New Yalta process example 2
New Yalta process example 2
Real G4 could use the rounds approach and make an Agreement without involving any other countries. Then they could run the Agreement through fifty or more countries. It is very possible to get at least 67% support. If this does not happen, they will make changes in the Agreement and go for another round. This is the fastest approach, only if a few rounds are required. If the rounds necessary to reach the target are many, it could take longer than other approaches.
From Appendix 17, we can see that G4 have 48% of the world's GDP and G40 93%. Half of 93% is 46,5%. So G4 have more than half of G40 GDP. Or to state it otherwise, double 48% is 96%. In Appendix 17 we also show the forty (40) largest economies. Although we do not show the next ten (10) countries, we calculated the cumulative percentage and G50 have 96% of world's GDP.
So fifty (50) countries have 96% of the world's GDP and almost one hundred and fifty (150) have only 4%. According to most sources, all countries in the world are one hundred and ninety five (195). If Vatican and Palestine are added, they become one hundred and ninety seven (197). Some sources give more than that. Real G4 have half of the Real 50 GDP or the four first (G4) have equal GDP with the forty six (46) that follow.
We mentioned eleven (11) countries in G40 that are in the wrong direction. The remaining, excluding G4, are twenty five (40 - 11 - 4 = 25). We do not know if all of them are in the right direction but it is possible. Suppose that there are more in the wrong direction. What happens then? Well, Real G4 will not be able to get 75% support in G40.
They may be able to get that and more if they go down the list with the largest economies. The countries do not end in G40. There are many more below that. But the percentage of GDP G4 can add to support the Agreement diminishes. So after G40, the maximum GDP they can add is 7%, if they can get the support of all the remaining countries. Likewise, after G50, the maximum GDP they can add is 4%.
The first ten countries have 65% of the world's GDP. The first twenty have 79%. So the increase by ten more is 14% (79 - 65 = 14). The thirty largest economies have 88% of the worlds GDP and the increase is 9% (88 - 79 = 9). The forty largest have 93% and the increase is 5% (93 - 88 = 5). The fifty largest have 96% and the increase is 3% (96 - 93 = 3). The increase for every ten countries added is diminishing; 65, 14, 9, 5, 3. So after G50, the increase for ten more added will be very small and diminishing.
Suppose that in G50, New Yalta Agreement can get 70% support. In that case it is impossible to reach 75% because even if they get the support from all the remaining countries, it will be 74% (70 + 4 = 74). They do not need 75% because 67% will show a very strong support. Actually they do not even need 67%. Let's explain a little better what they need.
It should be very clear to all countries that there are only two choices, the New Yalta Agreement or NWO's insane Plan. So all these countries that do not like NWO's ridiculous plan should support the New Yalta Agreement. Countries would have to choose between the two because there is no other alternative. Nevertheless, there may be some countries that will be neutral.
In G40, the countries that are in the wrong direction have 18% of the world's GDP (93 - 75 = 18). Some of them may change sides and come on the right side. For the sake of argument, we accept that all remain on the wrong side. There are more in the wrong direction below G40. Real G4 start with 48%. They should be able to reach 60% because they need only 12%.
So the final result could be; New Yalta Agreement 60%, NWO's plan 25%, neutral 15%. There is clearly a winner, New Yalta Agreement. There is no way Real G4 will lose because they start with 48%. Suppose they get only 7% more. Suppose NWO's side gets 30%. Both of these are extremely unlikely to happen but we accept them for the sake of argument.
Even in that extremely unlikely scenario, New Yalta Agreement will be the clear winner; New Yalta Agreement 55%, NWO's plan 30%, neutral 15%. So if G4 can make an Agreement, it is absolutely certain that they will be the winners. The more support they get for the Agreement, the stronger it will be. Obviously 65% is better than 55% and 75% is better than 65%.
There should be an effort to minimize the countries that will be neutral. However, there could be some. What will matter is the percentage of world's GDP they have. They could be many in number but have a small percentage of world's GDP. The neutral countries will be like those that do not vote in the elections. The seats in the Parliament are determined by those who vote.
So percentages will also be calculated for the countries that support one of the two plans. Let's assume that the result is; New Yalta Agreement 63%, NWO's plan 26%, neutral 11%. Among those that are not neutral, the percentages are; New Yalta Agreement 71%, NWO's Plan 29%. This is a huge victory even though New Yalta Agreement does not have two thirds (67%) of the world's GDP.
Not only the support for New Yalta Agreement will count but also the support for NWO's ridiculous plan. Although there should be an effort to minimize neutral countries, these may have already given the victory to New Yalta Agreement. If neutral countries have 5%, the remaining is 95% and New Yalta Agreement has already more than half of it. New Yalta Agreement has already won and it is final. There is no way New Yalta Agreement can lose. The effort is to make the victory as big as possible.