Important 4A Subgroup 1
Important 4A Subgroup 1
Subgroup A of Group 4 is important because most likely Ukraine and Israel will be in it. Currently, there are wars in both countries. In Israel there is a temporary ceasefire and hopefully it will be permanent. But the situation still remains dangerous and the war wounds will have to be healed. We should take a better look at important Subgroup A of Group 4.
For Ukraine, it is certain that it will participate in Group 4. Because relations with Russia have deteriorated, Ukraine will be in Subgroup 4A and Russia in 4B, CIS (Commonwealth of Independent Countries). Most likely Israel will be in Subgroup 4A as well. Trump will have to convince Russia, not to oppose it and give something in return. Russia will not be in the same Subgroup but it will be in the same Group.
Israel is a Middle Eastern country. AntiNWO included Israel in Group 4 to separate it from Arabs. AntiNWO is following "out of sight out of mind" approach. Nevertheless, because it is not an Eastern European country, it must be accepted by the rest of the countries in the Group. Ukraine is certain to be in Group 4. It is an Eastern European country that originates from Kievan Russes.
There are three possibilities regarding Israel's (or any country's) acceptance in a Subgroup. One is to have only the countries in the Subgroup decide. Another is to have all the countries in the Group decide. Countries could have equal weight in their decision or countries in the Subgroup can have more weight. So there are two possibilities and the second one has two options. If there is weighted decision making, there are endless alternatives regarding the weights assigned.
The third option makes more sense. The rest of the countries in the Group should also decide because a country will not be only in the Subgroup but also in the Group. The countries in the same Subgroup should have more weight. If only the countries in the Subgroup decide, Russia will not get involved. Otherwise, it would be difficult for Israel to participate, if Russia opposes it, unless Subgroup B carries small weight in the decision.
Although it is certain that Ukraine will participate in Group 4, this may not happen from the start. The countries that will not participate from the beginning will have to be accepted later by the existing members. So it is not only Israel that will have to be accepted but many countries. The difference is that Eastern European countries are certain to participate somehow eventually.
For Israel it is not certain but it seems very likely because it is the best placement it can get. Countries could be accepted as trading partners or members. They could remain as trading partners for long time or even for ever. Also the opposite is possible. Members could become trading partners. We should explain how the process would be because there have been some changes.
In Subgroup 4A there are some countries certain to participate. These are Balkan countries, Hungary, Slovakia, Ukraine. Moldova is a Balkan country. To these either German Wannabes or Italy will be added. German Wannabes are Poland, Czechia and Baltic countries. The latter are Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia. Certain countries are in three categories; a) in EU and Eurozone b) in EU but not in Eurozone c) not in EU.
Starting from north, Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, Slovenia, Croatia, Bulgaria, Hellas (Greece), Cyprus are in EU. Slovakia, Croatia, Slovenia, Hellas, Cyprus are also in Eurozone. Ukraine, Moldova, Bosnia, Serbia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Albania are not in EU. Among the not certain, only Israel in not in EU. Italy and German Wannabes are. Poland and Czechia are not in Eurozone while the rest are.
The countries that are in EU should spin off. Ideally, there would be a one step exit. Certain countries should exit concurrently with Italy or German Wannabes. If Italy or German Wannabes do not pledge to join Group 4 soon, there will be a two steps exit. First, the certain countries will exit and at a second stage, Italy or German Wannabes.
For the countries that will exit, matters will remain as they were in EU for a transitional period. Gradually they should prepare to merge with CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States) countries and adopt AntiNWO's economic plan and organizational model. Also the countries that are not EU members will gradually be added to Subgroup 4A. Starting countries will be those that will exit EU.
The rest will be added by existing members. Although certain countries that are not in EU will eventually participate, members will decide when these will join and how they will be accepted. It is possible to start as trading partners. Most likely, Serbia and Montenegro will be accepted soon as members. This is a decision members will make and we can not predict with certainty what they will decide in the future.
If a country is accepted as a member, it becomes part of the organizational and economic plan. It also participates in all decisions regarding Subgroup and Group matters. Trading partners only have preferential trading relations. They are not included in the organizational and economic plan and do not participate in decision making. There could be some extended meetings where trading partners participate as well.
It is possible to add countries in Subgroup 4A before it merges with Subgroup 4B, CIS. In that case, Subgroup 4B countries will not participate in this decision. The same could be done in Subgroup 4B. Countries could be added before it merges with Subgroup 4A. There are not many countries not in CIS though, just Georgia. Ukraine and Moldova are still in CIS but Ukraine is not participating and Moldova has announced that it will withdraw. These will be in Subgroup 4A.
It is possible for Israel to be accepted in Subgroup 4A at this stage, before it merges with Subgroup 4B. If Italy or German Wannabes have not pledged to join yet, they will not participate in this decision. Only existing members at the time of the decision will. Although in that case formally Russia will not be part of the decision, it is much better if there is an unofficial agreement with Russia.
Actually this may work out well for Russia too. It has good relations with Iran and Turkiye which have bad relations with Israel. So if Russia officially agrees to accept Israel in Group 4, Iran and Turkiye may not like it, although they should. In this way, Israel gets out of their way and vice versa. Nevertheless, if Israel is accepted in Subgroup 4A before it merges with Subgroup 4B - CIS, it could help Russia to save face, not look bad to Iran, Turkiye and some other countries.
Italy’s rational decision Benefits with Italy Style is needed German Wannabes’ choice