Coalitions' formation

In NWO's ridiculous plan, there are four Unions (Groups), European, African, Asian, American. If there are four Groups, they should be roughly EQUAL in terms of POPULATION. This is COMMON SENSE. Someone does not need knowledge of politics or organizational theory to understand it. NWO's vicious cabal are highly dysfunctional people that support a highly malfunctioning plan.

AntiNWO's COALITIONS of Groups or Mega-Groups have roughly EQUAL POPULATION, two billion people each. We should emphasize that COALITIONS are OPTIONAL in AntiNWO's magnificent plan. The pros and cons should be examined carefully and then decide. Let's assume that there will be Coalitions. We should elaborate a little more on how these Coalitions can be formed.

Since we will show many possible alternatives for Coalitions, we will use numbers for Groups. It is easier and takes less space. AntiNWO's Groups are; 1) North America 2) South & Central America 3) Western Europe 4) Eastern Europe 5) Arab Group 6) Northern Subsaharan Africa 7) Southern Subsaharan Africa 8) Southwestern Asia 9) Northeastern Asia 10) Southeastern Asia & Oceania 11) India 12) China.

The number of combinations is not infinite but very large. There are ten (10) combinations for China's Coalition; 12-1, 12-2, 12-3, 12-4, 12-5, 12-6, 12-7, 12-8, 12-9, 12-10. To each one of these, there are nine (9) combinations for India's Coalition. If we take the first one (12-1), the combinations are; 11-2, 11-3, 11-4, 11-5, 11-6, 11-7, 11-8, 11-9, 11-10. So there are 10 X 9 = 90 ninety combinations for China's and India's Coalitions.

To each one of these combinations, there are many ways to have two Coalitions of four with the eight Groups that are left. According to internet sources, there are thirty five (35) ways to have two groups of four with eight objects. If this is correct, the number of all possible COMBINATIONS for the four COALITIONS would be 90 X 35 = 3.150 THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED and FIFTY!

There must be some reasoning followed in forming Coalitions. According to an opinion, the four Coalitions should have a mix of high, medium and low income Groups. If this reasoning is followed, North America and Western Europe should not be in the same Group because they are the first and second place in terms of per capita income. Eastern Europe and Northeastern Asia follow.

Groups are in all continents; America 1-2, Europe 3-4, Africa and Asia 5, Africa 6-7, Asia & Oceania 8-9-10-11-12. America, Europe, Africa have two while Asia and Oceania have five. Arab Group is in Africa and Asia. Coalitions can have one Group from each continent. In China's and India's Coalition it will not be possible to do that since there would be two Groups instead of four.

A mix from all continents was shown in Example D of previous article; 1-4-7-9, 2-3-6-10, 11-5, 12-8. Another alternative is; 1-3-6-8, 2-4-7-9, 11-10, 12-5. The continental mix reasoning can also be combined with the per capita income mix reasoning. There are only two combinations for American and European Groups a) 1-3, 2-4 b) 1-4, 2-3. If the income mix reasoning is also followed, the second alternative should be chosen.

As matters stand currently, relations between Western and Eastern European Group will be very distant or non-existent. This can only change if Western Europe supports and assists the formation of a temporary independent Group from Eastern European EU countries. This will merge with CIS in order to create Eastern European Group.

So unless there is a change in Western Europe's stance in this matter, WESTERN and EASTERN EUROPEAN Group will have very distant or non existent relations and can NOT BE in the SAME COALITION. As it was mentioned in the previous article, WESTERN EUROPE should NOT be in the SAME COALITION with North America. They are erroneously presumed to be allies but in reality they are ECONOMIC COMPETITORS.

Most likely, a certain process will be followed in forming Coalitions that may incorporate some of the a reasoning already mentioned. As it has been explained, it seems that North America, South and Central America, Eastern Europe (not NWO's puppets) and Arab Group are the biggest supporters of AntiNWO's spectacular plan. China also seems to support and India could be persuaded.

In Example C of previous article the Coalitions were; 1-2-4-5, 3-8-6-7, 12-9, 11-10. The biggest supporters of AntiNWO's plan were placed in the same Coalition. This is one way this can be done. But there is another way. The SUPPORTERS of AntiNWO's superb plan can SET the COALITIONS the WAY they LIKE them and opponents will have to accept that. LEADERS SAY and FOLLOWERS OBEY!

Any person in his/her right mind can understand the superiority of AntiNWO's plan. It is certain that eventually it will prevail. The biggest supporters of AntiNWO's plan are the leaders, while the opponents are the laggards. The leaders will decide how they want Coalitions to be, assuming that there are Coalitions. Perhaps the combination shown in Example C is not how leaders want the Coalitions to be.

The biggest opponents of AntiNWO's plan are the the biggest supporters of NWO's plan. These are Western Europe's NWO governments which insist on a failed plan that has caused a lot of trouble all over the world and mostly in Europe. We should differentiate between Western European governments and the voters. Western European citizens want to have a separate Group without any Eastern European countries. Politicians are acting against the voters' will.

Southwestern Asian Group 8 also seems to be in the wrong direction, mostly because of Turkiye. A very strange thing about Turkiye is that they support NWO's plan but they do not accept it as it is and want to change it. They want something that is not in NWO's plan and very difficult to happen. They want to be in European Union, while in NWO's plan Turkiye is specifically in Asian Union.

The rest of the Groups do not oppose AntiNWO's plan but do not actively and enthusiastically support it. They certainly prefer it than NWO's disastrous plan but have a passive stance. There will be a price that they will have to pay, a negative consequence. If they compare the two plans, they should have no doubt which plan will eventually prevail. If they want to participate in the decision making, they should get involved.

Western European NWO governments are a major global problem. They are only delaying AntiNWO's superb plan from being implemented by insisting on an extremely defective plan that has failed enormously. They are harmful most of all to Western Europe. Not only they will be isolated but Western Europe could end up in the worst possible for them Coalition.

Western European voters should understand that and GET RID of NWO GOVERNMENTS the SOONEST POSSIBLE. Anyone can understand which plan will prevail. It will remain for very long time, most likely for centuries. We can't predict what will happen after many centuries. With these governments, WESTERN EUROPE will have the WORST POSSIBLE PLACEMENT in the FUTURE WORLD AFFAIRS for CENTURIES.