Grouping development

Grouping is an important part in AntiNWO's plans. We presented grouping in Plan A first and then in Plan B. However this is not the order the groupings were done. Explaining the development of groupings will be useful to understand the reasoning behind them and their correctness. The first grouping done is shown in Table A of Appendix 21. It was the base to develop the grouping in Plan A and one in Plan B.

The first grouping was the most reasonable and resulted in the most homogeneous groups. It was modified though because there were differences in population. In the American continent, two Groups were made. Canada and USA are different than the rest of the continent, what is called incorrectly Latin America. It is Latin speaking not Latin because the only Latin people in the world are Italians.

Group 1 is USA - Canada and Group 2 all the rest of the countries in American continent. As it can be seen in Table A of Appendix 21, the population of the second American Group is almost double (1,7 times). In Europe, two Groups were made initially, Western and Eastern. Group 3 has 40% (41,53) more population. All countries in Group 4 are Eastern European.

Next, are two Groups in Western - Central Asia and North Africa. Group 5 includes Turkiye, Southern Caucasus countries (Georgia, Armenia, Azerbaijan), Central Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan) Iran, Afghanistan. Group 6 consists of Arab countries only. Population in Group 6 is 50% (52) more than in Group 5.

Sub - Saharan Africa has roughly one billion people. So does Eastern Asia, excluding India and China. In the first grouping, there were two groups in each one of these two regions. From that grouping (Table A of Appendix 21), two other groupings resulted with some modifications. The first thing was to divide Latin Group in two Groups as presented in Appendix 18. Italy was added to Eastern European Group to make populations more even.

Also Armenia and Georgia were included in Group 4 since they are Christian while the rest of the countries in Group 5 are Muslim. Some Arab countries were added to Group 5 to make populations more even. After the modifications, the grouping shown in Appendix 18 resulted. In accordance to this grouping, there could be three groups in Sub - Saharan Africa and three in Eastern Asia (excluding China and India) with populations three to four hundred million (300 - 400 mln).

There were some issues and another grouping was developed from the first one (Table A of Appendix 22). Turkiye had requested participation in EU since 1987. Also Turkiye's territory was in Byzantine Empire and has a small part in Eastern Europe. So Turkiye was included in Eastern European Group even though it was almost impossible to be in EU. That allowed Italy to be in Western European Group.

This change was done to accomodate Italy and Turkiye. They should appreciate it and support AntiNWO's plan. Special consideration was given to Italy and Turkiye. Also they are priviliged to have two options. Italy could either be in Western or Eastern European Group. Turkiye could also be in Eastern European Group or in Western Asian with Iran and Afghahnistan.

It is not entirely their decision but they could have a great influence in the decision if they change their currently wrong direction and become against NWO - EU. Then, they could participate in New Yalta Agreement. If not, other countries will determine where Italy and Turkiye wll be placed. In addition to that they should show some appreciation to the special consideration that was given to them in AntiNWO's grouping. Ungratefulness is a horrible thing.

Among the Asian countries that are western of India and China, Pakistan was left out in the previous groupings. So it was included in the same Group with Iran and Afghanistan. Also USMCA, USA Mexico Canada Agreement of new NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement) was in place, Mexico is in North America and USA's largest trading partner. So Mexico was included in the same Group with USA - Canada. Cuba could be included as well.

This grouping seemed a little better so it became AntiNWO's Plan A and is shown in Table B of Appendix 21. In accordance with this grouping, there would be two Groups in Sub - Saharan Africa and two in Eastern Asia (excluding China and India) with roughly half a billion each (500 mln). Arab Group was named Group 5 and Western Asian Group 8 to follow continent order; North America, Europe, Africa, Asia, Oceania.

Under the guidance of Germany and France, German Wannabes (Poland, Czechia, Baltic countries) opposed their participation in Eastern European Group. As an alternative in this grouping, there could be a swap between Italy and German Wannabes. Italy is a Latin country, not Germanic or Celtic. So it is not necessary to be together with Germanic and Celtic countries.

Turkiye wanted to play an important role in the Muslim world. As an alternative, Turkiye can be placed in Group 8 instead of Cental Asian countries (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan) and Azerbaijan (Table B Appendix 22). This works well because they are already in Commonwealth of Independent States CIS which could be a Subgroup of Group 4.

The countries in the two possible swaps have roughly the same population. Turkiye has seven million less than Central Asia - Azerbaijan. Italy's population is four million more than that in German Wannabes. These potential swaps give to Italy and Turkiye two options. In order to be able to influence the decision towards the option they like, they should participate in New Yalta Agreement. This can only happen if they condemn NWO - EU.

According to its geographic location, Israel should be placed in the same Group with Arab countries. This could be a very difficult situation for both sides. The closest non Muslim Group is Eastern European. That should be their first option but participation in Western European Group is also a possibility. Alternatively, Israel could be a USA territory or in USA's Coalition (if there are any) without being in any Group.

Grouping shown in Table B of Appendix 21 was not the first developed but the third. It seemed better and also gained more support in an initial small scale testing. So it became the grouping of Plan A. Grouping will be decided in New Yalta Agreement. We can't know which grouping will be chosen. Any grouping is fine, as long as NWO's ridiculous plan and EU are finished, thrown in the trash. There must be an end to NWO and EU, like it happened a few times in the past.

It is extremely important that EU is divided in at least two Groups. EU is the first and most important step in NWO's plan. EU is NWO and NWO is EU. Letting EU exist would be like leaving Europe under Nazi control in Yalta Agreement. EU is the model for the three other pseudo-continental Unions. It is also very important that AntiNWO's economic and organizational model for Groups is used which gives power to nations.