Number and size of Groups

There are only two global full packages, NWO's and AntiNWO's. These have considerable differences at least in; a) grouping b) power of supranational entities c) type and authority of global body d) organizational and economic model for Groups e) Group relations. Ideology can also be considered a difference because NWO's model comes with a specific ideology while AntiNWO's leaves ideological differences to be settled in national elections.

The two groupings are very different. There is difference in the number of Groups and the size of Groups. NWO's package has four psedo-continental Unions, European, American, African, Asian. They have huge differences in their populations. Asian Union has seven times more population than European. The other two, American and African, are in between the smallest (European) and the largest (Asian).

NWO's grouping evolved in a really thoughtless, random and ridiculous way. During the Crusades, participating Western European countries thought that they could have some type of cooperation during peace time, in areas other than military, like economic. That is how the idea of Western European Union first started. We should point out that in AntiNWO's grouping, there is Western European Group, the ORIGINAL IDEA during the Crusades.

Later, Western European countries thought that it would be better to conquer Eastern Europe and have European Union instead of just Western European. That is why Crusaders sacked Constantinople and undertook Northern Crusades. Although Eastern Europeans kicked them out of their land, the idea of European Union remained in Western Europe. At some time, Western European countries thought that they could extent their potential Union to the rest of the world with three more pseudo-continental Unions (American, Asian, African) under a global government.

NWO and their predecessors never bothered to examine the populations and the homogeneity of their Groups (Unions). They never bothered to examine if their extremely malfunctional grouping separates countries that should be together like for instance Arab and Eastern European countries. NWO's is a thoughtless, frivolous, ridiculous grouping and anyone one who supports it a very silly person. On the other hand, AntiNWO's grouping is very well thought through.

NWO's Groups are very large. EU is the smallest Group in NWO's plan and still not complete. More countries would be added according to their foolish plan. EU is already a total chaos, extremely dysfunctional. The other three Unions, in NWO's insane plan are much larger and much more heterogeneous than EU. It will be chaos of astronomical proportions. AntiNWO's Groups are much smaller, equal in size and more homogeneous. The smaller in terms of population and the more homogeneous the Groups are , the better these can function.

Supposedly, NWO's mad men and women advocate closer international relations. But their grouping does the opposite. Their thinking is full of contradictions because they are thoughtless, silly people. They have caused an awful lot of damage all around the world and especially in Europe. NWO's incohesive madness has to end and only AntiNWO can stop it. Their Groups are so big that they will be relatively self sufficient. There will be mostly internal relations inside the Groups.

External relations between Groups will be limited. The SMALLER the GROUPS are, the CLOSER RELATIONS between Groups can be. Because AntiNWO's Groups are smaller, not only they can function better but they can have closer relations with the rest of the Groups. On the other hand, if the Groups are too small and too many, relations among groups will become too complex.

There was an effort to find the optimal size (in terms of population) and number of Groups. There were two other factors that determined the optimal size. One was to try to fit most countries in one of the Groups. The other was Group homogeneity. These factors resulted in AntiNWO's final plan as the best alternative after several alternatives were examined. Some of the alternatives are described in the articles about AntiNWO's Plan B.

AntiNWO's final grouping has 10+2 Groups; 1) North America 2) South & Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe and Central Asia 5) Arab countries 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia and Oceania 11) India 12) China. It will make more sense if we see the thirty largest countries in terms of population.

The ten largest countries, their population in millions and their percentage of total global population are; 1) India 1,417,5  17.3% 2) China 1,408,3  17.1% 3) United States 340,1  4.1% 4) Indonesia 284,4  3.5% 5) Pakistan 241,5  2.9% 6) Nigeria 223,8  2.7% 7) Brazil 213,4  2.6% 8) Bangladesh 169,8  2.1% 9) Russia 146  1.8% 10) Mexico 130,6  1.6%

The twenty countries that follow and their population in millions are: Japan 123,2, Philippines 114,1, Congo 112,8, Ethiopia 111,7, Egypt 107,3, Vietnam 101,3, Iran 86, Turkey 85,7, Germany 83,5, United Kingdom 69,3, France 68,7, Tanzania 68,2, Thailand 65,9, South Africa 63,1, Italy 59, Kenya 53,3, Colombia 53,1, Sudan 51,7, Myanmar 51,3, South Korea 51,2.

There are two countries in the world with huge population, India and China. Together they have more than one third of the world's population. India and China have more than four times larger population than the third country in the list, USA. If China and India were in a Group, there should be four Groups with roughly two billion people each. AntiNWO's plan has this as an option, if this seems to be helpful.

There is the option of FOUR COALITIONS of GROUPS to be DECIDED in the FUTURE. The 10+2 Groups could form four Coalitions as follows; 1) China + 1 Group 2) India + 1 Group 2) 4 Groups 4) 4 Groups. It would be a mistake to try to form four Coalitions now. First the Groups have to be formed and establish relations among them. After that, it should be decided if Coalitions would be helpful. The DECISION about COALITIONS should be left for the DISTANT FUTURE.

USA ranks third with a population of 340,1 million. With the exception of India and China, all the other countries can fit in a Group that has a population roughly in the range 400 - 500 million. There are no big differences in the populations of the ten Groups. There is as much homogeneity as possible. Groups are NOT too BIG with relative HOMOGENEITY and can FUNCTION BETTER. Also in this way, GROUPS can have CLOSER RELATIONS among them.

AntiNWO highly recommends further division in Groups with Subgroups and Regions wherever this is possible. Subgroups and Regions could function even better than Groups because they are smaller and more homogeneous. These could be relatively autonomous and establish their own external relations. Subgroups and Regions facilitate even further Group functionality and Group relations.