Compromise or prevail?

Compromise or prevail?

A strange and critical global situation has developed lately, especially after the attack at Crocus Center in Moscow. There are some possible developments. Basically there are two alternatives and each one has various paths. It has to do with NWO's willingness to compromise. Based on that, two different routes could be taken a) the route of NWO's compromise b) the route of NWO's non compromise. Both end at the same destination.

It should be demanded by NWO to compromise. This means accepting Anti-NWO's grouping and other terms. In some groups there are alternative compositions. Crucial are compositions of Eastern European Group 4 and South Central Asia's Group 8. Their composition will affect the composition of neighboring groups 3 and 5 and possibly groups 6 and 7. There are 5 basic alternatives for groups 4 and 8 as shown in previous article.

Alternatives

  • 1   Group 4 ; 1 + A + C   Group 8 ; 2 + D
  • 2   Group 4 ; 1 + A + D   Group 8 ; 2 + C
  • 3   Group 4 ; 1 + B + C   Group 8 ; 2 + D
  • 4   Group 4 ; 1 + B + D   Group 8 ; 2 + C
  • 5   Group 4 ; 1 + C + D   Group 8 ; 2 + E

 

Areas

  • 1 Balkan countries Russia Belarus Ukraine Georgia Armenia
  • 2 Iran Afghanistan Pakistan
  • A Hungary Slovakia Czech Republic Poland Baltic countries
  • B Italy
  • C Turkey
  • D Caspian countries
  • E Iraq Syria Lebanon Jordan

The one that will be agreed will determine the course of action towards ISIS - K. In deciding which one to choose, ISIS - K's preference should be taken into consideration. It is possible that ISIS - K will eventually accept alternatives 1 (& 3), which is the original plan. It is not very likely that they will accept any other alternative but they should be contacted some how to find out their opinion.

ISIS - K is not the one that will decide but if an alternative is acceptable by ISIS - K, it will be with less trouble. If another alternative is chosen, one that ISIS - K does not want, they will resist it with their usual ways. In that case, eventually they will have to be eliminated. Lets assume that NWO agrees to compromise. NWO failed miserably and created a global chaos.

Anti-NWO compromise plan was designed by Anti-NWO to minimize problems and conflicts. So, it is Anti-NWO that must implement it, not NWO. The NWO governments will have to be replaced with Anti-NWO or at least non-NWO governments. What will happen if NWO does not show any willingness to compromise? In that case, they will be defeated.

ISIS - K will eventually realize that Weimar Triangle's or Western Europe's NWO played them big time. ISIS - K will eventually realize that NWO supports something they do not want, Asian Union. They may settle for alternative 1 (& 3), the original plan for Eastern European Group 4 and South Central Asia's Group 8. They will eventually realize that obstacles for this scenario are France, Germany, Poland, Czech Republic, Baltic countries.

So they will turn against them for two reasons a) to punish them for misleading then b) to persuade them to accept alternative 1. They have specific ways to retaliate and convince. Timing is very good for ISIS - K and bad for France and Germany. UEFA Euro 2024 will take place in many German cities from 14 June to 14 July. Olympic Games 2024 will take place in France, mostly Paris, from July 26 till August 11.

Generally, it is hard to prevent terrorist attacks and it is even harder in big athletic events like these. There could be much bigger terrorist attacks in France and Germany than the one in Moscow. What will be the implications of these? French and German citizens will realize that they are related with the war in Ukraine and their governments' policies.

The percentages for governing parties will plummet. In Germany there is a coalition but in France it is Macron's party that governs. The whole world will realize that NWO not only can not solve any problems but is creating many more and has caused a world chaos. So the world will turn their hopes to Anti-NWO, to solve their problems and prosper.

Anti-NWO will have two alternatives, compromise or prevail. If final victory is close, there won't be a need to seek a compromise with NWO. Anti - NWO has two plans. The one explained so far is the compromise plan. It is designed in a way to partially satisfy NWO in order to conciliate. In the prevalence plan, there is no need to satisfy NWO and it is a much better plan.

For that plan to happen, Anti - NWO must prevail. It is a more difficult road than that of compromise. Anti - NWO has not published yet the prevalence plan because at this point, all efforts are in compromising with NWO. Plus it needs some work. When the final victory is close, Anti - NWO will make their prevalence plan public. There are four different alternatives for international relations.

a) previous international relations b) Anti - NWO's prevalence plan c) Anti - NWO's compromise plan d) NWO's plan

NWO's disastrous plan will definitely not happen. It will be one of the two a) Anti-NWO's prevalence plan or b) Anti - NWO's compromise plan that will be implemented in the end. Whether it will be the one or the other, depends on NWO's willingness to compromise and how close Anti - NWO will be to final victory. NWO may seek to compromise at a later stage but if Anti - NWO is close to victory, it will decline it. The compromise solution is on the table right now but it may not be on the table later.

Scroll to Top