Best and feasible approaches

When Eastern European countries separate from Western in EU, Western European Group 3 will be formed. There are only three countries that need to be added in the future as members or trading partners; UK, Norway, Switzerland. The formation of Eastern European Group 4 is a little more complex than that. In the previous article, a process for forming Eastern European Group 4 was presented.

This is the best way, the one AntiNWO recommends. The problem is that NWO has placed puppet governments in many European countries. NWO fanatics in Eastern Europe, like Mitsotakis and Tusk, refuse to exit EU and undermine EU's authority and prestige for its remaining time. They fanatically insist on a plan that has failed tremendously and are an obstacle in following the best process for forming the two European Groups.

Nevertheless, there are alternative ways of doing this. We can't present all of them because there are many but we will present some. What matters is that in the end, the two European Groups are formed as described in AntiNWO's plan. If the best approaches are followed, it would be great. If not, any approaches are good, as long as the result is the two European Groups that are in AntiNWO's plan.

Eastern European countries could start preparing Subgroup A of Eastern European Group 4 while they are in EU. They could make an informal group and start planning their next steps. The problem is that there are NWO's puppets in many countries that are not willing to follow AntiNWO's plan. They frantically insist on a total failure, NWO's plan and EU. If they were willing to follow AntiNWO's plan, they would be willing to exit EU.

NWO's puppets can only delay the implementation of AntiNWO's plan which is people's choice and contains what people want. Eventually people will vote in AntiNWO politicians and political parties that take greatly into consideration their preferences. The delay caused by NWO's puppets could have significant consequences on the formation process of Eastern European Group 4.

AntiNWO allows appropriate transitional time for the Eastern European countries that will separate from Western in EU. Matters will remain as they were in EU. They will form a temporary group which will be entirely autonomous and operate independently of CIS. Sometime in the future, the two autonomous groups will merge and become two relatively autonomous Subgroups of Eastern European Group 4.

If NWO's fanatics cause considerable delay in the implementation of AntiNWO's plan, this lost time will have to be made up. Modifications will have to be made. In AntiNWO's best approach, there is no hurry for the merger of the two Subgroups and there is also adequate transitional time for the countries that will exit EU. But if NWO causes a big delay, procedures will have to be rushed through in order to make up for the lost time.

Western European countries have 75% of the population in EU (Table A Appendix 24). So it is reasonable that Eastern European countries exit because they have only one fourth (25%) of the population. In this way, Western European Group could be considered the continuation of EU. Unfortunately, there are NWO fanatics in Eastern Europe, like Mitsotakis and Tusk that refuse to follow the right way and exit EU. Another approach may be needed.

Similar people can understand each other better. They can communicate and cooperate better. Western European voters correctly want to be with similar people. They rightly prefer to separate Western Europe from Eastern because their group becomes more homogeneous. Additionally, they prefer two subgroups, Southern A and Northern B. This subdivision adds even more homogeneity. Perhaps, in Western Europe, support for two separate European Groups is bigger compared to Eastern.

In Eastern Europe, people have been brainwashed that EU participation is the solution to all their problems and this is the way to reach the per capita income of Western European countries. Obviously, people want solutions to all their problems and considerable increase of their income. But these are big lies. When people realize that they have been deceived by NWO - EU propaganda, they will want two separate European Groups.

This may take some time. It may be faster to replace NWO governments with AntiNWO in Western Europe because people already support two separate Groups in Europe and two Subgroups in Western European Group. AntiNWO governments will take their countries out of EU in order to form Western European Group. This is not the best way but it may be the fastest way.

As it can be seen in Table B of Appendix 24, EU countries have 62% of the population in Subgroup A of Eastern European Group 4. It is reasonable that they form a temporary group and non EU countries (38% of population) are gradually added. But this requires that Eastern European countries exit from EU. Currently, NWO puppet governments are not willing to do that.

EU countries have only 26% of the population in Eastern European Group 4 while Subgroup B (CIS) has 58%. An alternative approach would be if non EU countries of Subgroup A join Subgroup B which is already a Group, Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). These countries are; Ukraine, Israel, Serbia, Bosnia, Albania, Moldova, N. Macedonia, Montenegro.

Almost all, except Israel, are candidates to become EU members. It would be a mistake if they joined EU. This is entirely meaningless because it is absolutely certain that in the end, Western European countries will be in a different Group, Western European. It is reasonable that they join CIS since it is absolutely certain that in the end they will be in the same Group, Eastern European.

Suppose some of these countries join EU. It will not be a big problem although it is certainly meaningless. The only difference would be that more countries will exit EU to form Subgroup A of Eastern European Group. And if they refuse to exit, Western European countries will exit EU to form Western European Group 3 because Western European voters already support two separate Groups in Europe, Western and Eastern.

Bottom line is that there are many ways to achieve the final goal, the two European Groups as described in AntiNWO's plan. There the best approaches, the ones that AntiNWO recommends. But the best approaches may not be feasible because NWO fanatics are obsessed with a plan that has failed enormously. Other approaches may be followed as long as the final goal is reached, the two European Groups in AntiNWO's plan.