicians, inside and outside the country, present the situation as OK or even positive. Is the case of Greece proof that participation in EU is worse than communism? No but it is a strong indication.
In order to prove it, a lot of work is required that is difficult. Real growth rates should be determined for many communist and non communist countries. This would have to go back a few decades. Data could be hard to find or could be unreliable. If some economists want to attempt it just to prove that participation in EU is worse than communism, they are strongly encouraged. We are not going to try that.
We will leave it as a strong indication. It is quite possible that EU is worse than communism. We need to point out two things. EU is the model NWO plans to use in all three pseudo-continental Unions they want to create, African, American, Asia. Also, EU is not worse than communism for all countries. It is for those that have lower competitiveness. These are generally countries with lower productivity and lower income, Eastern European countries.
Eastern Europeans probably felt that they need Western Europeans to show them what to do in the market system, since they had it while in Eastern Europe there was communism. They do not need Western Europeans to tell them what to do. They should have used some economists who know the market system. Actually Western European politicians do not know what to do either (unless they are economists).
They have economists telling them what to do regarding economic matters. If there were not any economists in Eastern European countries who knew well the market system, they could have paid some from countries that had a market system like USA, Canada, Australia, Japan, S. Korea, Western Europe. These economists would have to be good and pragmatic, understand the real economy.
This is how AntiNWO economists are. Some economists are very good in theories but unable to understand economic reality, how real economy functions. These are NWO economists. Some of them are very respected and have gained even Nobel Prizes. Theory is different than reality. What seems to be correct in theory, could be entirely incorrect in reality because theory is an oversimplification of reality.
Theory could be useful but it should never be confused with reality. In reality there are many factors involved that are not included in theories. The purpose of theory is to make reality understandable. For some economists and other scientists, theory becomes an end in itself. NWO economists failed not because they do not know theory but because they can not understand reality.
Eastern European countries do not need to find good economists anymore because AntiNWO has provided everything for them. AntiNWO developed for Eastern Europe a thirty years economic plan and an organizational model, very different than EU's. These will bring rapid development and make them reach Western Europe's economic level. Actually these will be used in all other groups. Several modifications will be required to adjust for the specific conditions found in each Group.
Convergence deception Advantage deception More deception Price level consequences Economic success Quadrillions damage by EU Real convergence Two convergences Systems deception