Group orientation

We have been emphasizing for very long time that in addition to relations inside the Groups, there will be relations between Groups and relations between countries/Regions/Subgroups in different Groups. EU is a Group with many problems that must cease to exist as soon as possible. Nevertheless, we will use EU as an example. There are relations inside the Group, among the countries that are in EU.

But companies from outside the Group have also significant presence in EU. COSCO, China Merchants and Hutchison have stakes in more than thirty ports in EU. The first two are Chinese and the third is based in Hong Kong. NSG, Sumitomo, Toyota, Sony, Mitsubishi, Hitachi, Nomura, Asahi are some of the Japanese companies that have considerable operations in EU.

Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, Linkedin, Stripe, Spotify, Microsoft, Google, Apple, IBM, Cisco, Oracle, Dell, VISA, Mastercard, Tesla, Marriot, Kraft, Heinz, Procter and Gamble, Johnson and Johnson, Nike, Starbucks, McDonald's, Fedex, Uber are only a few of US companies with significant presence in EU. Ex - member UK is included since it is the preferable country for US companies.

Relations are not only limited to business. Relations include trading, direct and indirect investments, joint developments and productions, scientific and educational cooperation, cultural exchanges etc. Any type of activity, no matter how small or insignificant it may be, where parties from two countries are involved can be included in the relations between these two countries.

It was mentioned that the four Regions of Eastern European Group can have different orientations. Western European Group will have two Subgroups, Southern Subgroup A and Northern Subgroup B. These two Subgroups can have different orientations as well. Arab Group 5 could have two Subgroups, African Western Subgroup A and an Asian Eastern Subgroup B. Again, these  two Subgroups can have different orientations.

Since the four Regions of Eastern European Group will have different orientations, it is not necessary to have two levels of Group division, subgroups and regions. There could be only one division, Subgroups A, B, C, D. They can do whatever they want in the Group because they will not be anymore under the strict, irrational, inflexible and catastrophic bureaucracy of Brussels. If they want, they can have two levels of Group division.

So Eastern European Group could have four Subgroups A) German Wannabes (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries) and Ukraine B) Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries and Israel C) Russia, Belarus, Armenia, Georgia D) Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan) and Azerbaijan. The last is included in Southern Caucasus countries with Armenia and Georgia because they are on the western side of Caspia.

Regarding the orientation of the four Subgroups, Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries and Israel can't be oriented towards Western Europe. Balkan region is less developed, compared to the rest of Europe as it can be seen in Appendix 4. The reason is Ottoman rule for many centuries. Most of Balkan territory was in Byzantine Empire which was more advanced and prosperous than Western Europe.

In Fourth Crusade, in 1204 AD, Western Europeans conquered Constantinople. In 1261 AD, Michael VIII Palaiologos defeated Western Europeans and regained Constantinople. Byzantine Empire lasted two more centuries but was the weakest period in its history. Because Byzantine Empire was weakened by Western Europeans, Ottomans seized the opportunity and conquered Constantinople in 1453 AD. Western Europeans are responsible for the end of Byzantine Empire.

After the sack of Constantinople in 1453 AD, Balkans became gradually underdeveloped and poor. Western Europeans and Turks are responsible for the underdevelopment (compared to Western Europe) of Balkans. Obviously, Greco-Thraco-Illyrian countries and Israel can't have an orientation towards Western Europe or be in the same Group with Turkiye. Most likely, they will be oriented towards North America. We should repeat that orientation does not mean exclusive relations but closer.

Western Europeans have been trying to conquer Eastern Europe for a thousand years. If we count Roman conquest, it is more than a thousand years. Through EU, they control Eastern Europe and allow USA limited access to Eastern Europe. Russia is an integral part of Eastern Europe, so they are rightfully in Eastern European Group. They have close relations with China.

In USA and Western Europe, they are afraid that Eastern Europe could be under the influence of China and their access to Eastern Europe will be greatly decreased or entirely restricted. This may have happened if the Group had single orientation. Russia might have pulled the Group towards China. With QUADRUPLE ORIENTATION, Western Europe can have closer relations with Subgroup A (Region A1) and North America with Subgroup B (Region A2).

Regarding the composition of Subgroup B (Region A2), there are two reasons HUNGARY and SLOVAKIA should be ADDED to BALKANS. First of all, they are in Greco-Thraco-Illyrian territory. Also, these two countries have to be included for population reasons. Subgroup A (Region A1) has ten million more as it can be seen in Table B of Appendix 11. So if Hungary and Slovakia are with German Wannabes (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries) and Ukraine, population difference will get much bigger.

People in Balkans are negatively inclined towards Turkiye. During Ottoman rule, they suffered enormously. Also Ottoman rule is the main reason Balkans are less developed than the rest of Europe. Obviously, Balkan countries and Turkiye can't be in the same Group. Best placement for Turkiye is in Group 8 with Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan. They have been infatuated with EU for decades and desperately trying to be a member.

There will be no EU because it is garbage and NWO plan is garbage. There will be Western and Eastern European Group. Turkiye has good relations with all the countries in Group 8. To state it bluntly, in Balkans people greatly dislike Turkiye because they have suffered enormously during Ottoman rule. They only exception might be Albania. Although there have been efforts from governments to have good relations, a lot of detest or even hate lurks.

AntiNWO's approach is "out of sight out of mind". Turkish should be with people that like them, not with people that dislike them. In Eastern European Group, they would be outcasts, pariahs. Also, if they are in a Muslim Group, they can have an important role in the Muslim World. That would not be possible if they were in Eastern European Group.

Turkiye does not have to be in the same Group with Western European countries to have relations with them. The two Groups can make all kinds of agreements. Also Turkiye could have orientation towards Western Europe while other countries in the Group have orientation towards other Groups or areas. Iran could have orientation towards China and Turkiye towards Western Europe.