Two Groups cases

In the previous article, it was explained that two-Groups Subcoalitions are better than three-Groups. There can be eight two-Groups Subcoalitions. These can be the building blocks of Coalitions. One Subcoalition will be in China's and another in India's Coalition. In the rest of the Coalitions, there will be three two-Groups Subcoalitions. We will further examine some possible two-Groups Subcoalitions.

E1-E2 is EU as in NWO's plan, plus Russia-Belarus. Given that many countries in those two Groups are already in EU, E1-EU Subcoalition will make things easier. We must point out that SUBCOALITIONS are NOT GROUPS. Subcoalitions are clusters of two or three Groups that have closer relations. Relations in Subcoalitions are closer than in Coalitions but much looser than relations in Groups.

If there is E1-E2 Subcoalition, the countries in E2 will NOT be under the RULE of BRUSSELS. Brussels will oppress only the countries in E1. However, E2 will be the Group with which E1 will have the closest relations. E1-E2 will be EU (as in NWO's plan) plus Russia and Belarus but organized in a different way. E1 will be similar to EU but E2 will be different. These two Groups will have the closest relations but they will not be one Group.

For those that support EU, it is a very good alternative. There are a few problems though. EU is NWO's cornerstone. EU supporters are NWO supporters. E1-E2 is not in NWO's plan but in AntiNWO's. Western Europe is the main supporter of NWO's plan. Those that would prefer E1-E2 Subcoalition in AntiNWO's plan, are the main supporters of NWO's plan and the main opponents of AntiNWO's plan.

These people are psychotics. They are obsessed with NWO's failed plan. All they think is NWO's plan. They can't see anything else. Suppose that with some magical way, NWO's fanatics in Western Europe support AntiNWO's superb plan. There is another problem though. They are not only obsessed with NWO's plan. They are also obsessed with free trade and free movement generally which are part of NWO's plan.

If in Western European Group E1, they want free trade, they should form a Coalition with India and Southern American Group A3. Recently, Western European NWO imposed two trade deals on EU, one with India and one with Mercosur. A3 is Mercosur plus Bolivia, Chile, Peru. Eventually, the two deals will lead to free trade zones. In I-E1-A3 Coalition, Western European NWO can have unlimited free trade.

One alternative may be to replace NWO governments in Western Europe. First of all, it is not very likely that opposition may come to power in enough Western European countries any time soon. Next presidential elections in France are in April 2027 but next federal elections in Germany are in March 2029. Additionaly, the opinion of opposition parties in Western Europe, regarding EU and NWO issues is not very clear.

Initially, Italy's prime minister Meloni seemed to be on AntiNWO's side but turned to be an EU supporter and a big dissapointment for AntiNWO. All those that support EU are on NWO side. EU is NWO's cornerstone, the first and most important step. EU is to AntiNWO what a red rag is to a bull. One of AntiNWO's main goals is to end that horrible monstrosity, EU.

Nevertheless, E1-E2 SUBCOALITION is ACCEPTABLE by AntiNWO. That could be common ground in Europe between NWO and AntiNWO. It is not impossible to happen. Western European governments and parties must realize that NWO's highly defective plan from the Dark Ages will end up in the garbage can. The closest alternative to EU in AntiNWO's plan is E1-E2 Subcoalition. For that to happen, NWO's maniacs in Westen Europe must support AntiNWO's superb plan.

Suppose that Western European governments and parties insist with manic obsession on NWO's plan that has failed tremendously. That is very likely. Geographic proximity is not required in Subcoalitions but preferable. The other Groups that are next to E2 are R1 (Japan, S. Korea etc) and the three Muslim Groups M1, M2, M3. If spatial proximity is desirable, E2 has to form one of the four Subcoalitions E2-R1, E2-M1, E2-M2, E2-M3.

With R1, there is economic and geographic (spatial) proximity. Since E1-E2 Subcoalition may be difficult to happen due to Western Europe's manic obsession with a highly defective plan from the Dark Ages, there have been some initial talks between E2 and R1 that went well. It is very ealry though to claim that there will certainly be an E2-R1 SUBCOALITION but this is a POSSIBILITY.

A very important point is that E2 is among the LEADERS of AntiNWO's plan. So far, the leaders are North American Group A1, China and Northern - Eastern European E2. India can become a leader if it cancels the deal with EU. The GROUPS that will be in the SAME SUBCOALITION with A1 and E2 will be LEADERS too. In R1, they are aware that if they are in a Subcoalition with E2, they will be INCLUDED in the LEADERS as well.

There are three ways to have an M (Muslim) two-Groups Subcoalition; 1) M3-M2 2) M1-M2 3) M1-M3. In the third one there is no geographic proximity. Until recenlty, countries in M3 and M2 generally had good relations. Lately, they have been some problems. USA has been using military bases in M2 countries and Iran has been bombarding some of these bases. Iran is in M3 with Pakistan and Afghanistan.

It is uncertain how the situation may develop. Because of the war between Iran and USA-Israel, relations between Iran and countries in M2 may become bad. In that case, an M3-M2 Subcoalition may not be possible. There could be an M1-M2 Subcoalition. In this happens, the only Group next to M3 will be E2. China and India are also next to M3 but in this article we are examining two-Groups Subcoalitions.

Suppose that Iran's relations with countries in M2 do not get too bad because of the war. In that case, an M3-M2 Subcoalition is a good option. Mediterranean Arab Group M1 could be placed with Western European Group E1. So three two-Groups Subcoalitions could be E2-R1, M3-M2, E1-M1. The four Subsaharan Groups could form two more two-Groups Subcoalitions, for instance S1-S2 and S3-S4,

In the Rest of Asia plus Oceania, R2-R3 Subcoalition can be based on ASEAN. There will be one R (Rest of Asia plus Oceania) Group left, R4 which will have Oceania (Australia, New Zealand etc). This could form a Subcoalition with South American Group A3. If all Subcoalitions have two Groups, only two of the three American Groups can be in the same Subcoalition.

The other will be in a Subcoalition with an non A (American) Group that will be an ocean apart. So finally, the eight two-Groups Subcoalitions will be 1) A1-A2 2) A3-R4 3) E2-R1 4) E1-M1 5) M3-M2 6) R2-R3 7) S1-S2 8) S3-S4. There are TWO MILLION TWENTY SEVEN THOUSAND and TWENTY FOUR (2.027.024) MORE WAYS to form eight two-Groups Subcoalitions. We will see a few more in next article.