Compromising Subgroup autonomy

According to AntiNWO's superb plan, there will be two Groups in Europe, Western and Eastern. It is certain that eventually, all or most of the countries that are designated to be in Eastern Group will participate. What is questionable is the way this will happen. There are two alternatives; a) two autonomous Groups in Eastern Europe for some time b) CIS enlargement.

The first will certainly result in two relatively autonomous Subgroups but this is questionable in CIS enlargement. In Table B of Appendix 24, the two Subgroups are shown. Categories A1 and A2 will be Western SubGroup while Category B will be Eastern. Two autonomous Groups approach is preferable for reasons explained in previous articles. It is also a middle of the way, compromising solution.

According to NWO's disastrous plan, countries of Western Subgroup will be in EU (except Israel). Thirteen of these, shown in Category A1, are already members. The other seven (without Israel) in Category A2 will join in the future. For many decades, these countries had their own Group of economic cooperation, Comecon. It should had continued in the 1990's as a non-communist Group with the original membership of 1949.

The only Eastern European country that did not participate in Comecon was Hellas (Greece) which became an EEC member in 1981. That was a huge mistake and a big anomaly. In Greece is Eastern Europe and Greek economic tragedy, it was explained why Hellas (Greece) should be together with the rest of Eastern European countries in non - communist continuation of Comecon.

EU should have remained with the 1995 membership with the exception of Greece and the addition of Malta. But twelve more mistakes were made in 2004 and later. Now thirteen Eastern European countries are in EU. Countries of Category A2 are supposed to be added in EU. So we have two different placements for the countries in Western Subgroup (Categories A1 and A2).

One is together with Western European countries, according to NWO's dysfunctional plan. The other is together with the rest of ex-communist countries of Category B, in Comecon's continuation. Is there a middle of the way, compromising approach? Yes, there is. That would be if these countries had a separate autonomous Group, not with Western European countries but not with Category B countries either.

If these countries are in EU, they will be closer to Western Europe and further from Russia. If they are in Comecon's continuation, with no autonomous Subgroups, they would be closer to Russia and further from Western Europe. The best compromising solution would be if these countries formed an autonomous Group and managed their relations with Western Europe and Russia according to their benefit.

But there is a problem with population. Countries of Categories A1 and A2 have a total population of one hundred and eighty million (181.242.130). One of the main shortcomings of NWO's plan is the big population difference of the four Unions, European, Asian, African, American. This is also one of the main advantages in AntiNWO's plan. The population differences between AntiNWO's Groups is very small, the smallest possible.

Together, Categories A1, A2 and B have a total population (435.860.504) which is not much different than that of Western European Group (418.841.563) and the rest of the Groups in AntiNWO's plan. For population reasons, countries in categories A1 and A2 can't be an autonomous Group forever although than can start as one. Eventually, they should form a Group with the countries of Category B.

It is totally insane to even think that Eastern European countries can be in the same Group with countries like France and Germany and not with Russia. It is crazy to even express such an opinion and people who do that should receive treatment in a mental institution. Eastern European countries are much more similar to Russia and very different from Western European countries.

All Eastern European countries should be in the same Group with Russia for historical, cultural, racial, religious reasons that have been explained in many previous articles. Russia is an integral part of Eastern Europe and can never be separated from the rest of it. Those people that planned separation of Russia from the rest of Eastern Europe are disturbed, dysfunctional, abnormal, irrational individuals.

But there is still a middle of the way compromising solution. AntiNWO has the provision for even smaller units than Groups, Subgroups and Regions. So the Eastern European countries that are supposed to be in EU according to NWO's dysfunctional plan, can be a relatively autonomous Western Subgroup of Eastern European Group. They will have relations with Russia since they will be in the same Group but can also manage independently their affairs, including external relations.

In Double orientation a plus, it was suggested that Western Subgroup could have western orientation and develop external relations with Western Europe and North America. Eastern Subgroup could have eastern orientation and have external relations with China, Turkiye, Iran etc. That would not be a problem but instead a big plus, something beneficial for the Eastern European Group overall.

The two Subgroups can have internal relations with each other inside the Group, while having different orientation in their external relations. Orientation does not mean exclusive relations but closer. So Western Subgroup will not be prohibited from having external relations with regions of the world other than Western Europe and North America. Likewise, Eastern Subgroup will not be prohibited from establishing relations with areas or countries other than China, Turkiye, Iran etc.

In Group Orientation, we took this suggestion a step further. Western Subgroup will be divided into two regions, Northern A1 and Southern A2. Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries, Ukraine will be in Northern. Balkan countries, Hungary, Slovakia, Israel will be in Southern. Also Eastern Subgroup will be divided into two Regions, Christian "European" B1 and and Muslim Asian B2.

In Region B1 there will be Christian countries; Russia, Belarus, Georgia, Armenia. These are also somewhat "European". Belarus is entirely in Europe. Russia was entirely in Europe until 17th century, before Siberia's conquest (1581-1778 AD). Today, three quarters (75%) of Russia's population and the largest cities are in Europe. Also 85% of Siberia's population have European ancestry.

Caucasus and Urals are the conventional boundaries between Asia and Europe. Georgia and Armenia are next to Caucasus, at the borders between Europe and Asia. So they can be considered somewhat "European", although formally in Asia. Region B2 will have Muslim countries; Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Azerbaijan. Five of these countries are entirely in Asia. Azerbaijan is at European-Asian borders.

In Western Subgroup, Northern Region A1 could have orientation towards Western Europe and Southern Region A2 towards North America. Muslim countries can have closer relations with Muslim countries like Turkiye and Iran while Region B1 can have closer relations with China and other countries/areas. Obviously, each country will also develop its own relations with countries from other Groups.

Nevertheless, overall Western and Eastern Subgroups can have different orientations regarding their external relations. The autonomy of the Subgroups will allow Western Subgroup to retain relations with Western Europe and improve relations with North America. This can be done in two ways; a) all Subgroup has orientation towards Western Europe and North America b) Region A1 is oriented towards Western Europe and Region A2 towards North America.

There will certainly be two relatively autonomous Subgroups in Eastern European Group, only if some countries in Western Subgroup manage to form a temporary autonomous Group. The process itself guarantees that. The CIS enlargement approach makes this more difficult to happen. Autonomy in external relations is another reason AntiNWO's recommended approach should be followed and a temporary autonomous Group should be formed.