Sum up Plan B

We will sum up Plan B and add some points. Plan A's grouping can be considered an alternative of Plan B. In NWO's ridiculous plan, there are four Unions, European, American, Asian, African. These are very heterogenous and have very big differences in population. In AntiNWO's magnificent Plan B, there are four Coalitions of Groups that resemble the four Unions of NWO's plan but conversely have roughly equal population.

Groups should be as homogeneous as possible. The Groups' populations do not need to be roughly equal but there should be a range, a lower and an upper limit. The smaller the range, the more even the populations will be. Relations in Coalitions will be loose while in the Groups they will be closer. The Group organizational and economic model and most points explained in Plan A, can also be applied in Plan B.

Europe's population is 745,97 mln. Next to Europe - Asia borders are two small Christian countries, Georgia and Armenia. They should be included in European Groups because all the countries that follow are Muslim. With them, Europe's population becomes 752,66 mln. In NWO's insane plan, Europe is one Group, damned EU, with projected population 597,05 mln. Russia is excluded because it is Europe's leading country. Belarus remains an ally of Russia.

According to AntiNWO's Plans, there should be at least two Groups in Europe. Russia should be included because it is Europe's leading country. USA's population is 335,16 mln. If the Group's upper limit is 300 mln, USA does not have to be in a Group. In that case, there can be three Groups in Europe, as presented in "Endless alternatives" and Appendix 19. Muslim countries (not all of them) form also three Groups.

The problem with this option is Canada. It has borders only with USA. While Mexico can be in a different Group than USA, Canada can only be in a) a Group with USA b) no Group. If we add Canada's population to USA's, the sum is 375,36 mln. So the upper limit in that case should be 400 mln. If the range is 300 - 400 mln, there can be two Groups in Europe.

Also there will be two Groups in Muslim countries and two in Central and South America, as shown in "Example of Plan B" and Appendix 18. Because Canada must be in a Group with USA, two Groups in Europe are more likely than three or four. So we should examine this scenario a little further. In addition to the alternative of Appendix 18, more options are shown in "Plan B is process".

For population evenness, Italy must be included in eastern Group 5. The terms eastern and western denote the Group's geographic location, not Eastern-Western Europe. Eastern Group can have Western European countries and vice versa. An internal matter of Groups are Subgroups. Although optional, they can be a very useful feature, especially if they have relative autonomy. Two alternatives, with two Subgroups in each European Group are presented in Appendix 20.

In AntiNWO's plan, most decisions will be made at national level. Above that level, there will be only the necessary requirements for the functionality of Regions, Subgroups, Groups. If Subgroups have relative autonomy, more decisions will be made at Subgroup level than at Group level. So Subgroups will be more important than the Group. Even if there are not formal Subgroups, there can be informal.

In addition to the two small Christian countries that were added (Armenia, Georgia), it is possible to extend the eastern Group even more in Asia. Kazakhstan's addition was examined in "Plan B is a process". In Plan A's Grouping a larger part is added. Originally, Turkiye was included in eastern European Group. Turkiye would be on the margin of a Group with Christian countries.

It can have an important role only in the Muslim world. So, there was a swap with Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan) and Azerbaijan which have roughly the same population with Turkiye. If eastern European Group is extended more into Asia, western European Group can become a little larger. Originally, Italy was in western European Group. Alternatively, there can be a swap between Italy and German Wannabes (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries). They have roughly the same population.

So there are two broad scenarios to have two European Groups. In each there are more options. In the first, only European countries participate and two small Christian countries on the Europe - Asia borders are added. Consequently, USA forms a Group only with Canada and there are three Groups with 300-400 mln range in the American Continent. In the second, eastern Group is extended and western becomes a little larger. In that case, Mexico is added to USA - Canada and the American continent has two Groups with roughly equal population.

Muslim countries also form two Groups in both scenarios but in the second Pakistan is added. This is Plan A's grouping; 1) North America 2) South and Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe 5) Arab countries 6) North Sub-Saharan Africa 7) South Sub-Saharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia - Oceania 11) India 12) China.

There can also be four Groups in Europe. This scenario is not very likely but still a possibility. In that case, the Subgroups of the "two part division" become Groups. The "two part division" can be the "clean" (only European countries) or the extended version. There are more alternatives, really endless. Currently no option is ruled out. Nevertheless, the division of Europe in two Groups, seems the most likely to happen. 

It has to be decided if it will be the "clean" or the extended version, only European countries (plus Georgia and Armenia) or part of Asia added to eastern Group, Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan (or Turkiye). We need to note that Albania and Bosnia are Muslim but because of their geographic location, they can be placed only in eastern European Group. Bosnia has a considerable percentage of Orthodox Christians.

What can never happen is NWO's Grouping. Europe can't be one Group and Russia - Belarus can't be separated from Eastern Europe. In AntiNWO's plans, Europe is divided in AT LEAST TWO Groups. Probably there will be two. Also Russia and Belarus are together with a large part of Eastern Europe, if not all. Both these are redlines that can't be crossed, non negotiable points.

Although no alternative is ruled out at this point, most likely the decision would be between a "clean" and an extended eastern European Group. If it is the "clean" version, USA will form a Group only with Canada. If it is the extended version, Mexico will be added and there will be the Grouping of Plan A. Of course this is not the end of decision making but only the beginning.

There are many issues that should be decided. Most of them are at Group or lower level, forming Subgroups - Regions, Group organizational and economic plan, etc. These should concern Groups, Subgroups, Regions. The only decision above Group level is formation of Coalitions. This can happen much later but when forming Groups, there should be a provision to fit them into four Coalitions with roughly equal population.