Systems deception

People in countries with lower per capita income believe that if they participate in EU they will reach the income of richer countries. Perhaps this is the most important reason they want to participate. Of course this is a big lie as it has been shown. In reality the opposite happens. Countries with lower income lose while countries with higher income benefit. This is due to differences in productivity and EU' defective model.

People in less developed countries also believe that if they participate in EU, their countries will become more organized and better systems will be implemented. Of course this is another EU - NWO deception, a big lie as it will become evident. First of all countries do not need to be in a malfunctioning monstrosity like EU in order to be better organized and implement better systems.

Many people have probably seen the movie 'The Last Samurai'. Captain Nathan Algren (Tom Cruz) goes to Japan to train Japanese in more advanced military methods. This supposedly happened during Meiji Restoration. Emperor Meiji adopted many of the world's best systems. Captain Nathan Algren ends up allying with Meiji's opponents, the more traditional. Even if Japan adopted many systems from abroad, it preserved its culture and traditions. It is one of the most traditional countries.

Japan was not a member of a failed Union like EU. Meiji's Restoration was at the end of 19th century. At that time, there were no airplanes, no TV, no Internet. Telephone was invented during Meiji's restoration but probably it was not broadly used. Although telephone existed as an invention, telephones were not used. Something similar occurred with radio. It was invented but not used.

So, in a time with no telephone, no radio, no TV, no internet, no airplanes, Japan succeeded in adopting some of the world's best systems. Today it would be much easier for a country to do the same. Japanese had to search a lot to find the country that had the best systems in a certain field. Today, this is done in five minutes with an Internet search.

Participation in EU is not only unnecessary to adopt best systems but it is also an obstacle. EU countries generally do not have the best systems in the World. Let's look at some cases. According to The Global Economy, the best railway systems are in Japan, Hong Kong, Switzerland, South Korea, Singapore. France is in 13th position and Germany in 15th. USA is in 11th place.

The best air transport systems are in Singapore, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Finland, Japan. USA is again in 11th place. France and Germany are further down the list, in 23rd and 24th position respectively. The best road transport systems are in Singapore, Netherlands, Switzerland, Hong Kong, Japan. France is in 18th position and Germany in 20th.

In terms of sea transport systems, the first five positions have Singapore, Finland, Netherlands, Hong Kong, Denmark. USA is in 10th, France in 18th and Germany in 19th place. Germany and France are considered EU's leading countries and from the cases examined, the are not doing so well. Of course there are other systems in education, health, public safety, national defense, natural disaster handling etc.

In Eastern European Group's plan, there is provision for best system's adoption. The Group will find the best systems and make them available to the countries, to implement them voluntarily. Of course which country would not want to have the best systems in the world? So even if it will be on a voluntary basis, all countries most likely will adopt them.

Cooperation with the governments of the countries that have the best systems is useful but not necessary. Experts on these systems can be found and paid well in order to transfer their knowledge. Although it is preferable, it does not have to be from No 1 country on the list. If there are difficulties with that, Group 4 will move down the list, to the second, third, fourth, fifth position but not below that.

Probably there would not be much difference among the top five systems. Other Groups can do the same. Group 4 of Eastern Europe could assist them, if they have good relations, so that they do not have to do all the work from start. The best systems will be not only in public but in private sector as well. Of course, not all systems can be adopted at once. This will have to be done gradually.

Japanese showed the right way, more than 150 years ago. ADOPT BEST SYSTEMS from abroad but PRESERVE CULTURE AND TRADITIONS. Participation in EU is only an obstacle in adopting the worl's best systems. Eastern European countries have to leave EU immediately. A great future awaits ahead. There is no reason to delay. The sooner this travesty ends, EU participation, the better it is.