Coalitions’ supplement
Coalitions' supplement
COALITIONS of Groups are OPTIONAL. AntiNWO's ACTIVE SUPPORTERS will DECIDE if there will be Coalitions and how these will be. According to AntiNWO's plan, two Coalitions will have four Groups and two (Coalitions will have) two Groups. China's and India's Coalitions will have two Groups. Eventually, the two other Coalitions must have four Groups. But they could start with two or three Groups. There are many reasons something like that could happen.
In AntiNWO's spectacular plan there are 10+2 Groups; 1) North America 2) South & Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe & ACA 5) Arab Group 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia & Oceania 11) India 12) China. ACA is Azerbaijan and Central Asian countries. Instead of North-South, there can be East-West division in eastern Asia and Subsaharan Africa.
According to the AVAILABILITY REASONING, Coalitions should be formed with the Groups that are available. In "Pseudo-Coalitions" we explained that if only 1, 2, 4, 5 are the active supporters of AntiNWO's plan, they could form a complete Coalition. They do not need permission from other countries or other Groups. Also, not all countries need to participate in a Group. A core of countries would be enough.
Suppose that only 1, 4, 5 are AntiNWO's active supporters. They can still FORM an INCOMPLETE COALITION with three Groups. Eventually, a fourth Group will be added so that the Coalition becomes complete. What can be done if active supporters are six Groups? There can be two incomplete Coalitions with three Groups each. If the Groups are five, one Coalition will have three Groups and the other two.
If active supporters are 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10 there are ten (10) combinations of Coalitions. Since these are not too many we can show them; a) 1-2-4, 5-9-10 b) 1-2-5, 4-9-10 c) 1-2-9, 4-5-10 d) 1-2-10, 4-5-9 e) 1-4-5, 2-9-10 f) 1-4-9, 2-5-10 g) 1-4-10, 2-5-9 h) 1-5-9, 2-4-10 i) 1-5-10, 2-4-9 j) 1-9-10, 2-4-5. Decision makers can pick any one of these they like.
One reason to form incomplete Coalitions is not to have enough Groups available. But there is another reason. Suppose that the decision makers are 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12. Only four Groups will not participate 3, 8, 9, 10. These can be dumped in a Pseudo-Coalition and the rest can form three complete Coalitions. There are forty two (42) combinations of three Coalitions.
Suppose that the decision makers insist to have the Coalitions as follows; a) 1-2-3-4 b) 5-6-7-8 c) 9-11 d) 10-12. In that case, they can form incomplete Coalitions; a) 1-2-4 b) 5-6-7 c) 11 d) 12. Eventually, these Coalitions will become complete when one Group will be added in each Coalition. It is better to form Coalitions with available Groups even if these Coalitions are incomplete. It makes matters less complicated.
Let's go back to the previous example with the six decision makers. We pick the first combination 1-2-4, 5-9-10 but any one of the ten options can be used. At some time in the future, the two Subsaharan African Groups, 6 and 7, may decide to be in a Coalition. The two Coalitions will be complete 1-2-4-6, 5-7-9-10. Instead of the two Subsaharan African Groups, it could be the two opposing Groups, 3 and 8. So the Coalitions could be 1-2-3-4, 5-8-9-10.
Currently, it seems that the three categories of Groups are; a) active supporters 1-2-4-5-12 b) passive supporters 6-7-9-10-11 c) opponents 3-8. The opponents are not expected to participate initially in the decision making. They are stuck with NWO's failed plan. But after Coalitions are formed, most likely they will realize that NWO's RIDICULOUS PLAN is definitely where it BELONGS, in the TRASH CAN.
In the future, opponents could surpass passive supporters and participate in Coalitions before them. It seems that the three categories are as described PRESENTLY. But in the FUTURE, it could be DIFFERENT. When Groups and Coalitions are formed, it will be a WHOLE DIFFERENT BALL GAME. Only a few countries are needed to form a Group and this could be informal for some time. The Coalitions do not have to be complete from start.
Opponents and passive supporters will be DRAWN INTO this NEW GAME. They will HAVE TO PARTICIPATE because otherwise they could get a BAD PLACEMENT in the WORLD AFFAIRS that most likely will last for a VERY LONG TIME, a few centuries. ACTIVE SUPPORTERS should START this NEW GAME so that they MAKE the REST, passive supporters and opponents, GET INVOLVED as well.
One of the problems that concerns many people around the world is the war in Ukraine. We do not know what the decicion makers will decide regarding Coalitions. We do not even know which the decision makers will be. But it does NOT seem LIKELY that WESTERN and EASTERN EUROPE will be in the SAME COALITION. This is a possibility Ukrainians have to accept. It is USELESS for UKRAINIANS to talk with WESTERN EUROPEANS.
Further division in Groups is possible with Subgroups and Regions. These are optional. Likewise, further division is possible in Coalitions with Sub-Coalitions. The GROUPS in a SUBCOALITION will have CLOSER RELATIONS. Since there will be four Groups in each Coalition, Sub-Coalitions will have two Groups. There can be no Subcoalitions in China's and India's Coalitions because there will be only two Groups.
Suppose that a Coalition is 5-6-7-8. One Sub-Coalition could be 5-8, the two (all) Muslim Groups. The other Sub-Coalition would be 6-7, the two Sub-Saharan Groups. There are two more alternatives, 5-6 and 7-8, 5-7 and 6-8. If the Coalition is 1-2-4-5, the two Sub-Coalitions could be 1-4 and 2-5, 1-2 and 4-5, 1-5 and 2-4. There can be GEOGRAPHICAL PROXIMITY in the SUBCOALITIONS but it is NOT NECESSARY.
Regions, Subgroups, Groups, Subcoalitions, Coalitions, 10+2 Council add some STRUCTURE in WORLD AFFAIRS. They make them more ORDERLY and ORGANIZED. They assist COOPERATION and COORDINATION. We must emphasize that AntiNWO STRONGLY OPPOSES GLOBAL GOVERNMENT which is unnecessary and harmful. Unlike NWO, AntiNWO supports POWER to NATIONS. SUPRANATIONAL ENTITIES will have the MINIMUM POWER required for their proper functioning.