AntiNWO's fine tuning

It is certain that NWO's insane plan and EU disaster are finished. Support for AntiNWO's far superior plan is mind blowing, nine out of ten prefer it. If instead of 90-10, it was 55-45 or even 60-40, there could be a chance for a turnaround. It is impossible to turnaround a 90% support that AntiNWO's outstanding plan has. Most likely, support will increase even more. So is it over? It is over in terms of the plan that will be implemented. It will definitely be AntiNWO's masterpiece.

What we do not know is the timing. NWO's monsters could cause a delay but this will have a high cost. Conspirators and traitors will go to jail and all their fortune will be confiscated. NWO's plan is total madness, a big disaster. AntiNWO fixed everything that was possible in that malfunctioning plan and created an outstanding plan that is getting huge support all over the world. AntiNWO's compromise plan gives broadly some general directions. Still there are a lot of details to be settled.

There is a lot of room for fine tuning, minor adjustments but there is no room for major changes. Fine tuning can be done in various areas of the compromise plan. First of all, fine tuning can be done in grouping. There have to be the 10+2 groups mentioned; 1) North America 2) South and Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe 5) Arab countries 6) North Sub-Saharan Africa 7) South Sub-Saharan Africa 8) Turkiye-Iran-Afghanistan-Pakistan 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia - Oceania 11) India 12) China.

There are alternatives for each group's composition. For some groups there are many alternatives while for others fewer. This is due to geography. Two oceans seperate North and Central - South America from the rest of the world. So any swaps would have to be made between the two groups, North American Group 1 and South-Central American Group 2.

There is not much room for fine tuning in terms of grouping. Canada, USA and Mexico would have to be in Group 1. The only thing that could be done is add some countries in Caribbean. Cuba is one possibility. On the contrary, there is a lot of room for fine tuning in some other groups, again due to geographic conditions. Europe and Asia are in reality one continent, Eurasia. Africa is separated by the man made Suez Canal.

The two Sub - Saharan groups 6 and 7 have to be separately from North Africa which is Arab and very different. But some countries like Sudan, Somalia, Djibouti could be in Group 5. In terms of population there is room for that because Subsaharan Africa has 1 billion inhabitants and according to some sources more than that. That could influence composition in Group 8.

Turkiye, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan will constitute Group 8. Also Arab countries could be with Group 8, provided that the population of the two groups is roughly the same. Turkiye's participation in Group 8, settles the eastern side of Eastern European Group 4. It will be Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan that will participate. There is uncertainty about Israel.

The western side of Group 4 remains unsettled. Some countries in between could go on either side; Italy, Austria, Czech Republic, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Finland. As the situation is currently, it will be either Italy or German Wannabes (Czech Republic, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia) that will participate in Group 4. If neither side pledges to join till 2055, something extremely unlikely, German Wannabes will participate because they are Eastern European and mainly Slavic countries.

Not only NWO's grouping is a total disaster but also EU's organizational model is a big failure. NWO plans to use it in the other three pseudo-continental unions, American, African, Asian. AntiNWO designed an alternative, far superior, organizational model for groups which is expected to be a huge success and the standard for most groups. There is also a lot of room for fine tuning in this model.

The model includes features like trading partners, subgroups and cozy regions. There is fine tuning regarding forming subgroups and regions. Also the time countries will participate in the groups is something to be settled. Another issue is if participating countries will be members or trading partners. Trading partners can become members but also the opposite is possible, members could become trading partners.

In addition to full membership, trading partner status is an option which is semi-participation. Trading partners have similar trading privileges with full members but are not part of the group's organization model, economic plan and decision making. They are independent countries that only have trading privileges similar to members. Perhaps another status could be added like for example Class B member.

Actually more categories can exist like Class C, D etc. It shouldn't get too complicated though. The simpler it is the better. It shouldn't get anymore complex if it is not necessary and worth it. Although many categories are possible, two are the maximum recommended for members, in addition to trading partners which are not members in the group. Preferably there should be only one member category, as described.

Further division inside the groups with subgroups and regions is optional. If this option is chosen, there will be a lot of room for fine tuning regarding subgroups' and regions' composition and the degree of autonomy these will have. Also a lot of room for fine tuning is in the procedures followed regarding the creation of a group. Some general directions were given regarding Group 4. Something similar could be done in any group.

Broadly, the only requirement for the participating countries is to have a minister or a deputy minister designated exclusively for the group affairs. People working for the Group will be spread in all countries and employed by these ministries. There are many options regarding capitals. They could be in regions, subgroups, Groups or not at all.

There are quite a few options for decision making. The Group's Parliament (like Europarliament) will be created by the national parliaments. Some decisions will be made in the Ministers Council and others in the Group's Parliament. Also there are various ways and different degrees of proportionality. Some decisions may require majority, others two thirds and a few to be taken unanimously.

The organizational model will be unique for each group, according to the special circumstances found in each group. Also there will be a unique economic plan of rapid development in each group. AntiNWO will assist Groups with both. The broad directions for the economic plans will be similar to those in Group 4 but there is a lot of work to be done.

Groups will also establish relations with other groups. There will be several agreements among groups. Some groups will be very close. EU fanatics should keep in mind that separation will not be alienation. The two European groups could get very close with the right agreements. Of course this is an option, it is not mandatory and the same holds for any two groups.

Although the general guidelines are given in Anti - NWO's compromise solution, there is really very much that could be done in terms of the details. There is a lot of work needed in the fine tuning regarding several aspects of the plan. What was mentioned above were only the main points. There are more aspects and more details that require fine tuning. Fine tuning is not trivial but a lot of work and very important.