Game is over!

If we had only two choices, a) the previous system b) ultra - globalization, we would definitely prefer the first. We support an alternative nice and easy mild globalization and we hope that there is a third alternative. We believe that a minimum globalization is inevitable in order to avoid ultra-globalization. Perhaps an alternative globalization will emerge from the Western Center Right Parties' Summit.

During World War II, there was a long time period where it was obvious that Hitler will win. Then in a relatively short time, some months, this changed. It seemed that he would lose the War and it actually happened. Hitler wanted to establish a Global Socialist Dictatorship, like ultra-globalists want to do today. Until not long ago, it seemed that they were winning. Now it is obvious that the game is over. Let’s say we are watching a soccer game. There are 20 minutes left and the score is 4-0. Most likely the winner will not change. The referee has not blown the whistle yet signaling the end of the match but it is very unlikely that the winner will change.

It is not only Trump that is against ultra - globalization. Other leaders like Johnson, Scheer (Canada), Morrison (Australia), Collins (New Zealand), Salvini (Italy), Le Pen (France), Bolsonaro (Brazil), Putin (Russia), Erdogan (Turkey) etc are against as well. Now, all these do not hold the same views in political matters but do have things in common regarding globalization. Ultra - globalists call them nationalists, isolationists, racists, facists and other names. We call them patriots. They want to keep their independence and their cultural identity. 

United Kingdom is already outside evil, socialist, European Union. Le Pen’s was the first party of center right in recent elections and according to recent polls the first party overall. Salvini’s Center Right Coalition won recent elections. The four largest economies in Europe are Germany, UK, France and Italy. They take part in G7 and G8. Out of the four, only Germany’s first center right party supports ultra-globalization. Also in Australia, New Zealand and Canada, the first center-right parties have anti - ultra - globalization stance.

There are other important countries in the world where patriots are winning in center right. Examples are Japan, Brazil, Russia, India. Japan is the third economic power, after USA and China. Brazil, Russia and India are very large countries. India is second or first in the World, in terms of population. Russia is second or third in terms of military power after USA and (before;) China. Turkey and Israel are two more examples. They have lesser importance. Turkey has the second largest army in NATO.

Israel has the support of Global Judaism although their interests (Israel’s and Global Judaism’s) are not aligned. It is a somewhat complicated. US Jews supported Biden while Netanyahu seems to be on Trump’s side. Most of the World’s Jews live in Israel (40%) and in USA (40%). American Jews are mostly center left ultra - globalists and supported Biden. They have been for decades in alliance with African Americans, Chinese Americans, LGBT, Germany, China etc. They do care for Israel but they care for their interests more.

It is Trump’s choice how to assemble the Western Center & Right Parties’ Summit because he has an assignment from God. Crypto - socialist parties and politicians like CDU and Merkel could be excluded. China is de facto excluded. Even if crypto - socialists like Merkel and CDU take place, ultra - globalists will be a small minority. So, the political stance against ultra-globalization will prevail in center right.

The situation is like being in a soccer match, at 70’ with a score 4-0. Game has not ended yet but it is extremely unlikely that the winner will change. Patriots will prevail in center right. On the other hand, most likely ultra - globalists will prevail in the center left, although many in center left and left are against ultra - globalization. Then there will be a second match between center left and center right that may or may not end in a tie - mutual compromise. The other alternative to compromise is “the winner takes it all”.