NWO's vs AntiNWO's plan

There are only two global plans, NWO's and AntiNWO's. Both are full packages. Someone can't take only part of the package but has to accept or reject the whole package. This will be explained in next article. Before this is done, it would be wise to review briefly the main differences between the two full packages. They have been presented very thoroughly in many previous articles.

One major difference is grouping. In NWO's plan, there are four pseudo-continental Unions; European, African, American, Asian. The difference in populations is very big. Asian Union has seven times more population than European. Also, there is big heterogeneity inside all Groups (Unions) but the bigger they get in terms of population, the more heterogeneous the become. Asian Union is extremely heterogeneous.

NWO's plan separates Arab countries, some are in African Union and the rest in Asian Union. It separates Russia and Belarus from the rest of Eastern European countries. On the other hand, it puts together North Africa with Subsaharan Africa and South - Central America with North America. AntiNWO's plan places all Arab countries in the same Group and Russia - Belarus with Eastern European countries. It separates South and Central from North America and Western Europe from Eastern.

In AntiNWO's plan, there are 10+2 Groups; 1) North America 2) South and Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe and Central Asia 5) Arab countries 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia and Oceania 11) India 12) China. AntiNWO's ten Groups have roughly equal population, the differences are small.

AntiNWO's Groups are smaller and a lot more homogeneous than NWO's. Also, there can be even more homogeneity with further division of Groups into Subgroups and Regions. In AntiNWO's plan, people will be together with similar people to the extent possible. They will be able to cooperate and communicate better inside Groups, Subgroups and Regions. In addition to internal relations in the Groups, there will be external relations between Groups.

In NWO's plan, the four pseudo-continental Unions will be under a Global Government, controlled by NWO's vicious cabal. AntiNWO strongly opposes global government. Still there are very few matters that require handling at global level. Instead of Global Government, AntiNWO has the 10+2 Council which will deal only with the very few global matters.

Another big difference is the power nations and supranational entities will have. NWO's vicious cabal is obsessed with supranational. They want to take away all the powers from nations and give them to supranational entities, the four Unions and the Global Government. In the long run, they will entirely abolish nations. In NWO's plan, nations will become extinct.

In AntiNWO's plan, supranational entities have the ABSOLUTELY MINIMUM AUTHORITY for their proper functioning. That could be NO AUTHORITY at all, if a Group decides that it is not needed. Unlike EU, Comecon had no supranational authority. AntiNWO does not support no supranational authority in a Group but the minimum required for its proper functioning. If the minimum required is none at all, it is fine with AntiNWO.

EU is NWO's organizational and economic model for Groups. The three other Unions will be exactly like EU. NWO' organizational and economic model is mandatory for Unions (Groups). AntiNWO's is not mandatory but it is expected that most, if not all Groups will implement it. In addition, the model will be modified according to each Group's special conditions.

The bodies of European Union are; Commission, two Councils, Parliament, Central Bank, Court of Justice, Court of Auditors. European Commission is the executive branch and has twenty seven commissioners, including the President. The commissioners are for EU what the ministers are for countries. Each commissioner has one area of responsibility.

There are two Councils, European Council which consists of presidents or prime ministers and the Council of the European Union which includes ministers and is also known informally as Council of Ministers. The participants in Council of Ministers change according to the topic. For instance, when economic issues are discussed, ministers of Economics - Finance participate. In reality, the Council of Ministers is several different Councils. 

AntiNWO's model keeps the Council that includes heads of states or governments. Instead of the Commission and the Council of Ministers, in AntiNWO's model, there is only a Council of Ministers. But the members of this Council do not change according to the topic. Each country will have a minister or deputy minister for Group Affairs. Their area of responsibility would be the Group matters and they will cooperate with other ministers and prime ministers or presidents in their countries.

There is no need for a separate Group Parliament like Europarliament since voters elect their representatives for national Parliaments. The only problem is that the number of MP's (Members of Parliament) are not proportional to the populations of countries. This can be solved with some simple mathematics. AntiNWO's system has one more advantage than saving taxpayers money and voters the trouble of EU elections.

In Europarliament, there is degressive proportionality. Smaller countries have larger percentage of MEP's (Members of Europarliament) than the percentage of their population. In Europarliament, proportionality remains the same for the whole term. It could only change in next elections. With AntiNWO's system, proportionality can easily change, even in every vote.

In NWO's plan, there is only one kind of Group membership, full. AntiNWO has at least two kinds. In addition to regular membership, trading partner status is also available. Trading partners have similar trading privileges with members but more autonomy. On the other hand, they do not participate in decision making and are not part of the Group's economic plan.

There are more than eighty thousand employees working for EU. This is close to two hundred employees per one million people. Most of them are in Brussels. Some are in Strasbourg (Europarliament), Luxembourg (Court of Justice, Court of Auditors) and Frankfurt (Central Bank). In AntiNWO's plan, Group's employees will be spread in all the countries. They will be employed by the Ministry of Group Affairs in each country.

Per ten thousand residents, total employees will be much less compared to EU's. For instance, they could be one hundred or fifty employees per one million residents. If there are capitals, a small fraction of the Group's employees could be located there. In AntiNWO's plan, capitals for Groups, Subgroups and Regions are optional. If there are no capitals, meetings will be held in the countries by rotation.

In NWO's model, there is free movement of people, products, capital. These create many problems. Economic cooperation can be effective, perhaps more, without these. Easier movement of people, products, capital can be facilitated without making it entirely free. Nevertheless, if a Group wants to have free movement of people, products, capital, AntiNWO will not oppose it but recommend extreme caution. 

The differences mentioned briefly above are not all the but some of the main. The differences between the two plans are AT LEAST in four areas; a) grouping b) power of supranational entities c) type and authority of global body d) organizational and economic model for Groups. Other areas could be Group relations, ideology etc. The two plans are the only two global plans. Both are full packages. After the brief review, this will be explained better in next article.