Left out handling

In AntiNWO's plan, there are two Groups in Europe, Western and Eastern. Recently, AntiNWO finalized the composition of the two Groups. For a long time, in our articles, we gave many reasons Eastern European countries should exit EU. We tried to encourage them to do what is right. We wanted to give them the chance to separate from Western European countries with dignity.

NWO-EU propaganda is full of lies. They claim that if Eastern European countries are in EU, they will reach the per capita income of Western European countries. The exact opposite is true. Only if they have their own separate Group, they will be able to converge with Western European countries in terms of per capita income. Only in a separate Group, they will have high growth rates.

Eastern Europe is much different than Western. There are two Europes, two distinct areas in Europe. Historically, Eastern Europe has followed a different route than Western. Western Europeans originate from Celtic, Germanic and Roman tribes. Eastern Europeans originate from Slavic and Greco-Thraco-Illyrian tribes. This has an impact on culture and civilization.

The foundation of Western European civilization was Roman, which had a strong influence from Hellenic (Greek). The foundation of Eastern European culture-civilization was Hellenistic, which was Hellenic with significant influence from Eastern. Its evolution was Byzantine with notable influence from Slavic. In Western Europe, culture-civilization mix is Roman-Celtic-Germanic. In Eastern Europe, it is Hellenic, Slavic, Eastern, Thracian, Illyrian.

During communist era, Eastern Europeans had their own Group of economic cooperation, Comecon. It was larger than EU. It started one decade before EU. In 1958, the first year of EEC, Comecon had twice the population of EEC. Gradually, EEC was enlarged and in 1995, EEC which had become EU, had almost equal (97,4%) population with Comecon.

Comecon stopped operating when communism fell. By 1995, almost all Western European countries had been added in EU. Malta was added in 2004. Norway, Switzerland, Iceland never became members. The only anomaly was Greece, the only Eastern European country. Everything was ready in 1990's. Comecon should have continued as a non communist Group with the original membership of 1949.

The only anomaly in a Group of Western European countries should had been corrected. Greece (Hellas) should have exited EU and join Comecon's continuation. The reasons were explained in Greece is Eastern Europe and Greek economic tragedy. Cyprus goes together with Greece. It became a member of EU in 2004. Israel also could have joined Comecon's continuation.

Unfortunately, the right path was not followed in 1990's. NWO followed a dysfunctional, irrational, unrealistic plan that has caused very many problems. What was not done in 1990's, should happen now. Corrections should be made. SEPERATION is BENEFICIAL for both WESTERN and EASTERN Europe. They will separate because it was a huge mistake to add Eastern European countries in a Western European Group.

Western European voters never wanted that to happen. Western European governments acted against their voters' will. They served NWO's plan and not their voters' interests. So people in Western Europe will vote out NWO parties and politicians and vote in AntiNWO parties that support separation of Western and Eastern Europe and other popular positions of AntiNWO's plan.

Probably, there are people in EU's Eastern European countries that have not been convinced so far with our arguments to leave EU. The STRONGEST of all ARGUMENTS is that they will be LEFT OUT. They are the ones that will have the PROBLEM. EU will continue as Western European Group with 75% of the population. Later on, UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland could be added and the population of the Group will not be much lower than EU's current.

AntiNWO can GUARANTEE that eventually this will HAPPEN. This is a SERIOUS PROBLEM for Eastern European countries and requires SPECIAL HANDLING. Eastern European countries still have ENOUGH TIME to MANAGE the COMING CRISIS. EASTERN EUROPEANS should VOTE for PARTIES that can HANDLE the LEFT OUT PROBLEM in the BEST POSSIBLE WAY. As it has been explained, there are two routes that can be followed.

The best approach, the one AntiNWO recommends is two independent Groups. Eastern European countries will exit EU and form a temporary independent Group. There will be smooth transition. For some time, matters will remain as they were in EU. Gradually, they will prepare to merge with CIS and become a relatively autonomous subGroup of Eastern European Group. At the same time, countries that are not EU members can be added to the temporary Group.

The process itself guarantees that there will be two relatively autonomous subgroups in Eastern European Group. If this does not happen, there will be a gradual enlargement of CIS, until all countries that are supposed to be in Eastern European Group are included. With this process, it is questionable if there will be two relatively autonomous groups. It is not impossible but it is not very likely either.

When Eastern European countries will be LEFT OUT of EU, they will have only two options. One will be to join CIS enlargement and the other not to be in any Group. Most countries will eventually join CIS enlargement, even though some may not do it right away. Since they will eventually END UP in EASTERN EUROPEAN GROUP, the SOONEST they do it, the BETTER it will be for them.

Voters in Eastern European EU countries should realize that they have only two options; a) in Eastern European Group b) in no Group. PARTICIPATION in EU is NOT an OPTION, in the long run. Western European countries will separate because that is what Western European voters want. They will vote for AntiNWO parties that will take their countries out of EU, in order to form Western European Group right away.

Our guess is that most voters will prefer to be in Eastern European Group than in no Group. If this is their choice, they must decide which of the two approaches they prefer a) two independent Groups for adequate time b) CIS enlargement. Our guess is that they will prefer the first one. So they should VOTE for ANTINWO parties and politicians that will EXIT EU to FORM a temporary INDEPENDENT Group.

They should do that, even though they may prefer to participate in EU. Because they must realize that PARTICIPATION in EU is NOT an OPTION. We keep repeating it because this must be very well understood. It is reasonable to assume that voters who want participation in EU would prefer the process of two independent Groups, instead of CIS enlargment. They should CHOOSE among the AVAILABLE OPTIONS.

We should point out that NOT ALL EASTERN EUROPEAN countries MUST EXIT from EU to FORM a TEMPORARY INDEPENDENT GROUP. It can be done with some countries. Suppose that this does not happen. For those voters that prefer their country to be in Eastern European Group rather than in no Group, the best available option is to do it the soonest possible. So they should vote for AntiNWO parties that will take their country out of EU to join CIS enlargement.