Get the best deal

NWO fanatic Starmer initiated a meeting in London for Ukraine. This was a desperate effort to sustain a dead plan. Most of those that attended were also NWO fanatics. NWO placed Zelensky as President of Ukraine and caused the war. This is because according to ridiculous NWO's plan, all Eastern Europe should be in EU and NATO, except Russia. Belarus is not excluded but remains an ally of Russia. Russia, Belarus and Ukraine have always been very close allies.

In order for their insane plan to proceed, Ukraine would have to be pulled away from Russia. That is why they orchestrated the pseudo - revolution and the coup d' etat against a legally elected President who was friendly towards Russia, as most Ukrainians had always been. They also placed Zelensky's government who are NWO's puppets. Their mission was to lead Ukraine away from Russia and towards Celtic and Germanic countries and EU.

The reason of the war in Ukraine is NWO's absurd plan which is extremely problematic and harmful. Starmer and other NWO fanatics are obsessively stuck to that madness. They can see nothing else but the advancement of their plan which is one of the greatest human stupidities. They do not work for the interests of their voters but only for the success of a silly, childish, failed plan. Well, their stupid plan is dead, obsolete, thrown in the trash.

There is no way this madness will proceed. But their obsessive persistence to that huge failure harms a lot their countries and the world. These people are major global threats and the voters in their countries should kick them out. There should be others in power who instead of being stuck to an extremely malfunctioning plan that has failed tremendously, they would try to get the best deal for their countries.

Currently, there are many possibilities with AntiNWO's magnificent Plan B. In Europe, we have examined; a) "clean" two parts division b) extended two parts division c) three parts division d) four parts division. Also in the two parts division, there are a few alternatives regarding Subgroups, which may be a very useful feature, especially if they have relative autonomy.

In the "clean" two parts division, only European countries are included in eastern European Group, as shown in "Example of Plan B" and Appendix 18. The only exceptions are Georgia and Armenia. A few more alternatives are examined in "Plan B is a process". In Appendix 20, two Subgroups are shown for each Group of Appendix 18. We can't know how they think in each country but present what seems reasonable.

Both Subgroups seem to be good alternatives for Italy. In the option of Table A, they are together with Greco - Thraco - Illyrian  countries and German Wannabes (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries). In the option of Table B, they are separately from Orthodox countries but together with Ukraine. They would have to decide if they want Ukraine in their Subgroup or not. Both options have advantages and disadvantages.

Italy's prime minister Meloni is not fully aligned with NWO fanatics. Italy's governing coalition is eurosceptic. Nevertheless, it is not clear if they are aligned with AntiNWO's magnificent plan. Both options are a tremendous opportunity for Italy. They will make a clean start, solve their economic problems and have high growth rates. In addition, they will play an important role in Subgroup A and Eastern Mediterranean.

Most importantly, they will be Brussels free. They will have more autonomy and national sovereignty due to AntiNWO's superb organizational and economic Group model. Only the minimum requirements for the Groups' functionality will be decided at supranational level. Russia will definitely be in a different Subgroup. So if the Subgroups are relatively autonomous, they will not have so close relations with Russia.

Both options also have advantages and disadvantages for France. The first option of Table A, is roughly a west - east division. They will have to deal with fewer countries in their Subgroup. All of them will be Celtic. The option of Table B is roughly a north - south division and seems better for them. A larger part of Europe will be in their Subgroup. They could establish close relations with more countries than in the option of Table A.

Instead of Macron being obsessively stuck to NWO's absurd, failed and dead plan, he should strive to get the best deal for France. We can't know how they think but the option of Table B seems a good deal for France. Since Macron has a sick obsession with an absurd, failed and dead plan, others should govern France that would strive to get the best deal for their country.

There are more options. In the extended two part division, the western European Group can be a little larger. If Italy wants to be in the same Group with Celtic and Germanic countries, they should support the extended version of the two part division. This is not logical but they may want to make an emotional decision, for their own reasons. Alternatively, German Wannabes could be in western European Group.

Germany would have Lebensraum. France is also in the Weimar Triangle with Poland and they may support that. For German Wannabes to be together with Celtic and Germanic countries, Italy must decide to be in eastern European Group. Otherwise, German Wannabes will participate because they are Eastern European and Slavic countries. So Germany and France would have to convince Italy by giving them some rewards.

In the tree part division, Italy and German Wannabes can be together with Celtic and Germanic countries but there would be two Groups instead of one. The third European Group is comprised of Orhodox countries. So in the "clean" version, Italy and German Wannabes are separately from Celtic and Germanic countries. In the extended two parts division, either Italy or German Wannabes are together with Celtic and Germanic countries.

In the three parts division, Italy and German Wannabes are together with Celtic and Germanic countries, in two Groups. Also some Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries are with them, Hungary, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia. The problem is Canada. If the population range is two to three hundred million (200 - 300 mln), USA will not be in a Group and neither will Canada. There can be a larger range though or Canada could end up being an exception like Israel.

All these are details. The point is that most of the "leaders" that Starmer gathered in London are in the wrong direction, supporting an absurd and failed plan that has become obsolete. They are causing big problems to the world and their countries. Instead of trying to get the best deal for their countries, they persist with sick obsession in something that will not go on.