Huge support for AntiNWO

There are all kinds of supernational and international organizations, trade blocs, economic unions, monetary unions etc. Currently there are ONLY TWO GLOBAL PLANS, so there are ONLY TWO CHOICES. We must make this very clear. One option is NWO's insane plan and the other is AntiNWO's compromise plan. AntiNWO is also preparing a third prevalence plan which has not been made public for reasons that will be explained.

The situation with supernational Groups is completely chaotic. European Union (EU), Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR), BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa), Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are probably among the most well known supernational groups. These are not the only ones. There are many more;

Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CLACS), Association of Caribbean States (ACS), Andean Community, Central American Parliament (PARLACEN), Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), East African Community, Economic Community of Central African States (CEMAC), Southern African Development Community (SADC), Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), African Union (AU), Organization of American States (OAS).

And the list is not over yet; Council of Europe (CoE), Energy Community, Islamic Development Bank, Arab League, Union of South American Nations, Asia Cooperation Dialogue (ACD), Pacific Islands Forum, South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC), Asian-African Legal Consultative Organization (AALCO), Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS), Asia Pacific Forum, Atlantic Union.

If you thought these are a lot, here are some more; Forum of East Asia–Latin America Cooperation, Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Unity Forum, Gulf Cooperation Council, Organization of Turkic States, Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, Central American Integration System, Central Asian Union, North American Union, United States of Latin Africa, Parliamentary Assembly of the Mediterranean. Most of these exist and some are proposed.

And there are a lot more, the list if very big. There are also presumably preferred groups. One was mentioned for Turkiye. They have not proposed clearly the group but they have stated several times their areas of interest. Probably they prefer a group that resembles Ottoman Empire and also adds Central Asian countries and Azerbaijan. The presumably preferred group would include Balkans, Middle East, North Africa and Central Asia - Azerbaijan.

There is great overlapping among all these, existing, proposed and presumably preferred supernational Groups. It is a total chaos. None of all these is a global plan. There are only TWO GLOBAL PLANS, NWO's and AntiNWO's. There is no overlapping in any of these plans. In NWO's failed plan there will be four pseudo-continental Unions, European, American, Asian, African under a Global Dictatorship that NWO will control.

There are huge population differences among the Unions and great heterogeneity. Also there are many other problems. It divides Arab countries, some of them are in African Union and the rest in Asian Union. It separates Russia from the rest of Eastern Europe. NWO's plan is extremely problematic. EU also is a failed model. NWO's maniacs plan to use this failed model in all four pseudo-continental Unions.

AntiNWO proposes 10 + 2 relatively homogeneous Groups. There is some lack of homogeneity though. One example is Mexico's placement with USA - Canada in North American Group 1. Still this is manageable, compared to the chaotic American Union that NWO's lunatics want. The ten Groups will have roughly equal population. It is not perfect but as good as it can get. Some of the existing groups can fit in AntiNWO's plan.

Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) will be Subgroup B of Eastern European Group 4. Gulf and Arabian Peninsula Unity Forum or Gulf Cooperation Council can be Subgroup or Region in Arabic Group 5. Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), East African Community, Economic Community of Central African States (CEMAC), Southern African Development Community (SADC) can be Subgroups in the two Sub-Saharan Groups. MERCOSUR, Andean Community, PARLACEN can be Subgroups in Central - South American Group 2.

Anyone can present another global plan. It has to be global, all around, thorough, meticulous, well thought out. Most likely, It will not beat AntiNWO's plan because AntiNWO examined carefully all possible alternatives before coming up with the best option. It is understandable that various countries may have their own preferences. These preferred groups will have to be included in a global plan and most likely it will not be better than AntiNWO's compromise plan.

Until another well thought out, all around global plan is presented, there are only TWO CHOICES. There is no comparison between the two. If we want to grade them on a 1 to 10 scale, AntiNWO's plan gets 10 while NWO's gets 2. Or AntiNWO's plan gets A and NWO's gets F which is FAILED. AntiNWO's plan is not only a much better grouping. It is a lot more.

It has a much better, more functional and flexible organizational model that includes features like trading partners, subgroups and regions. It also has a Group Parliament comprised by national parliaments where weighted proportionality can change. There is an economic plan of rapid development for every group and the availability of the best systems in the world. There is also a 10+2 Council instead of Global Dictatorship and the option of Group Coalitions in the future.

AntiNWO has tested all three plans with leaders, politicians and citizens all over the world. AntiNWO conducted informal surveys and the preference was; a) AntiNWO's compromise plan 60% b) AntiNWO's prevalence plan 30% c) NWO's failed plan 10%. BETWEEN the TWO CHOICES, SUPPORT for AntiNWO's plan was OVERWHELMING; a) AntiNWO's compromise plan 90% b) NWO's failed plan 10%!

In the other two - plans combinations the result was a) AntiNWO's prevalence plan 65% b) NWO's disastrous plan 35% and a) AntiNWO's compromise plan 70% b) AntiNWO's prevalence plan 30%. So BOTH AntiNWO's PLANS are DOING MUCH BETTER than NWO's FAILURE but the COMPROMISE PLAN is getting STAGGERING SUPPORT. So AntiNWO is pushing for the more popular plan in addition to the prevalence plan not being completely ready.

Initially AntiNWO was trying to get NWO to compromise. There is no need for that anymore because AntiNWO's comprormise plan is getting HUGE SUPPORT. Not even AntiNWO was expecting such a MIND BLOWING SUPPORT. It was a very pleasant surprise. The support is constantly growing and gaining momentum. AntiNWO's informative campaign has not reached everybody yet.

AntiNWO's FAR SUPERIOR plan can be implemented even if NWO does not compromise. In NWO's vicious cabal, they are betting all their money on a losing horse. They will become extinct like dinosaurs. There are some differences between the two possible scenarios. If NWO does not compromise, there would be some delay but this will have a very high cost for them. They will all go to jail and all their fortune will be confiscated.

Is it worth it to go through this when the only thing they can achieve is delaying AntiNWO's plan implementation? It is certain that NWO's DISASTROUS PLAN is FINISHED and AntiNWO's plan will be implemented. EU is FINISHED. There will be Western European Group 3 and Eastern European Group 4. So there is no point and no benefit only to delay. The best thing for everybody is to proceed with AntiNWO's compromise plan the soonest possible.