Eastern Europe's decisions

In a previous article, we explained what a waste Europarliament is. The same job can be done with national Parliaments. This optional proposal is part of the decision making in Eastern Europe's organizational model. There is a whole chapter regarding this issue. The plan itself is more than 300 pages. This includes graphs, tables, appendixes.

The only requirement for participation in the Group is that countries have ministers or deputy ministers for the group's affairs. It is a totally different approach, compared to the failed EU model, much more flexible, not bureaucratic. Let's name this ministries EEC (Eastern European Commonwealth) ministries. All ministers will constitute EEC Ministers Council and they will meet regularly.

If there is a capital for Group 4, they will meet in the capital. If there is no capital, the will meet in rotation in the countries' capitals. It is possible that there will be regions in the group. According to one proposal, there will be capitals for the regions but none for the group. In that case, EEC Ministers Council will meet in rotation, in the regional capitals. On the contrary to EU, the model is very decentralized.

Personnel working for the Group's affairs will be spread in all countries and employed by the EEC Ministries. If there is as capital, there may be some coordinating bodies there but nothing compared to Brussel's massive bureaucracy. The total number of the employees working for the Group will be much much lower compared to EU. Also the ones in the capital's coordinating bodies will be only a small fraction of the total number.

How will decisions be made for the Group's affairs? A simple way is the EEC Ministers to vote and each country to have one vote. It could require just majority or more than that like two thirds of votes. If we have 26 countries, majority would require 14 and two thirds 18 votes. Another option would be if votes carry different weight. It could be according to population. So as shown in Appendix 2, Belarus would have 2.15% weight and Serbia 1.55%.

Or it could be degressive proportionality where smaller countries get higher percentages than their proportion. We could have a mix of both systems. In some decisions countries will have one vote each and in others proportional vote. It is possible to have a system similar to the one in USA where there are two bodies, Senate and House of Representatives. Each state has two senators. The number of representatives is proportional to the state's population.

In Eastern Europe, it will not be exactly like that but the idea will be the same. Instead of Senate, there will be the Council of EEC ministers where each country will have one vote. The equivalent of the House of Representatives will be the Eastern Europarliament that will be created from national Parliaments. There, the seats or votes will be proportional to the population.

For some decisions, each country will have one vote in EEC Ministers Council. Since it is only one vote, it can not be split. For other decisions, it could be some type or proportionality, strict of degressive. It is possible to set upper and lower limits. A country could not have a weight of more than 25% or 30% and lower than 1% or 2%. In EU, the lowest percentage is 0.85% for Cyprus, Malta and Luxemburg.

So a country's vote could be split as it was explained in the previous article. We need to clarify something that was not explained very thoroughly. The numbers of MPs in national parliaments are not proportional to populations. The number of MEPs in Europarliament are proportional to populations although it is degressive proportionality. The number of MPs in national Parliaments does not matter in order to create an Eastern Europarliament from them.

What matters is the percentage of MPs that vote in a certain way. In EU disaster Greece (Hellas), the number of MPs in national Parliament is 300. It could be any number because we calculate percentage. So if in an issue, 129 vote Yes and 171 vote No, we will get the percentage of the total. It is 129 divided by 300 and 171 divided by 300, or 43% and 57% respectively. Let's look at some more examples.

Ukraine has 9,59 % of total population. Let's say on a certain issue, the Parliament votes Yes 37% and No 63%. Ukraine has a weight of 0.0959. So, for Yes it will be counted 0.0959 multiplied by 0.37 and for No 0.0959 multiplied by 0.63. Hungary's percentage is 2.24%. Suppose the Parliament votes Yes 55% and No 45%. For Yes 0.55 will be multiplied by Hungary's weight 0.0224 and for No that weight will be multiplied by 0.45.

There are more in the chapter regarding decision making. None of the proposals is final. Anything in the plan can be modified. The EEC Ministers Council will decide which form of decision making they want to adopt. The ministers will be under the prime ministers or presidents. So it will be actually these that will make the decisions, although formally the EEC Ministers Council will.

It is very important that Group 4 will be formed very soon. Preparations need to start right away, as Western Europeans have already been preparing for Western European Union. The task for Eastern Europe is more difficult but the economic plan is ready and the organizational model is ready, provided by Anti-NWO's real elite. The model will be available for other groups, once it proves to be a success.

Puppets move only when puppeteers move them. Not everyone in Eastern Europe is a puppet though. Those that are not Western Europe's puppets, need to start preparations for Eastern European Group 4 tomorrow. Not only Eastern Europe but other regions in the planet have high hopes for that. If it proves to be a success, it will be the standard model for most other groups.