Gradual group expansion

As mentioned before, participating in a group of countries has pros and cons. The answer to the question if this is worth it, whether pros outweigh cons, is to a large extent determined by how a group is. When we have a group like EU, cons should outweigh pros and the answer should be that is not worth it. We have created two super models for grouping countries where we managed to minify cons, therefore we believe that it is worth it because benefits outweigh shortcomings. These two models we will give to USA – UK and Russia as promised although they have people capable of creating much better models.

Still some may not be convinced that it is worth it to be part of a group. Unfortunately they have no other alternative at the present time, given the way international affairs have developed. In World War II, Allied Forces had to form a group of countries as a defensive movement against Axis. Likewise, today countries that are against NWO plan, have to form defensive groups, even if their only common goal is to prevent NWO evil plan from succeeding.

Unlike World War II, there could be more than two groups, three, four, five, six etc. Each group does not have to start with many countries. Evil Union (EU) started with three countries. Benelux was an agreement between Belgium, Netherlands and Luxemburg. The first treaty was signed before the end of World War II, in September 1944, in London. A second treaty was signed in Hague, in March 1947.

Then European Coal and Steel Community followed in 1951 where France, Italy and West Germany also participated (with Benelux). These six countries formed European Economic Community in 1957. It took thirty more years to have six more members. First, UK, Ireland and Denamark joined in 1973. Greece was the tenth member in January 1981. In January 1986, two more members joined, Portugal and Spain.

By 2013, there were twenty-eight members. Perhaps there were good intentions at the beginning. Unfortunately EU evolved into an evil, corrupt, unproductive, decadent Institution, a failed experiment, a great example to avoid. If our two super models are applied, EU will be left behind and their malicious model will become obsolete.

Our intention was not to tell the history of a failed experiment but to point out that a group that started with only three relatively small countries (Belgium, Netherlands, Luxemburg), had six members a few years later and more than fifty years later ended up, including twenty-eight countries and almost all Europe. So countries should not be discouraged, if they are not too many to start with.

Let’s say there are three to five countries, examining the possibility to form a group, even if this is just a defensive strategy against NWO plan. They shouldn’t compare with Evil Union that has twenty-seven members and get disappointed. Many countries will leave failed EU and join their group, if they have something better to offer.

If countries can keep their sovereignty and at the same time advance economically more than EU, they will have created a better model than EU’s faulty model. USA, UK, Canada, Australia, New Zealand should have formed a group and then look for countries in Europe and other continents that will want to join their group because they have a better model.

Russia can find some countries to start a group and then try to expand it towards all directions. China could do the same. There could be four or more groups that will gradually expand. There are some countries that eagerly wait to become EU members because there aren’t any other groups. There should be more alternatives. Competition makes everyone better.

Composition of groups should not be predefined like in stupid NWO flawed model that makes four continental Unions, European, Asian, African, American. Perhaps partitioning EU can be achieved soon. Maybe it will take some time. In the meanwhile they can start their groups, expand them gradually and show everybody that they have created superior models to EU’s defective model.