Example of Plan B

In AntiNWO's magnificent Plan B, there are endless ways to form Groups and the four Coalitions. We will give one example that covers America, Europe, Central Asia, Western Asia and North Africa. This is only an example, not the way AntiNWO proposes to form Groups. All Groups are between three and four hundred million (300-400 mil) in population. This is not necessary to happen but an upper and a lower limit in a Group's population should be agreed.

In Plan A, Mexico was placed with USA - Canada. This was a weak point in the plan because there is clearly lack of homegeneity. Nevertheless, this weakness was much more manageable, compared to the disastrous NWO's plan that has all countries of the American continent in one Union. In this example, USA and Canada will be in Group 1 and have very close relations.

Trump wants USA and Canada to be one country, something that they reject in Canada. The next closest think to being one country is to be one Group with very close relations. According to our data, the Group will have a population of three hundred and seventy five million (375,36 mil) as presented in Appendix 18. There may be small differences with most recent data.

Next Group 2 starts with Mexico. It includes all Central America, all countries in the Caribbean Sea and some countries in the northern part of South America. It has a total population of three hundred and thirteen million (313,45 mil). Group 3 includes all the other countries in South America and has three hundred twenty six million population (326,16 mil).

In Europe, there are two Groups that will include only European countries. The only exceptions are two small countries next to Europe - Asia borders, Georgia and Armenia. They are Christian while the countries that follow in Asia are Muslim. First European Group 4 is Celtic and Germanic. They get as extra bonus Austria and Finland which are not Celtic or Germanic countries but racially closer to Eastern Europe.

Italy is not Celtic or Germanic but the only Latin country in Europe and the world. For population evenness, it is placed with the rest of the European countries in Group 5. The population in Group 4 is three hundred and sixty million (360,05 mil) and in Group 5 three hundred and ninety three million (392,63 mil). If Italy was placed in Group 4, it would have four hundred and nineteen million (418,84 mil) and Group 5 three hundred and thirty four million (333,84 mil).

If we want to have the two Groups more even in terms of population, countries with roughly fifteen million in population would have to move from Group 5 to Group 4. For instance, if Czechia and Slovakia are placed in Group 4 instead of Group 5, the first Group has three hundred seventy six million (376,31 mil) and the second also three hundred and seventy six million (376,38 mil).

Another alternative is to place Italy in Group 4 and Austria - Finland which are racially closer to Eastern Europe in Group 5. Group 4 will have four hundred and four million (404,18 million) and Group 5 three hundred and forty nine million (348,51 mil). In this case, Group 4 will be the only one slightly above four hundred million (400 mil) while the rest will be in the three to four hundred million range (300-400 mil).

Turkiye and Iran should like Group 6. Much of Turkiye's area of interest is in it, although not all. Three Arab countries are included, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon. Shia Muslims are majority in Iran, Iraq and Azerbaijan. Large percentages are also in Lebanon. The total population of Group 6 is three hundred and seventy two million (372,27 mil). The rest of the Arab countries are in Group 7 and the population is three hundred and eighty eight million (388,57 mil),

Again, this is only an example. There are endless alternatives on the way Groups and Coalitions can be formed. It is important though that the Groups fit in four Coalitions with roughly equal population. Do the Groups that we present as an example fit in four Coalitions with equal size? We do not know because we do not know how the rest of the Groups will be.

There could also be Subgroups in the Groups presented. We show as examples in Appendix 20 the two European Groups but most of the Groups can also be divided in Subgroups. The only Group that can not have Subgroups is Group 1, USA - Canada because it has only two countries. Group 4 is divided broadly in Celtic and Germanic Subgroup but not precisely.

In order to have the two Subgroups more even in terms of population, some Celtic countries were added to Germanic Subgroup in Table A. Still, Celtic Subgroup 4A has one hundred ninety four million (194,34 mil) and Germanic + Subgroup 4B one hundred and sixty six million (165,71 mil). If Belgium and Luxemburg are in Subgroup 4A, the population becomes two hundred and six million (206,75 mil) while Subgroup 4B will have one hundred and fifty three million (153,30 mil).

Group 5 is also divided in two Subgroups. In Table A, Subgroup 5A has one hundred and eighty nine million (189,16 mil) and Subgroup 5B two hundred and three million (203,47 mil). This is only an example of how Groups could be divided in Subgroups. The level of autonomy Subgroups will have will be decided after the Groups and Subgroups are formed.

The Subgroups presented could also be Groups, if they are within the population range that will be agreed. The four Subgroups are in the range of one hundred and sixty to two hundred and ten million (160 - 210 mil). Israel is not included in this example. It could be placed in Groups 4 or 5. Also it could be in USA's Coalition without being in any Group.

This was only an example to give an idea on how Groups and Subgroups could be formed in AntiNWO's magnificent Plan B. On the other hand, if the involved parties like it, they can use it. It is a reasonable way but there are many more other reasonable ways. PLAN B's FLUIDITY can OVERCOME all OBSTACLES. In the end, it may be the one that will be implemented.