Obstacles to better future

In the previous article we stated that dividing EU and Europe in two Groups is a win - win situation. If Western and Eastern Europe separate, it will be better for both sides. Both Western and Eastern Europe will benefit. For WESTERN EUROPE it will be a BETTER FUTURE while for EASTERN EUROPE it will be a GREAT FUTURE. While both sides benefit, Eastern Europe benefits much more.

Countries that are at a lower level of economic development have more room to develop. So if they do things the right way, they can have much higher growth rates than countries at a higher level of economic development. Economic development is generally shown by GDP per capita in purchasing power parity. Countries that are economically developed have high GDP per capita.

This is the rule but there are exceptions. Some countries have high per capita income (GDP) because they have abundance of natural resources, like oil. But as a general rule, GDP per capita ppp is a good indicator of economic development. Nominal values should not be used because they are affected by price levels. As it can be seen from Table A of Appendix 4, Eastern Europe has a lower level of economic development than Western.

The numbers are not the most recent but the ranking and the differences do not change much from year to year. In Table A, GDP per capita for Southern Caucasus countries (Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan), Central Asian countries (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan), Turkiye, Israel are also shown because they may be included in Eastern European Group. All countries are fifty.

Let's look at an example. Western Europe's growth rate will be 1,5% and Eastern Europe's 2% if they are together in one Group, EU. If they separate in two Groups, Western Europe could have 2,5 % growth rate and Eastern Europe 4 %. So it is a win - win situation but Eastern Europe benefits much more. While Western Europe has a 1% increase in growth rates, Eastern Europe has 2%.

This is a hypothetical example to demonstrate how in a win - win situation, one side can benefit more. What matters more are the improvements in growth rates that countries will have. Growth rates should be examined for many years. Growth rate in one year only does not show much. Average annual real growth rates of fifty seven countries are shown in Table B of Appendix 4, for the period 2013-2023. Some more countries were added to those of Table A. 

Growth rates of Western Europe's Big Four were; Italy 0,686%, France 1,083%, Germany 1,085%, UK 1,603%. USA has 25% higher per capita income (GDP) than Germany which has the highest among the four. They are all below USA in terms of per capita income (GDP) so they are at a lower level of economic development. They should have higher growth rate than USA's which was 2,305%. Due to their participation in EU, they can't have as high growth rates as they would have otherwise.

Australia and New Zealand are two countries that are also economically advanced. They had 2,388% and 2,806% average annual growth rate. Western Europe's Big Four should have at least 2% growth rate and probably more than 2,5%. It is participation in EU that is not allowing this to happen. EU is harmful to all countries, Western and Eastern European but It is more harmful to Eastern European countries.

Some Eastern European countries have good growth rate. It could have been better if they were not in EU. Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Georgia, Moldova, Armenia, Kyrgyzstan, Israel have higher and are not in EU. Damage due to EU participation is done slowly. Greece is the Eastern European country that has been in EU the longest time, since 1981. It had among the lowest growth rate, 0,777%. All Eastern European countries will eventually end up like Greece, a total economic disaster.

Germany's growth rate would have been even worse than actual. Germany has a high trade surplus, 5,90% and this contributed part of the growth. We would have to examine the increase of Germany's surplus during the period 2013 - 2023 to determine how much of the growth was due to trade surplus. When countries have high growth surpluses, part of their growth is accomplished by taking GDP from other countries and decreasing their growth rate. France, UK, Italy do not have high trade surpluses.

Usually many factors have an effect on economic measures. Division of EU and Europe in two Groups will have a positive effect on Germany's growth rates. But Germany may have to decrease trade surplus and this will have a negative effect on growth rates. There may be other factors affecting growth rates and we can't predict what the overall impact of all factors will be. Solely the division of EU and Europe in two Groups will have a positive effect.

The most important benefit of EU's and Europe's division in two Groups is improvement in growth rates. But there are many benefits and some of them contribute to the improvement in growth rates. Groups will be more homogeneous economically, racially, culturally. Per capita income (GDP) disparity will decrease and people will be with more similar people. Both groups will be more organized. Policies will be more suitable to the conditions in countries.

AntiNWO's superb Group organizational and economic model will be extremely beneficial for Eastern European Group. This will make things even better. It gives power to nations but at the same time takes advantage of participation in a group. Western European Group could adopt that model and benefit more as well. Even if they don't (adopt it) they will benefit just by having two separate Groups in EU and Europe.

It was mentioned that agreements with USA, China, India are ready for Eastern European Group. They will include trading, investments, joint developments and productions, scientific and educational cooperation, cultural exchanges etc. Western European Group is not prohibited from making similar Agreements. They are not prohibited from making Agreements with Eastern European Group either.

The problem is that most EU countries will not participate in New Yalta Agreement where agreements regarding Group relations are expected to be made as well. So EU countries will not participate in these either. They could make the agreements later. But first Western European Group should be in existence. NWO is delaying that and harming Western and Eastern Europe.

Only after Western European Group is created, there can be agreements with other Groups. There are two ways division can happen. The most reasonable one is if Eastern European countries spin off from EU, since their population is a little more than a hundred and ten million. Alternatively, Western European countries could spin off from EU and immediately form Western European Group.

NWO - EU fanatics in Western Europe, like Macron, Soltz, Merz etc are obstacles to a better future. They are enemies of Western Europeans. They do not serve the people but NWO's goals. They should be replaced the soonest possible with AntiNWO governments that serve the people. These will implement AntiNWO's plan and bring a better future to Western Europeans and a great future to Eastern Europeans.

Quadrillions damage by EU   All benefit   Price level consequences   Trade war   USA’s tariffs