Coalitions of countries
Coalitions of countries
In NWO's ridiculous plan, there are four Unions, European, American, Asian, African. In AntiNWO's plan there are four Coalitions. The Final Arrangement of Groups in Coalitions will be made in the future. AntiNWO has two Groupings that work very well on forming Coalitions. Grouping A has 10+2=12 Groups and Grouping B 16+2=18 Groups. One of the two must be chosen ASAP. However, AntiNWO has another proposal (plan)!
It has some disadvantages but is the MOST FLEXIBLE of all and more SUITABLE to RELATIONS between COUNTRIES. AntiNWO has had that proposal (plan) for years but has not presented it because although ACCEPTABLE, it is not preferable for reasons that will be explained. It was only mentioned briefly in some of the first articles. It is a very - very SIMPLE PROPOSAL. There will be FOUR COALITIONS of COUNTRIES WITHOUT any GROUPS.
Each Coalition will have roughly ONE FOURTH or 25% of the WORLD's POPULATION. With current population, each Coalition will have roughly TWO BILLION PEOPLE. That is the requirement. So countries can be added to Coalitions until they reach one fourth of the world's population. After that, no more countries can be added. When a Coalition reaches the 25% limit, it will be full.
There will be an acceptable range because it may be difficult to have all four Coalitions with exactly 25% of the world's population. In Coalitions of Groups, the suggested acceptable range is ±2%. However it could be ±2,5% or ±3%. In Coalitions of Countries, the acceptable range should be lower than in Coalitions of Groups. Perhaps it can be ±0,5%. If this is not possible, ±1% may be acceptable. It should not be above ±1,5%.
AntiNWO supports POWER to NATIONS. Coalitions of Countries should be AntiNWO's most preferable proposal (plan). However it is not because although it has advantages, it has disadvantages as well. Cooperation works well when there is spatial proximity. In both AntiNWO's Groupings, there is spatial proximity because it is a requirement for the Groups. Spatial proximity is not a requirment for Coalitions.
Some people in USA and China have Cold War mentality and prefer a two-sided world. If leadership is based on military strength, the two leaders should be USA and Russia. If leadership is based on the size of the economy, the two "leaders" should be China and India because in the future India will be the world's second largest economy. It is not in favor of USA to have two sides.
They should prefer four sides because with two sides they will be in China's or India's side, if leadership is based on the size of the economy. In a way, the four Coalitions of Countries will be four sides or parts. AntiNWO views the world as 10+2=12 twelve or 16+2=18 eighteen parts, not as four (4) parts. AntiNWO supports decentralization. Having four (4) parts is more centralized than having twelve (12) or eighteen (18) parts.
It is like in NWO's plan with the four Unions. Unlike in NWO's plan, the four Coalitions will have roughly equal population. Also relations will be much looser compared to those in NWO's four Unions. Close cooperation will be inside the Groups that will have spatial proximity. In Coalitions of Countries, spatial proximity is not required but it will occur because there will be many countries next to each other in the Coalitions.
A Coalition of Countries will not be like the Unions in NWO's plan or the Groups in AntiNWO's. Groups will decide how close relations between the countries will be. If a Group wants, it can have as close relations as EU. AntiNWO's economic and organizational model is different than EU's which is NWO's model. However, it is optional for Groups to use it. In Coalitions of Countries, relations will be much looser compared to Unions and Groups.
There can be NO GROUPS (or Unions) in Coalitions of Countries. There can be Subcoalitions but Subcoalitions are not Groups (or Unions). If Groups are desired, one of AntiNWO's two Groupings must be chosen. If decision makers want their countries to have close cooperation with some other countries, they should choose Coalitions of Groups and one of AntiNWO's two Groupings because they work well on forming Coalition.
Other groupings will be presented that do not work so well on forming Coalitions. However they are possible under certain conditions. These are also alternatives but they do not allow time for relations between Groups to develop. The Initial Arrangement must be the Final. Or there is not much flexibility to modify the Initial Arrangement. These will be explained in another article.
A very big problem with Coalitions of Countries is EU. It will have to be TERMINATED. EU countries could be in the same or in different Coalitions. It is already very difficult to break up EU into two parts as in AntiNWO's two Groupings. It will be even more difficult to entirely dismantle EU. This will be a main obstacle in having Coalitions of Countries. EU is a big problem in all AntiNWO's plans but it is even bigger in Coalitions of Countries.
NWO's plan is Western European. EU is a Western European supranational entity. Three quarters (75%) of EU's population is in Western Europe. Until 2004, there were only Western European countries in EU, except Greece (Hellas) which was a big anomaly. It is much easier to reverse course to 2004 (or 1995) and have a Western European Group than having a big Coalition in which Western Europe will participate.
Western Europe's population is a little less than 5% of the world's. Each Coalition will have roughly 25%. So Western Europe will be one fifth (1/5) of the Coalition, in terms of population. It may be hard to persuade them to accept it. It will be easier to make them accept a Western European Group instead of EU. As a matter of fact, they are ready for that alternative, even if they still try to sustain EU and NWO's plan.
NWO's fanatics in Western Europe want even closer relations in EU, more integration and more common policies. These is all NWO nonsense. The best thing is to let them have their own Group, Western European and do whatever they want inside that. Western Europe is one twentieth of the world (1/20) in terms of population. They can try all sorts of crazy things in Western European Group but the other 95% of the world will function properly.
Western Europe is a big global problem because it is controled by NWO. NWO is a bad disease that started in Western Europe a thousand years ago. From Western Europe it spread to other parts of the world. NWO has done endless horrible things in the past millenium and has caused many problems to Europe and the world. Western Europeans are responsible for allowing the disease to develop and spread. They are obligated to get rid of NWO.