Need and ways to control

Western European NWO is a major global problem. They are the main obstacle in the implementaion of AntiNWO's spectacular plan. But this is not all. They are the main supporters of NWO's catastrophic plan. It is absolutely necessary to end that madness. In order to do that, the main supporters, Western European NWO, must no longer be in power. NWO governments in Western Europe must be replaced with AntiNWO the soonest possible.

This is common belief in all AntiNWO. But opinions differ on how this major problem, Western European NWO, will be confronted. Some people in AntiNWO, a small minority, believe that Western European voters will kick out NWO governments, without any assistance. After all, the citizens of Western Europe prefer AntiNWO's plan. They want to be in a separate Group without Eastern European countries.

The majority of AntiNWO disagrees with the belief that Western European voters will be able to get rid of NWO governments without any help. They find this opinion extremely optimistic or even naive. NWO conspiracy has been going on in Western Europe for centuries. It has very deep roots. Western Europe is the most contaminated place on earth with NWO virus and a threat to the world. 

The majority in AntiNWO believes that Westen European voters will need some assistance to kick out NWO governments. Eventhough the majority agrees that assistance is absolutely necessary, there are different opinions on how this can be done. One way is to assist AntiNWO parties. This is NWO common practice and has been going on for very long time.

Whenever there are elections in a country, they help their own to win the elections in various ways. This will be explained better in other articles about Part B of NWO's plan. Still, many people in AntiNWO feel that this would not be enough. In order to be certain that NWO governments will be replaced with AntiNWO and NWO will be eliminated, some control must be exerted over Western Europe.

A possible way to exert control over Western Europe was explained in previous article. In feasible combination, the Coalition of North America - South and Central America - Eastern Europe - Arab countries encircles geographically Western Europe. Also it contains a large part of oil and gas reserves. It is obvious that the Coalition will have some control over Westen Europe.

This also fits well with the availability reasoning for forming Coalitions which (feasible combination) currently has a comfortable lead. Nevertheless, there are some different opinions. The goal is to have some control over Western Europe in order to assist voters to kick out NWO governments. Some people in AntiNWO believe that it can be accomplished in ways different than the feasible combination.

USA and China are currently the two largest economies. In terms of military power, they are in first and third place. Russia is in second. One of the two, USA or China, might be able to have some control over Western Europe, if they are placed together. In the case of USA, Western Europe will be in the same Subcoalition. In the case of China, it will be in the same Coalition because China's and India's Coalitions have only two Groups.

While it is really obvious how the Coalition of North America - South and Central America - Eastern Europe - Arab countries will be able to exert some control over Western Europe, it is not that obvious how USA or China will be able to do it, if they are placed together. The supporters of this opinion have not been able to provide some convincing reasoning so far. Nevertheless, they may do that in the future.

Some people in AntiNWO support a combination of the two ways mentioned to control Western Europe. Suppose that North America, South and Central America, Eastern Europe, Arab countries are among AntiNWO's active supporters. They will make the decision and choose one of the combinations for Coalitions that will last for centuries. It is possible that they do not want to be in the same Coalition.

Perhaps, they prefer a combination other than the feasible. They could still cooperate and exert control over Western Europe, without forming a Coalition. They will place Western Europe in a Coalition, according to the combination they will choose. So they could place Western Europe with USA or China, if this is chosen to further increase control over Western Europe, assuming that convincing support is provided.

The availability reasoning is very logical. That is why currently feasible combination has a comfortable lead. But it is not necessary to follow it. First, decision makers have to decide what they want. Suppose that for their own reasons they want compromising combination, a North America - South and Central America - Western Europe - Eastern Europe Coalition.

In that case, the Coalition will be for some time incomplete, without Western Europe, since it opposes AntiNWO's superb plan. The Coalition could remain incomplete for long time, even decades. An important factor is the length of time that the Coalition will stay incomplete. Will it be a few years or many decades? Obviously, the first is much more manageable.

If waiting time is estimated to be many decades, decision makers may choose feasible combination, form a complete Coalition and place Western Europe in a Pseudo-coalition. Perhaps, the decision makers may believe that by exerting control over Western Europe, NWO governments can be replaced with AntiNWO relatively soon. In that case, they may choose compromising combination, if that is what they want.

Western Europe will be in the same Coalition with North America, South and Central America, Eastern Europe. The other three Groups of the Coalition could cooperate and exert some control over Western Europe until NWO is entirely eliminated. In compromising combination, one Subcoalition is Western Europe - Eastern Europe and the other North America - South and Central America.

If control of Western Europe is a goal and assuming that convincing support is provided, it may be better to have one Subcoalition North America - Western Europe and the other Eastern Europe - South and Central America. Instead of South and Central America, Arab Group could participate in the Coalition. In that case, there will be geographical proximity in Eastern Europe - Arab Group Subcoalition.

It is extremely crucial to replace NWO governments with AntiNWO in Western Europe and gradually eliminate NWO. Most people in AntiNWO feel that this can only be accomplished by exerting some control over Western Europe. In the decision AntiNWO's active supporters will make regarding Coalitions, the ways to control Western Europe should be taken into consideration.

Currently, feasible combination has a comfortable lead. But the "tournament" is not over yet. Although feasible combination has more chances to win, another combination could finish first. We do not know with certainty what AntiNWO's active supporters will decide. What we know for sure is that Western Europe and the other opponents of AntiNWO's spectacular plan will not participate in the decision making.