Fundamentally wrong fundamentals

EU is something horrible and harmful that is presented as wonderful and beneficial. EU does not concern only Western and Eastern Europe but the whole world because it is NWO's cornerstone, the experiment of the organizational and economic model that will be used in the other three Unions, African, Asian, American. Not only Western and Eastern Europeans but people all over the world should hate EU.

ALL EU's FUNDAMENTALS are FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG. EU's fundamentals are common policies, common market, common currency. Common policies are closely related to taking powers from nations and giving them to the supranational monstrosity, EU. The more powers EU has, the more common policies will be. Common policies are fundamentally wrong, a truly lose - lose situation.

No specialized knowledge is required for someone to understand this. Suppose that there are five sizes for t-shirts; extra small, small, medium, large, extra large. Instead of having five sizes available, there is only one size that fits all. For some people this one size fits all will be small or very small while for others it will be large or very large. It will not be suitable for most of the people, if not for all.

Each country has different conditions, different problems, different electorate. Different policies are required for each country. Common policies are unsuitable for all countries. Having common policies is harmfull for all countries. So why is it presented as beneficial? Because it serves NWO's main goal which is global government with four Unions as administrative divisions. Decisions made by global government will be implemented by the four Unions.

Common market is very closely related to free movement of products, services, people, capital. Free movement of people makes common the job market while free movement of capital makes common the financial market. Free movement of products and services is free trade. FREE TRADE is a BIG HOAX. It is presented by NWO propaganda as a win - win situation while in reality it is a win - lose situation.

Participating in a FREE TRADE zone can be an ECONOMIC DISASTER for some countries. With free trade, those countries that have lower competitiveness are harmed while those that have higher competitiveness benefit. There are two factors that determine competitiveness; a) productivity b) price level. Generally, countries with higher per capita income have higher productivity.

Generally, countries with lower per capita income have lower productivity and are harmed. But it is possible for a country with lower productivity to benefit from free trade, if the price level is low enough. In that case, it can have higher competitiveness, eventhough it has lower productivity. This is the general idea but productivity, price level, competitiveness have to be examined sector by sector.

If countries with lower competitiveness are trapped in a free trade zone, their GDP is reduced and so is GDP per capita and people become poorer. In GDP we should also calculate an acceptable growth rate for the country's economic level. Generally, growth rate is inverse of per capita income. The lower per capita income is, the higher growth rate should be.

It is possible that countries are harmed by EU participation and still have growth. This growth is much lower than what it would be otherwise. For instance, a country could have 4% growth rate if it was not in EU but due to EU participation it is only 1%. So pro-EU crooks deceive citizens presenting participation as beneficial because there is growth while in reality it is extremly harmful because growth is much lower than what it should be.

Common currency has two aspects. One aspect is a lose - lose situation and the other a win - lose situation. All countries are harmed very much because they give away very important tools of monetary policy that can be very useful. Regarding the effect of common currency on price level, some countries are harmed while others benefit. Euro's exchange rate can be conceptually viewed as the weighted average of the exchange rates replaced currencies had.

If there are no other factors, prices should fall in countries where these were higher compared to the rest and rise in countries where they were lower before adopting common currency. Price level increase reduces competitiveness while price level decrease increases competitiveness. From common currency, countries with higher price level benefit while countries with lower price level are harmed.

With common market, countries will lower competitiveness are harmed relatively to the rest of the countries in the free trade zone. With common currency, countries with lower prices are harmed relatively to all the countries in the world. In that sense, although both common market and common currency can be very harmful for certain countries, common currency may be considered much worse.

As it has been explained, controlled legal migration can fill job vacancies, without having the very many problems that free movement of people creates. All EU's fundamentals are fundamentally wrong. EU's FUNDAMENTALS are NWO's FUNDAMENTALS. NWO's plan and EU are creations of very ignorant or extremely evil people. Everyday that NWO's plan and EU proceed, a LOT of DAMAGE is done to a LOT of PEOPLE.

Economic cooperation can be win - win situation and does not require free trade. As a matter of fact, generally free trade is very harmful for countries with lower competitiveness while countries with higher competiveness benefit. AntiNWO's economic and organizational model for Groups is much different than NWO's (EU's) model and a truly win-win situation. Nevertheless, it is optional. 

Groups can choose any model they like. But which Group would want to adopt a highly defective model like EU's? According to AntiNWO's Plan A, EU will be replaced with Western and Eastern European Group. Eastern European Group will implement AntiNWO's model for Groups. In Western European Group, they can adopt elements or all of AntiNWO's superb model.

But only separation of Western from Eastern Europe will significally decrease problems. Disparity in per capita income, productivity and competetiveness will decrease. Furthermore, with Eastern euro, competitiveness of those Eastern European countries currently in Eurozone that will choose to keep common currency will increase a lot. Additionally, there will be many changes in the organizational and economic model in both Groups.

MOST of NWO-EU CLAIMS are FALSE. NWO-EU fundamentals are presented as win-win, while in reality they are win-lose or lose-lose. They only serve NWO's plan for Global Goverment. Do NOT TRUST NWO and do NOT BELIEVE NWO PROPAGANDA. Check very carefully all their claims and you will realize that most of them are false. What you may think that benefits you, is probably harming you a lot.

EU is a horrible monstrostiy and must end one way or the other. This is one of AntiNWO's main goals. In AntiNWO's Plan A and Plan B, there are Groups but there is no EU. In Plan A, there is Western and Eastern European Group (Union, Community, Commonwealth etc). In AntiNWO's Plan C, there are no Groups. If AntiNWO's decision makers can't agree on Plan A or Plan B soon, they must proceed with Plan C. EU and all Groups must be dissolved.