Formation of Group 4

There have been a few scenarios presented in past articles regarding the formation of Eastern European Group 4. For some time, there were a few alternatives regarding the Group's composition. In the western part, Italy could participate instead of Poland - Czechia - Baltic countries. In the eastern part, Turkiye could participate instead of Central Asian countries - Azerbaijan.

AntiNWO finalized the European Groups. Italy will be in Western European Group and Turkiye in Group 8 with Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan. Although it would be very beneficial for Italy to participate in Eastern European Group, the truth is that it fits much better in Western European Group. With Italy, the Group is much more homogeneous, compared to what it would be with Poland - Czechia - Baltic countries. There will be even more homogeneity with the two Subgroups, Southern A and Northern B.

Since the composition of the two European Groups has been finalized, the formation process of Eastern European Group can be finalized. There will be two Subgroups, Western A and Eastern B. Eastern Subgroup will be Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), without Ukraine and Moldova. So Eastern Subgroup is ready as CIS. Turkiye's participation in Group 8 made much easier the process regarding Eastern European Group's formation.

CIS should prepare to become a relatively autonomous Subgroup of Eastern European Group. As it can be seen in Table B of Appendix 24, Category B are CIS countries which will form Subgroup B. In Western Subgroup Α, some countries are in EU while others are not. Category A1 are EU countries while Category A2 are non EU countries. The first step would be to separate Western European countries from Eastern in EU. This can be accomplished in three ways.

The best approach would be if Eastern European countries exited. Only in this way can Western European Group be considered a continuation of EU. Only in this way can EU have authority and prestige during its remaining time. There are two more ways Western and Eastern European countries can separate. Western European countries could exit or there could be a decision to split the Group into two parts.

The Eastern European countries that will exit EU will form a temporary Group, which will prepare to become a relatively independent Subgroup of Eastern European Group 4. For a transition period, matters will remain as the were in EU. Gradually, the countries that are not in EU will be accepted in the Group. As it can be seen in Table B of Appendix 24, these countries are; Ukraine, Israel, Serbia, Bosnia, Albania, Moldova, N. Macedonia, Montenegro.

With the exception of Ukraine, all the rest of the countries will be in Region A2 of Subgroup. Seven countries will be added in Region A2 and only one in Region A1. Nevertheless, in terms of population, 68% of A2 is in EU while for Region A1 57% of the population is in EU. This can be seen In Table C of Appendix 24. In Category A2a are EU countries of Region A2 while A2b are non EU. Likewise, A1a are EU countries of Region A1 and A1b non EU.

In Eastern European Subgroup B, only Georgia needs to be added because it exited CIS in 2008. Countries could be accepted in Subgroups as trading partners or members. Trading partners have similar trading privileges with members but do not participate in decision making and are not part of the Group's economic plan. Countries could remain trading partners for a long time or even for ever.

There is no prerequisite regarding the number of countries that must be added, before merging the two independent groups. In other words, the formation of the Group can happen if no country has been added in Subgroup A or if all countries have been added. Most likely the merging of the two temporary Groups will happen when some countries have been added but not all of them.

For some period, the two temporary Groups will be entirely autonomous. They will operate independently. At a certain point in the future, they will merge and become relatively autonomous Subgroups of Eastern European Group. There is no hurry for merging the two Subgroups, Western A and Eastern B. This could take as long as it is needed, if matters are moving towards the right direction according to AntiNWO's plan.

What has to be done the soonest possible is separation of Western and Eastern European countries in EU. EU's Eastern European and Western European countries need to take different routes. Western European Group 3 will be the continuation of EU, if Eastern European countries exit. Eastern European countries will start a temporary Group that will become Subgroup A of Eastern European Group 4.

Eastern European countries that will spin off from EU will operate as an entirely autonomous Group for some time. This time could range from many months to a few years. For a transitional period, matters would remain as the were in EU, in order to have a smooth transition. There will be two parallel processes. One will be enlargement of the Group. Countries that are not in EU will be gradually added as members or trading partners.

The other process would be preparation to merge and become a relatively autonomous Subgroup of Eastern European Group. AntiNWO's magnificent organizational and economic model will be used in the Group. Part of the model could be implemented before the two Subgroups merge and part of it after. So the two Subgroups should start adjusting to AntiNWO's model and that will be a considerable part of the preparation.

Broadly we could define four phases in the formation of Group 4; A) separate EU's Eastern European countries from Western B) have two entirely autonomous groups in Eastern Europe C) merge these two autonomous groups D) have two relatively autonomous subgroups in Eastern European Group 4. Phase D will be the final that will remain indefinitely. Preparation could start in Subgroup B immediately.

Subgroup A should first detach from Western European countries and then have a transitional period. That is why it is very important to separate Western and Eastern European countries the soonest possible. Since it is certain that Western and Eastern European countries will take different routes, it is better for both parts if the separation happens the soonest possible. Even if NWO's vicious cabal delay the separation, they can't stop it from happening.

We must keep repeating that AntiNWO's plan will be eventually implemented. It was designed taking greatly into consideration people's preferences. It contains what people want and it is people's choice. People should be absolutely certain that this is the plan that will prevail. What is uncertain presently is the timing. Ideally, AntiNWO's plan should be implemented in 1-2 years but it may take longer than that.

Eventually, people will vote out politicians and political parties that do not take into consideration their preferences and vote in politicians and political parties that support their choice, AntiNWO's plan. NWO governments will be replaced with AntiNWO governments, in Europe and elsewhere. It may take some time but it is certain that what people want will happen.