Defensive groups

We need to understand that NWO is continuation of World War II. Socialist centers of power tried to use Axis’s military might in order to establish a European and Global Socialist Dictatorship. Nazism like Fascism are in the Socialist umbrella of ideologies. Many later self-identifying social-democrats, like France’s Mitterrand, were Nazi supporters.   

Perhaps socialist centers of power had tried the same again in Napoleonian Wars and World War I. We need to draw comparisons between World War II and NWO. Main Allied Forces were USA, Britain and Russia (Soviet Union). This was a defensive alliance or grouping created to stop the Axis from establishing a European and Global Socialist Dictatorship.

In Britain and USA, there was a free market system. Probably they did not like very much the Soviets since they were communists. Britain and USA did not have the best relationships either. We should keep in mind that War of Independence in USA was against Britain but most colonists were of British descent. USA had entered World War I, in 1917, towards the end. Their very close cooperation in World War II, improved considerably relations.

After World War II, we had the division of Europe mainly (and the World) in spheres of influence. Eastern Europe was under the influence of the Soviets and Western Europe under the influence of USA and Britain. France’s participation in the victory was minimal and Vichy government that controlled a large part of France was pro-Nazi.

We are not going to examine if the post – World War II settlement was prudent or not. It was the consequence, not the goal which was to stop the Nazis and their allies from establishing a European and Global Socialist Dictatorship. Allied Forces were a group of countries that were trying to stop Hitler from conquering the World and post-World War II situation was an agreement among the winners or the War.

We have already examined how an anti – NWO international alliance can be formed among political parties, political organizations, economic organizations. What we have not examined is how an alliance can be made among countries. We need to remember what is NWO plan for Global Socialist Dictatorship. First a European Socialist Dictatorship, named European Union will be established.

After all, Axis’s main field of operations was Europe. NWO’s origins were in European Socialism. After EU experiment will have completed fine-tuning, the model will be applied to three more continental Socialist Unions, American, Asian, African. So they want to make four altogether continental Socialist Unions under a Global Socialist Dictatorship.

The relations among two countries are called bilateral, among three countries trilateral etc. In a group of many countries, we have multilateral situations. In European Union, the relations are multilateral. There are some valid arguments against multirateral relations. Opponents recognize some benefits but judge that shortcomings carry more weight. It is usually of matter of weighing pros and cons.

Nevertheless, grouping of countries can be a defensive strategy against NWO even if the only thing that keeps the group together is opposition to NWO plan. In addition to that, there can be some privileged economic and/or military relations. It is not necessary though to have any other type of relationship than common opposition to NWO plan.

Brexit was a historic anti-NWO event since according to NWO plan, Britain is in European Socialist Union. Britain did not have major economic problems because of EU participation but other important issues that resulted in Brexit. There are countries with huge economic problems because of their participation in EU. First in the list is Greece. A Grexit (Greece’s exit) could drag along other Balkan countries.

Italy has some serious economic problems that are very hard to fix while remaining in the EU. Spain and Portugal are likewise candidates for an exit. They do have some economic problems but also an interest and economic relations with South and Central America that can not be developed to the fullest while remaining in EU.

A group of countries does not have to be like EU, which according to our views is an example to avoid. Relations in a group can be loose and countries can maintain their independence. The British model of EU favored loose relationships. Perhaps an even looser than the British model can be applied. How countries envision groups could be the number one factor on the composition of defensive groups.