Important 4A Subgroup 3
Important 4A Subgroup 3
Eurozone countries that will exit will form Eastern Eurozone or Eastern-Southern if Italy participates. It is possible to have different currencies in Subgroups, not only in Group 4 but also in Group 3 and in any Group. Eastern (or eastern-southern) euro will start with 1:1 exchange rate to western (or western-northern) euro. It is expected to fall and this will boost the competitiveness of products and services.
Also, joining Eastern (or Eastern-Southern) Eurozone will be easier for the rest of the countries. Currently, the Eastern European countries that are not in Eurozone are the wise ones, although the opposite is presented by NWO-EU propaganda. If they join Eurozone, their competitiveness will decrease and that will make them poorer. GDP per capita will decrease or not increase as it would otherwise with their national currency.
Most likely, joining Eastern (or Eastern-Southern) Eurozone will not harm their competitiveness. Of course they should examine this very carefully because decrease in competitiveness is not the only problem with common currency. Additionally, countries can't have monetary policy anymore, which is a very useful tool. If Greece (Hellas) had its own currency, the crisis would have been milder. If it was not in EU, there would be no crisis.
There are some advantages from common currency but there are also many disadvantages. NWO-EU propaganda presents that common currency is something very good. This is another big deception. Each country must examine very carefully, if they benefit from common currency. Eastern (or Eastern-Southern) Eurozone will make it easier for countries that join to benefit but this (benefit) is not certain.
Another option would be national common currency. This is national currency alligned to a another currency that is used in international transactions. That currency could be dollar, euro or something else. An adjustment to all prices will be required. This happens too when countries join euro. The exchange rate of the national currency to dollar, euro (or something else) would become 1:1. Of course it will not remain at that but will fluctuate.
In Subgroup 4A, there could be Regions but it is not necessary. If there are Regions, they can have capitals. If there are no capitals for Regions, they should be at least for the Subgroups. If Italy participates, Belgrade is close to the center of the Subgroup. If German Wannabes participate, Budapest is more suitable. If it is necessary, there could be a capital for the Group as well but this is a decision to be made in the future.
If German Wannabes or Italy exit later from EU, they will not be able to participate in the first important decisions that will shape Subgroup 4A and Group 4. It is better for all countries, if this matter is settled the soonest possible. It is better for Group 4 and Group 3. The composition of the two Subgroups in both Groups will be different if German Wannabes or Italy participate.
If Italy is in Group 4, it will be together with Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries in the Greco-Roman Subgroup 4A. Group 4 will have a Greco-Roman and a CIS Subgroup. German Wannabes will be in the "Germanic" (loose definition) Subgroup. UK and Ireland will be in the Celtic Subgroup. So Group 3 will have a Celtic and a Germanic Subgroup.
If Italy is in Group 3, most likely it will be together with Latin speaking countries that erroneously are considered Latin. UK and Ireland will be in the Germanic Subgroup 3B. German Wannabes will be with Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries in Subgroup 4A. If Italy does not pledge to join Group 4, German Wannabes must participate since they are Eastern European and Slavic countries.
There is a big difference between Italy and German Wannabes. If Italy does not pledge participation in Group 4, it will be in Group 3 and German Wannabes will be in Group 4. Theoretically, they have till 2055 to decide. German Wannabes should decide very soon what they want to do. There have two choices; a) be in Group 3 b) be in Group 4.
If they want to be in Group 3, they should make some serious conversations with Italy. They should try to convince them to participate in Group 4 because this is the only way German Wannabes will be in Group 3. It Italy does not pledge to join Group 4, German Wannabes will certainly be in it because they are Eastern European and Slavic countries.
They could get the assistance from other countries as well. Some examples are Germany and UK. May be Germans prefer the third alternative, German Wannabes in their "Germanic" Subgroup. May be UK prefers it too. If Italy is in Group 3, most likely UK and Ireland will be in Subgroup 3B with "Germanic" countries. Perhaps they prefer to be with Celtic countries and that can happen if Italy is in Group 4.
It should not be very hard to convince Italy because they would benefit enormously if they participate in Group 4. If they do not succeed in that, German Wannabes should spin off from EU together with the rest or Eastern European countries, even if they may prefer to be in Group 3 together with Celtic and "Germanic countries. There is a very important reason.
The countries that will spin off will take some very important decisions that will shape Subgroup 4A and Group 4. If Italians have no intention to pledge participation in Group 4, inevitably German Wannabes will participate later. But it would be too late because all the important decisions would have already been made and German Wannabes will have to accept what other countries have decided.
Obviously, if their decision is to participate in Group 4, they should do it the soonest possible, in the case Italians do it first. It is "first come will be served and the other party will be left out'. There is urgency for German Wannabes to find out what they want. If they want to participate in Group 3, they should convince Italians to be in Group 4. If they are not successful in doing that, they should spin off from EU with the rest of the countries.
Suppose that Italy or German Wannabes do not pledge to join Group 4 soon. There will be future governments that will do it. But for German Wannabes, the risk is bigger. Let's take the case that has very few chances of happening. Let's assume that no side pledges to join Group 4 till 2055. Then, German Wannabes will have to exit Western European Group and join Eastern European Group.
That will be a problem for both Groups and a very difficult situation for German Wannabes. Not only they will have to comply to what others have decided but adjustment would be hard after so many years. The two groups would have taken different directions. It would be much better if they make a clean start with the rest of the countries that will exit EU.
The same is true for Italy, if they join Group 4 much later. So although theoretically time limit is 2055, this matter should settle soon, one way ore the other. A decision should be made soon. Either Italy or German Wannabes must decide soon to participate in Group 4. Of course, it it doesn't happen soon, it may happen later but things will be more difficult for both groups and mainly the side that will exit late.
Price level consequences Price level consequences Growth rates deception