EU's continuation

In "European Groups' populations", it was explained that 80% of Western European Group's population is in EU and 75% of EU's population is in Western Europe. In terms of population, Western European Group could be considered continuation of EU but the same does not hold true for Eastern European Group. Population percentage is not the only factor that will determine continuation of EU in Western European Group.

Another factor is the way Western and Eastern European countries will be separated. There are three ways this can be done; a) Eastern European countries leave b) Western European countries leave c) EU splits into two parts. In the first two alternatives, it is very clear whether Western European Group can be considered continuation of EU.

We have been claiming that exit of Eastern European countries is the most reasonable way to separate Western from Eastern European countries in EU. This is because 75% of EU's population is in Western Europe while only 25% is in Eastern, as it was explained In "European Groups' populations" and shown in Appendix 24. It makes sense that the smallest percentage will exit. In that case, Western European Group can be considered continuation of EU.

When UK exited EU, all matters remained the same for the rest of the countries. EU remained the same and that included any agreements that were made. They were valid, even after UK left. Obviously, EU agreements were not valid for UK because it was no longer in EU. When UK exited, 13% of EU's population left. UK was one country while Eastern European countries in EU are thirteen.

Nevertheless, in terms of population there is not so big difference. UK's population is sixty seven million (67.026.292) while all thirteen Eastern European countries have one hundred and thirteen million (112.598.642) or 25% of EU's population. If they exit, 75% of the Group's population will remain. When UK was in EU, Eastern Europe's population was 22% instead of 25%. So almost 80% of EU's population was in Western Europe.

What is the maximum percentage of population that can exit in order for the remaining part be considered continuation of EU? There is no clear answer but certainly if more than half of the population exits, it can no longer be considered a continuation. So at least 51% has to remain and probably this may not be enough. Perhaps two thirds or more may be needed.

Suppose that Eastern European countries do not take the initiative to leave EU but Western European want to have a separate Group. In that case, Western European countries would have to exit. Could they be considered a continuation of EU? No because they would have left EU. Although they would have 75% of EU's population, they could not be considered a continuation of EU since they would have exited EU.

But Eastern European countries could not be considered a continuation of EU either because they would have only 25% of EU's population which is definitely not enough. They would certainly need at least 51% but it is questionable even if this percentage is adequate. So in that case, none of the two Groups can be considered continuation of EU and all agreements EU had made would not be valid.

The third way to separate Western from Eastern European countries in EU, is with a common decision to split the Group into two parts. In this case it is not as clear if Western European Group can be considered continuation of EU. Most likely, it can't but this third alternative is more in the grey area while in the two other alternatives it very clear whether Western European Group can be considered continuation of EU.

When UK exited EU, all matters remained as they were for the rest of the countries. There was no need for a decision to be made to keep matters as they were. Even though Western and Eastern European Group could not be considered a continuation of EU, they could decide to keep matters as they were (in EU) for some time, including agreements. But this will require a special decision.

There will be a transition period for the Eastern European countries that will leave EU. All matters will remain as they were in EU. So agreements could remain for the transition period, not because they would be valid but in order to have a smoother transition. After the transition period, Eastern European Group 4 will be formed and EU countries will be only 26% of the population. New agreements will have to be made and some of them are ready, with North America, China and other Groups or countries.

The situation will be different in Western European Group. EU countries will have 80% of Western European Group's population. Countries of Category C (not EU members) will be added at a later time. Suppose countries of Category A, EU members, decide to keep matters as they were in EU. When the rest of the countries will be added, there would be negotiations to change certain things.

But since EU members will have 80% of the population, they could have it their way. We should also mention that an option is to accept countries of Category C (not EU members) as trading partners. In Eastern European Group, EU countries will be only 26% of the Group's population. It will be much harder to have it their way. But AntiNWO has ready a much better organizational and economic Group model.

It is very possible that NWO governments in Western Europe will be replaced with AntiNWO governments. Eventually, AntiNWO governments will implement AntiNWO's model. So in Western Europe, the same could be done like in Eastern Europe. For a transitional period, things could remain as they were in EU to make the transition smoother but in the long run AntiNWO's economic and organizational Group model could be applied.

In the Group's internal matters, only members are involved. But in agreements, other parties are also involved. So even though the two European Groups may decide to honor EU's agreements, the other parties involved in the agreements may not accept it, if for whatever reasons they no longer think they are beneficial. The other parties may decide that the agreements are no longer valid, if the two Groups can't be considered continuation of EU.