Are groups useful?
Are groups useful?
Participation in EU has been very harmful for many countries. Probably the most notable case is Hellas. Furthermore, at least Italy, Spain, Portugal and most Eastern European countries are also hurt. Usually damage is greater in countries that have been members longer time. Length of membership is not the only factor though. If damage depended only on length of participation, damage would have been much greater in Italy than in Greece, which is not the case.
Perhaps productivity deficit is also another factor. This could be somewhat corrected with price level differences. Lower productivity is a disadvantage while lower price level an advantage. Length of problematic EU participation is definitely an important factor. That is why Eastern European countries are not so much damaged like Hellas (Greece). They all became members in or after 2004 while Hellas joined EU in 1981.
Productivity and price levels have been examined in previous articles. Here we want to examine a different issue. If participation in EU was UNDOUBTEDLY HARMFUL for many countries, why is Anti - NWO suggesting Groups in the compromise plan? There are some reasons. We need to remember NWO's catastrophic plan. According to that insanity, four continental groups would be made.
Asian, American and African Union would have the same organizational model like EU's which is extremely malfunctioning. The four continental Unions would be under a global government controlled by NWO which would exploit, suppress, deceive people and impose on them their will and beliefs via propaganda and brain washing. It would be NWO's global Dictatorship.
NWO is not real elite but a pseudoelite. They have risen conspiratorially and misplaced real elite. Real elite should have been in many positions that NWO maniacs hold. So, real elite has sided with Anti - NWO. There is no way that pseudoelite will ever win real elite. Real elite will prevail but prevalence may be hard and turbulent.
To avoid all these, Anti - NWO's real elite made several corrections in NWO's catastrophic plan. Almost all problems have been corrected. Grouping is different. There are ten relatively homogeneous groups that have approximately equal population. To these China and India are added. Instead of a global government, there is a global coordinating body, the 10+2 Council that deals with global matters only.
This is Anti - NWO's compromise plan. It is not their best preference since real elite also created a prevalence plan that NWO will never accept. For that plan to materialize, Anti - NWO will have to prevail which will be hard and turbulent. So, one reason Anti - NWO proposes Groups is because NWO's disastrous plan had grouping. It is based on NWO's plan, where all the necessary corrections were made.
Anti - NWO's real elite made several corrections in EU's catastrophic organizational model, the one NWO wanted to impose in all other three continental groups, American, Asian, African. It is a whole different mentality and is expected to be the norm for most other groups. Each group should make the appropriate adjustments, according to the specific conditions.
Participation in EU was definitely harmful for many countries. Anti - NWO's organizational model for groups will not be harmful. It is very flexible and every group could make the required adjustments. Countries will have much more autonomy, compared to EU's model. Groups will only deal with group matters, mainly economic cooperation and will not interfere in each country like EU does.
Like all things in life and politics, participating in a group has pros and cons. Anti - NWO's real elite tried to maximize pros and minimize cons, so that the net effect will be positive. This is done mainly with Anti - NWO's organizational model but also with a different grouping. EU's model is a disaster. Cons are more than pros and the net result is very negative for most countries.
There was another perceived problem that s EU's surrounding countries faced. When all the rest have grouped, those that are not in a group, believe to have a disadvantage. That is why so many countries wanted to be in EU. So this is another reason for groups. Evidence does not show to be a real disadvantage. Norway and Switzerland are doing very well, although they are not EU members.
Finally, groups are better organization for the world. Instead of having almost two hundred countries, these are grouped in 10+2 groups. What is the ideal number of groups? That question contemplated Anti - NWO's real elite. In NWO's catastrophic plan, there are four groups. Probably 10 + 2 is the ideal number. Twelve people can fit around a conference table.
Anti - NWO's plan is very flexible. It has a provision for more or less. There is an option for four coalitions of Groups with approximately two billion people each, with today's population. There are also options for subgroups. Each group can have as many subgroups as they desire. So the 10+2 groups could be aggregated into four coalitions or expanded to many more than 10 + 2 subgroups.
Groups can choose how much autonomy subgroups will have. Both subgroups and coalitions of groups are optional. They do not have to happen but could happen. Anti - NWO's real elite has created a great compromise plan. All the problems that could be corrected were corrected. It is very flexible and adaptive. It is not perfect but as good as it can get.
Details can be worked out. Groups don't have to proceed with all members from start but with a core. For Group 4, there were a few options presented. As it looks right now, most likely Italy will participate in Group 4 and Poland, Czech Republic, Baltic countries will be Germany's eastern Lebensraum in Group 3. Also some Arab countries could be with Iran - Afghanistan - Pakistan. Similar fine tuning can be done in all groups.
NWO created a global chaos and very many problems all over the world. Anti - NWO has corrected almost all, if not all the problems with the compromise plan. NWO's failure is collosal, monumental. NWO must step aside and let Anti - NWO implement the plan that has created which is much much better than NWO's catastrophic plan. All the world prefers Anti - NWO's plan from NWO's catastrophic plan.
It is only some NWO fanatics that are creating big problems and refuse to compromise and accept a plan that corrects most, if not all of the problems. You know who these maniacs are. They are dinosaurs and major global threats. Show them the exit door. Send them to their home or to prison so that they can't be an obstacle anymore for Anti - NWO's almost perfect compromise plan.