New Yalta process example
New Yalta process example
The New Yalta Agreement process described in previous articles can be better understood with an example. In Appendix 17, the twenty (20) largest economies in purchasing power parity are shown. Column 1 has the country's GDP and Column 2 the percentage of world's GDP. Column 3 has the cumulative GDP and Column 4 the percentage of World GDP.
Real G4, China, USA, India, Russia have together 48% of world's GDP. Real G20 have 79% of the world's GDP. Some of these countries are in the wrong direction, supporting NWO's ridiculous plan. Definitely Germany and UK are. If they are excluded from the Agreement process, 73% remains. France, Spain, Canada, Poland will also be excluded, unless there is a change of the governments and the new ones are in the right direction.
If these four countries are excluded as well, 67% remains. That is two thirds of the world's GDP. The number of countries are fourteen (20 - 6 = 14) and without Real G4 ten (14 - 4 = 10). If Real G4 can get these countries to approve the Agreement, they will have two thirds of the world's GDP. The percentage will increase when many countries below the twentieth (20th) position approve the Agreement as well.
In the ten (10) countries, Italy and Turkiye are included. They are in the wrong direction but not fully aligned with NWO. So they could change their stance, if they want to participate directly in the Agreement. It would be helpful but not that important. If Italy and Turkiye are excluded, 64% remains. Real G4 will be able to get much more than 3% with the countries below G20 and surpass 67%.
Actually, they do not need that much. The countries that are below G20 have 21% of world's GDP (100 - 79 = 21). Suppose that Real G4 estimate that they can get half of this and a little more, 11% to support the New Yalta Agreement. So they would need 56% from G20 including their percentage (67 - 11 = 56). If their estimation is correct, they would need only 8% from the rest in G20 (56 - 48 = 8).
When they get 8% in G20, they can finalize the Agreement and seek further support from the countries below G20, without making any more modifications. It will be a "take it or leave it" situation. If their estimate of 11% is correct or lower than the actual, they will reach two thirds or 67% (56 + 11 = 67). If their estimate is too high, they will not reach the two thirds target and will have to make further changes in the Agreement. We assumed that they have set as a target 67%.
In the very cautious approach, first they reach 67% by making modifications based on the feedback the receive and then finalize the Agreement. If Italy and Turkiye change their wrong direction and get on the right side, Real G4 could have 67% from G20. If not, they will need 3% more from countries that are below the twentieth (20th) position in order to reach 67% and make the Agreement final.
In that case, they may involve directly in the Agreement, Taiwan, Thailand, Iran, Bangladesh or some other countries. This would not be necessary though because they could take a very small risk. It is almost certain that they would get at least 3% with the approval of countries below G20. The risk is not zero but very small. If they finalize the Agreement with only 56%, the risk is obviously bigger. In that case, they hope to get 11% from the countries below G20, instead of only 3% and that makes the risk bigger.
What if their goal is to get more support than two thirds? In Appendix 17, we added the next twenty largest economies. We can see in Column 4 that they have 93% of the world's GDP. The remaining one hundred and fifty five (155) or one hundred and fifty seven (157) countries have a total GDP of 7%. We can also make another observation. The increase for ten countries added is diminishing.
If we exclude from G40 Germany and UK, the percentage becomes 87%. If we continue with more countries we get; a) France, Spain, Canada, Poland 81% b) Italy Turkiye 77% c) Netherlands, Romania, Belgium 75%. The percentages are rounded to make it easier. That is why excluding Italy and Turkiye from G20 drops the percentage 3% while excluding them from G40 drops it 4%.
If we exclude from G40, the eleven (11) countries that are in the wrong direction, the percentage is still 75%! The countries that remain (if we exclude those in the wrong direction) are twenty nine (40 - 11 = 29) including the four largest. So Real G4 will have to deal with twenty five countries (29 - 4 = 25) in order to get 75% of the world's GDP to support the Agreement. This is roughly six (6,25) countries for each of the G4 and it is really manageable.
The percentage of world's GDP below G40 is 7%. Real G4 could get most of that to support the Agreement, especially if these countries (below G40) know that 75% of the world's GDP supports it. So the support level could surpass 80%. This is not necessary though because two thirds support (67%) is more than enough. Nevertheless, three fourths (75%) support is better and four fifths (80%) even better.
We need to point out that we are not certain that all the rest of the countries in G40 are in the right direction but it is very possible. All we know is that the eleven (11) countries excluded are definitely in the wrong direction. Most of them are in EU occupied territory. Canada and Turkiye are not in EU occupied territory but still in the wrong direction. Even without these eleven (11) countries, the New Yalta Agreement could surpass 80% support level.
AntiNWO's plans are getting huge support all over the world, compared to NWO's disastrous plan. The problematic area is EU occupied territory because it has been contaminated with NWO virus. Unfortunately, in Europe there are many occupation governments with NWO's puppets. They do not serve the people but NWO. This will change in the future. NWO's occupation governments will be replaced with AntiNWO governments that will approve the New Yalta Agreement and implement it.