Double orientation a plus

A very important and non negotiable point in AntiNWO's plan is Europe's division in two parts. Originally, all Eastern European countries were included in Eastern European Group 4. Two small countries were added, Armenia and Georgia. They are in Asia but next to Europe-Asia border and Christian, while all the rest of the countries in the region are Muslim. Also Israel could be added.

Obviously Russia was included in Eastern European Group. It is an integral part of Eastern Europe. It has strong racial, historical, cultural, religious ties with Eastern European countries. RUSSIA can NEVER be SEPARATED from the rest of EASTERN EUROPE. Only very sick (mentally) people can plan and do such a horrible thing. It is insane to have Eastern European countries together with France, Germany, Holland, Denmark etc and not with Russia.

Almost all countries in Western Europe are Celtic and Germanic. The only exceptions are Italy, Austria and Finland. All Eastern European countries have considerable Slavic ancestry and a little Ural-Altaic. In the southern part, starting from Greece and all the way to Slovakia and southern Ukraine, there is significant  Greco-Thraco-Illyrian ancestry.

Initially Turkiye was included in Eastern European Group. They have a small part in Eastern Europe. Today's Turkiye was part of Byzantine Empire. Also they have requested membership in EU since 1987. Central Asian countries and Azerbaijan were placed in Group 8 with Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Central Asian countries are Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

Since Turkiye wanted to play an important role in the Muslim world, there was a modification in the original plan, a swap between Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan and Turkiye. This was something that Russia and Belarus welcomed because Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan are in Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) which is a successor entity of Soviet Union.

Under the guidance of Germany and France, Poland, Czech Republic and Baltic countries (German Wannabes) opposed their participation in Eastern European Group. So there was another modification, another swap between Italy and German Wannabes. For this to happen, Italy must decide to participate in Group 4. Otherwise, German Wannabes will because they are Eastern European and Slavic countries.

Italy is not Celtic or Germanic country. It is the only Latin country in Europe and the world. So it could be placed with Latin speaking countries in Subgroup A of Western European Group 3 or with Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries in Subgroup A of Group 4. Regardless if German Wannabes or Italy participate, Subgroup 4A will certainly include Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries and Ukraine.

Many of Subgroup 4A countries are currently in EU. Because of that, they have relations with Celtic and Germanic countries that are also in EU. Also many have good relations with USA. They may want to keep these good relations. The situation regarding foreign relations is a little different in Subgroup 4B which includes Russia, Belarus, Southern Caucasus and Central Asian countries. Southern Caucasus countries are Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan.

In Subgroup 4B, they have good relations with China and Turkiye - Iran which will be in Group 8. In Subgroup 4B, they may want to keep the good relations with the countries mentioned. So the two Subgroups of Group 4 have different orientation. Is that a problem? Not only this is not a problem but it something positive, a plus, an advantage for the Group.

The two Subgroups will have relative autonomy. Not only it is possible to have different orientation but also it is easy and something good. It would be done anyway because of geographic location. Subgroup 4A is on the western side of Group 4 while Subgroup 4B is on the eastern side. Western Europe and USA Canada are considered "the West". Eastern Europe is definitely not part of the West.

Only Italy is part of the West, if it ends up participating. Although not part of the West, Subgroup 4A can develop closer relations with the West, since it is on the western side of Group 4. On the other hand, Subgroup 4B can develop closer relations with the East (China, Iran, Turkiye etc), since it is on the eastern side. This is not a problematic situation but one where things fit very well together.

The two Subgroups of Group 4 will have relations between them. But all groups will develop relations with other Groups. So will Group 4. The fact that the two Subgroups have different orientation, makes it easier for Group 4 to have good relations with North American Group 1, Western European Group 3, Group 8 and China. India and China are treated like Groups.

Suppose that the two subgroups had the same orientation. Let's say that both were oriented towards Group 8 and China. Group 4 would have close relations with Group 8 and China but distant with Groups 1 and 3. If they were oriented towards North America and Western Europe, they would have close relations with them and distant with China and Turkiye - Iran.

Now they can have close relations with North America, Western Europe through Subgroup 4A and with China, Iran, Turkiye through Subgroup 4B. Obviously, they will have relations with other Groups as well. Some people have reservations for AntiNWO's plan because they erroneously believe that Group 4 will tilt towards China, Iran, Turkiye. These people have a Cold War mentality and have been left behind.

During Cold War, the world was divided in two alliances. In a way, it made sense to have two sides because they supported two different politicoeconomic systems, communism and mixed economy. Cold War ended in the late 80's. People with Cold War mentality still think of two opposing sides. AntiNWO thinks of many cooperating sides (Groups). Some Groups will have closer relations while others not so close.

Nevertheless, if some people insist on Cold War mentality, Eastern Europe must be on the same side with Russia. Or to phrase it differently, Russia and the rest of Eastern Europe must be together. That was the situation during Cold War and the Crusaders' plan. That is the one that should remain, if people want to have a Cold War mentality. Separating Russia from the rest of Eastern Europe is absurd.

It is also absurd to separate Greece (Hellas) from the rest of Eastern Europe. This happened during Cold War. There were reasons for that. Churchill was interested in Greece's long coastline since Britain was a naval power. Soviet Union was a land army power and Stalin was not interested much in Greece's long coastline. Also, communism in Eastern Europe was an important reason for many Greeks not wanting to be in Eastern Bloc.

There is no communism in Eastern Europe anymore. Greece, like Russia, is an integral part of Eastern Europe. All Balkan countries originate from Byzantine Empire but Greece has a very special relation with it. Byzantine Empire had very close relations with Kievan Russes. Russia, Belarus and Ukraine originate from them. Greece must be together with all Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries.

Separation is not alienation   EU’s racial deception   No European family   Two Europes   Hellenistic fusion in Byzantium   Matters get settled