Ranking List Selection

In the example presented in "Very challenging game", China's selected Groups are M3 and R4. The five Groups that North America has selected are A2, R4, R1, E1, A3. For Northern and Eastern Europe, the chosen Groups are R1, E1, M1, M2, M3. Where is the overlapping? What Groups are common in the Coalitions? These are four Groups, M3, R4, E1, R1. What will the Coalitions be if we take them out?

China's will be left with no Groups. In North America's there would be A2, A3. In Northern and Eastern Europe's there will be M1, M2. Since no other Coalitions request these Groups, they could be granted. What about the common Groups that were taken out? Which Coalition will get them? There is another process that can be followed instead of the Decision Makers' Pick in Rounds (DMPR). It is based on a similar principle but it is different.

Each leader will submit a list with some (or all) of the other Groups ranked in order. The Group will go to the Coalition where it is ranked higher. M3, R4, E1, R1 were the four common Groups that were taken out. M3 is first choice for C and fifth for E2. So it will be granted to C. China has one grant (or pick) and the other two have zero. The two other grants will go to A1 and E2.

R4 is in second place in A1's list and in sixth place in E2's list. It is second in China's but China already has a grant. So R4 will be granted to A1. The next grant will go to E2. There are two common Groups left E1 and R1. R1 is in first place and E1 in second place, in E2's list. So E2 will get R1. Olny E1 is left from the common Groups. It is in China's fifth, A1's fourth and E2's second place. Each leader (C, A1, E2) has one grant or pick. So E1 will go to E2.

Still the Coalitions are not complete. China has only M3. One more Group is needed. A1 has A2, A3 and R4. Two more Groups are needed. E2 has M1, M2, R1, E1. There is only one Group left. Leaders will go down their list to find Groups to add. Groups that are already in Coalitions can't be used. Going down China's list, the next available Group is R2. R1, M2, E1 are already in E2's Coalition.

In A1's list, the next available Groups are S4 and R3. M2 and M1 are in E2's Coalition. In E2's list, the next available Group is S2. R4 and A2 are in A1's list. There will be four Groups added R2, S4, R3, S2. It happens that there is no overlapping. There are no common Groups. If there were common Groups, the process that was explained above would be repeated. We will call the process Ranking List Seletcion (RLS).

So the final Coalitions will be C-M3-R2, A1-A2-A3-R3-R4-S4, E2-E1-M1-M2-R1-S2. There are three more Groups left. These will be in the fourth Coalition I-S1-S3. The RLS process is easier and faster than the DMPR. All the leaders have to do is SUBMIT a LIST with their PREFERENCES ranked. After that, they do not have to do anything and can't do anything. After they submit the list, it will be over.

Still, there is a lot of strategic thinking similar to what was explained in DMPR. The leaders will try to guess the lists of the other two or three "players" and make their list in such a way that the outcome will be the most favorable to them. The two processes are not only similar in the principle used but are also very similar in the strategic thinking that is needed. Game theory deals with this kind of issues.

Another choice the leaders will have to make is which process to use, DMPR of RLS. In DMPR, after every round, the strategy of the "players" changes. Every round is a new game. For China (and India) there will be only two rounds. But for A1 and E2, there will be five rounds. DMPR has a lot more suspense and excitement because after each round, leaders may discuss the new strategy with the Groups that are close to them and ranked high on their list.

DMPR will take much longer, many hours or even days if the "players" request a lot of time to consider thoroughly their stratedy between the rounds. With RLS, after the lists with rankings are submitted, the result will be given in a few minutes. If a programmed commercial or custom made software is used, the result will be available in seconds. Both processes are very good and highly recommended by AntiNWO.

There are only two options for India a) leader b) non participant. If India cancels the trade deal with EU and renounces NWO's plan, it will be a leader. If not, it will not participate at all. India's participation will make the "game" even more complicated. "Players" will have to guess the actions of three, not just two other players. In chess, the player needs to guess the movements of one other player only.

If India does not participate, it may be easier if two Groups are assigned to its Coalition and finish with that. It will be two Groups that the three leaders (C, A1, E2) do not want in their Coalitions and are ranked very low in their list. In that way, there will be twelve Groups left (without the leaders) to be arranged in three Coalitions. The processes described will be followed but with less Groups.

One idea is to place India with Western European Group E1 and Southern American A3. E1 will certainly not participate because Western Europe is the main supporter of NWO's plan. A3 must cancel EU - Mercosur trade deal in order to participate. If they do not cancel, they will not participate either. So leaders could put all three I-E1-A3 in a Coalition and forget about them.

Suppose that India cancels the agreement with EU and renounces NWO's highly defective plan from the Dark Ages that has failed enormously. Below is the leaders' selection list with India. The only difference to the one presented in "Very challenging game" is that India's list is added. The other three remain the same. What has been explained so far can be applied to that list as well.

If India is among the leaders, it can choose E1 in its Coalition. In order to be in the leaders or even participate in the decision making, India must cancel EU - India trade deal. So first they cancel the deal and then, if they want, they can select E1 and have all the free trade they want. India must act fast because the other leaders will not wait for very long. Cancelation of EU - India deal must happen soon.

Regardless of the strategy that the leaders will follow, they will have to figure out the outcome of DMPR or RLS process and compare it to the one they have on the table, after the negotiations with the other leaders. If the one on the table seems better, they may stop there and not go on with DMPR or LRS. If their estimation of DMPR/RLS outcome seems better or if they feel lucky, they will go for DMPR or RLS.